India-China 2020 Border Dispute - Military and Strategic Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bhurki

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
1,301
Likes
1,765
If the Chinese faced a century if humiliation, us Indians faced two centuries of humiliation under British rule. We are not going around the world crying about it now.
If you aren't capitalising on something that could allow you major concessions or atleast try it out, well, then, whose fault is that?
Its akin to not using a discount coupon that could save you 50% on groceries just to feel proud about it, but then being unable to pay the rent. When trying to survive, everything is fair.
 
Last edited:

nick_indian

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
687
Likes
1,983
Country flag
If you aren't capitalising on something that could allow you major concessions or atleast try it out, well, then, whose fault is that?
Its akin to not using a discount coupon that could save you 50% on groceries just to feel proud about it, but then being unable to pay the rent. When trying to survive, everything is fair.
Thank god we don't use this humiliation card. It's a loser's card.
 

ezsasa

Designated Cynic
New Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2014
Messages
32,663
Likes
151,106
Country flag
If you aren't capitalising on something that could allow you major concessions or atleast try it out, well, then, whose fault is that?
Its akin to not using a discount coupon that could save you 50% on groceries just to feel proud about it, but then being unable to pay the rent. When trying to survive, everything is fair.
I used to believe in this school of thought, I no longer do.

When we look around the world, all the groups that are playing the victim card for something that happened long time ago are themselves becoming victims again. Whether they realise it or not, neither is their misery subsiding, nor their insecurities. Once you have insecurity in a group, someone else is bound to take advantage of it.

Playing victim cannot be a long term strategy, might as well use those energies on imparting education & job skills among the masses.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,609
Likes
25,436
Country flag
So India is cozying up with DPRK.

What do you say guys? Is it to intentionally irk China? Makes sense or too risky? :hmm:


 

nick_indian

New Member
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
687
Likes
1,983
Country flag
I used to believe in this school of thought, I no longer do.

When we look around the world, all the groups that are playing the victim card for something that happened long time ago are themselves becoming victims again. Whether they realise it or not, neither is their misery subsiding, nor their insecurities. Once you have insecurity in a group, someone else is bound to take advantage of it.

Playing victim cannot be a long term strategy, might as well use those energies on imparting education & job skills among the masses.
It's similar to feminists in India. They play victims all the time and the country sees women as victims and therefore as weak. Being seen as weak makes them less respected. Modern feminism is a reason why women will always be seen as weak and never achieve true equality.

Just an analogy to what you were saying in your first para.
 

Bhurki

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
1,301
Likes
1,765
I used to believe in this school of thought, I no longer do.

When we look around the world, all the groups that are playing the victim card for something that happened long time ago are themselves becoming victims again. Whether they realise it or not, neither is their misery subsiding, nor their insecurities. Once you have insecurity in a group, someone else is bound to take advantage of it.

Playing victim cannot be a long term strategy, might as well use those energies on imparting education & job skills among the masses.
Thats exactly what Ive said. Playing victim is different from 'feeling victimised', china effectively follows the former, not as a way to limit themselves by reminding of gruesome past they've had, but by using that as a reason to further actions that would, in a normal case, be deemed too belligerent.

Its like a guy gets pinched, and instead of taking it to his heart and hurting his pride, he takes it as a reason to now start punching everybody in the face.
All this, while everybody else( specifically the west in this case) feels its ok to let him have his way to a certain extent.
 

garg_bharat

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
5,078
Likes
10,138
Country flag
Thats exactly what Ive said. Playing victim is different from 'feeling victimised', china effectively follows the former, not as a way to limit themselves by reminding of gruesome past they've had, but by using that as a reason to further actions that would, in a normal case, be deemed too belligerent.

Its like a guy gets pinched, and instead of taking it to his heart and hurting his pride, he takes it as a reason to now start punching everybody in the face.
All this, while everybody else( specifically the west in this case) feels its ok to let him have his way to a certain extent.
Chinese behave like mafia; even in business. The world has to accept that China, as a communist country; must not have access to the free (democratic) world. Only way is to cut off China.
 

johnq

New Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
2,165
Likes
4,353
China is great at winning the peace; provided they have an adversary that is unwilling to fight. They quickly mobilize and build infrastructure on areas that are temporarily unoccupied; and since it's impossible to man the entire border (especially given the tough conditions) they have slowly taken over many square kms of Indian land over the years. They have even maimed hundreds of Indian soldiers with barbed wire sticks to take over Indian land, and yet the Indian soldiers are not allowed to start a firefight.lo
The only way India can stop China is if it has military and civilian leadership that is not afraid of war and its resulting casualties, someone crazy enough like Stalin.
It can be argued that if it wasn't for Stalin's willingness to keep fighting in spite of heavy casualties, Hitler would never have been defeated.
I think Modi is a good man and a great peacetime leader, but I suspect he is too afraid of losing Indian soldiers' lives; I don't blame him, who in their right mind wouldn't be? But unfortunately that also means that the Chinese will continue to grab more land in Ladakh, because Xi will be undeterred unless the Chinese face heavy casualties.
 

Cheran

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Messages
9,154
Likes
80,192
Country flag
Now China wants Pamir plateau


1596680652678.png


Don't be surprised if there is any future Chinese "historical paper" on Del-Hi or Chen-Ai
 

Bhurki

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
1,301
Likes
1,765
The utter arrogance & audacity of these fish stealers is mind boggling.
On the other hand this displays the utter lack of any deterrent tool (unconventional or conventional) in Indian foreign policy vis-a-vis China. They can exercise being intrepid becuase they know that not a whole lot can be brought to bear upon them immediately.

There's a reason they don't play around with russian borders, and its clear they presume that reason doesn't exist incase of dealing with India.
 

garg_bharat

New Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2015
Messages
5,078
Likes
10,138
Country flag
On the other hand this displays the utter lack of any deterrent tool (unconventional or conventional) in Indian foreign policy vis-a-vis China. They can exercise being intrepid becuase they know that not a whole lot can be brought to bear upon them immediately.

There's a reason they don't play around with russian borders, and its clear they presume that reason doesn't exist incase of dealing with India.
Only deterrent can be MAD - thousands of nukes directed at their major cities. It seems nothing else will work.
 

Bhurki

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2018
Messages
1,301
Likes
1,765
Only deterrent can be MAD - thousands of nukes directed at their major cities. It seems nothing else will work.
No.. MAD is only the final deterrent, not useful in any case but to ensure the survival of the country as an entity.
Thats the reason most countries keep its nuclear weapons budget separate from defense budgets. (NNSA in US)

Short of that, you need several rungs of power projection capability through -
Economy (SoKo tourism hit by china)
Covert/Disruptive ( HK fiasco in china by other countries)
Overt ( US stationing its aircraft carrier next to any nation that as much as lifts a finger at it)

If you assume only MAD to be as a deterrent, something which can only be exercised after 90% of damage has already been done( and not when an enemy company/battalion walks towards your border) , then you'll definitely open yourselves up for recieving all of that 90% of damage.
This is one of the reasons US tries to plug each of its foreign policy feature with hard deterrent power.
( After russia annexed crimea, the conventional NATO deterrent in Europe was deemed not usable in low intensity fights, and so you have the tactical W76-2).
 

cereal killer

New Member
Joined
May 14, 2020
Messages
2,146
Likes
8,416
Country flag
So India is cozying up with DPRK.

What do you say guys? Is it to intentionally irk China? Makes sense or too risky? :hmm:


India is like 2nd largest Trading partner of DPRK. So we sorta have good relations with them. But not on the level of China I guess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Articles

Top