Is F-16 superior to Su 30 MKI ?
Superior in terms of what?
IMHO, your question is not properly formed. When you say superior its a
generalization of the whole platform being superior. However is real world scenario,
random events (pilot mistakes) can put a shiny toy as inferior,
like J20 or Rafael.
Now to answer your question, historically speaking SU30s is a derivative of SU27 which were being developed in the late 80s to counter western threat such as
F15Eagle. SU27 does it much better to F15 eagle and its derivatives.
Now when the F16 program started, it was thought of as nimble, small and very agile fighter. F16 and its other variant were generations ahead of SU27. Both, in terms of avionics and armaments. Than sanctions happened and soviet union disintegrated (so less funding) which impacted the avionics program of soviets.
To counter that later, Russian built the SU30 platform and much later SU35. As F16 got modernized, the OEMs countered that with
better auxiliary aerodynamics and
somewhat better avionics. So they improved the platform from SU30MKK to SU30MKE (e for export).
Russian develop late but develop counter offensive products since cold-war. Its only now that they shifted from
counter-offensive to full blown offensive (SU57 → 22 + 35 = 57) got my point.
The improvements were:
1. Unmatched wing-loading.
2. Unmatched maneuverability with canards and TVC Nozzles.
3. Better avionics with Bars PESA long range radar.
(J20 got detected by this*)
4. Multi-role (able to switch between ground missions to air superiority in no time)
5. Network centric warfare capability (With just two MKI you can make them into miniature awacs)
6. High energy to low energy kinematics performance. (
F16 is only high energy fighter, high turn rate fighter)
7. Higher angels (altitude) (meaning you can fire R77 at supersonic speeds and make it BVR, sort of)
8. Unmatched range. (
without drop tanks)
9. Can serve as a small aerial refuel tanker.
To defeat F16:
1. Need counter BVR weapons (now we have, Astra Mk1) (gap is now closed) PAF will be shitting in there pants. Now MKI can go full offensive.
2. Need better radar and avionics (the only thing it suffers from). However, if both gets detected, its combat proven that BVR missiles can be defeated. However taking former point, this point weigh less as now you can at least reach F16 to force it into WVR fight.
Now F16 was actually created for WVR fights (It got BVR capability due to improvement in radar tech) so you might think of well why we force this jet into WVR fight.
Well because other than a high turn rate fighter
its really poor in low energy flight regimes. Which brings me to,
3.
Never allow F16 into a turn rate fight. Not that MKI can't turn better, it can well over out-turn it,
but weight is an important factor when it comes to climb-rate. F16 pilot would force an MKI pilot into vertical climbs which is where things go pretty nasty.
Thankfully you have WVR missiles.
Nevertheless, there are many tactics not just I pointed out in #3, but many. Had a long chat with an IAF buddy of mine. Those red-flag exercise and other exercise are great benefit.
Fun-fact red-flag exercises are not for practicing skills, they are collecting data for 6th gen program, because AI would be providing better solutions in real-time and for that you need a lot of data.
* For the person who maintains
J20 thread should know that Phased array is basically AESA but with less TR modules . It only
suffers with accuracy but not detection.