- Joined
- Jul 12, 2014
- Messages
- 32,663
- Likes
- 151,106
Inline with my assumption that next escalation by China will be with intent of influencing 2024 elections.hmmm.
Inline with my assumption that next escalation by China will be with intent of influencing 2024 elections.hmmm.
Which one?Breaking
India to rename one finger at Galwan after Ajai Shukla.
This will be now known as "Dull La".
They will continue to survive like NK does, on the expense of janta. They will function on bare minimum make no mistake of that. All their resources focused to their military. Itna to resourceful hai wo log bhi. The hammer will have to come from outside. Chinese won't let go of them, pakistan has good arable land, they need them, pakistan is a good pet. They will keep funding them.There are signs of a China-Russia-Iran axis forming. This axis may not include Pakistan; and Pakistan may remain a separate entity as a client state of China. However survival of Pakistan looks increasingly iffy as its economic condition continues to deteriorate. Remember countries need money to survive. Countries are very much like companies - bankruptcy means dissolution. Iran has oil which remains a valuable resource.
There is a separate Ottoman empire axis being tried out by Turkey. Time will tell if that would succeed.
Actually he made a mistake, fingers are at Pangong ... However it still makes senseWhich one?
The middle one (F4).
In hindsight, we should not have accepted Tibet's annexation.Sometimes i feel like we betrayed them
An Upgrade in AAMs, radars and Avionics will give it a massive boost in capabilities.Looks sexy, but without >100km Meteor class BVRs, it's next to zilch!
.
we basically accepted Aksai Chin "annexation" , forget Tibet.In hindsight, we should not have accepted Tibet's annexation.
This model predicts a massive attack on all front with in 3/4 yrs to solve boundry issue for once nd all time . Indians have habbit to forget everything.. I hope ladakh incident forces govt to increase defence expenditure dramatically ..hmmm.
nope u r wrong they don't want to solve boundry issue.This model predicts a massive attack on all front with in 3/4 yrs to solve boundry issue for once nd all time . Indians have habbit to forget everything.. I hope ladakh incident forces govt to increase defence expenditure dramatically ..
After all they want their slaves in power.Inline with my assumption that next escalation by China will be with intent of influencing 2024 elections.
Chinese will always outspend us in an arms race. One way to level this asymmetry is widening the scope of our offense. We must always be on the offensive against China diplomatically. We must induct ethnic Tibetans into our clandestine apparatus, infiltrate Tibet, and carry out not just espionage, but also sabotage. We must begin salami slicing into Pakistan. And most of all, we should be ready to go on the tactical offensive even if we're not fighting to win. Sometimes dealing the enemy a costly victory is an effective way to send a strategic message.This model predicts a massive attack on all front with in 3/4 yrs to solve boundry issue for once nd all time . Indians have habbit to forget everything.. I hope ladakh incident forces govt to increase defence expenditure dramatically ..
Problem is that i don't think back in those days anyone expected the Commies to be such greedy bast@rds that they would start laying their dirty bat virus eyes on Ladakh and Arunachal too. If anyone had any idea I am certain they would not have accepted the annexation.we basically accepted Aksai Chin "annexation" , forget Tibet.
They want to take back S. Tibet ( arunachal pradesh) . And laddakh one of the 5 fingers nd secure cpec once fr all .. Its one of the achievement they want 2 have before 2049 . Though that ll require more than dreaming ... They might try 2 do it before taiwan as fighting taiwan ll invite USA while same is nt true in our case .nope u r wrong they don't want to solve boundry issue.
Ajay Shukla has a very punchable face.
Some very strong language from Gen.V.K.Singh. Traitor ....
In order to meet such a challenge. it is ITBP in all aspects - their training, Organisation and Command and Control that needs to be geared towards quick and adequate response. They need to be organised towards creating conditions for employment of Army sitting just behind or along with them.hmmm.
but will ips lobby accept this.In order to meet such a challenge. it is ITBP in all aspects - their training, Organisation and Command and Control that needs to be geared towards quick and adequate response. They need to be organised towards creating conditions for employment of Army sitting just behind or along with them.
That is why I have been advocating militarization of border guarding CAPFs = induction and initial training as also five years military service before being transferred to CAPF .. followed by one months joint training with Army formations every year.
LAC is no longer a peaceful line... it is a military hot wire.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
India-China 2020 Border conflict | Indian Army | 29497 | ||
V | Non-Military implications of India-China Standoff 2020 | China | 61 | |
Memes & Jokes India China Standoff 2020 | Members Corner | 334 | ||
India to overtake China in 2020: Swaminathan Aiyar | Economy & Infrastructure | 33 |