The problem, if you look at your post, is absolutely of your own assumption and selective reading of the tweet.
The tweets that needed to be posted and read in conjunction are reposted for your reference (kindly note the date/time):
#1
View attachment 82449
#2
View attachment 82450
I am sure that this is adequately clear.
Secondly, points, in military parlance are never synonymous with bases. The points I refer to, are those which can not be identified on any of the maps you shall be able to access as no structures will be seen on them. They were not required to be visible for anyone.