No. It doesn't take more than a few minutes to google and read about Procedure Qualification Records (POR) and industrial QA practices.
It also doesn't take very long to open and read history of respective space programs around the world.
I am an engineer in pressure systems, steels and welding technology. I have worked on boilers, piping and headers (tubed piping manifolds which are useful on rocket launch pads too) for steel plants, chemical and nuke reactors, shells (for artillery ammunition), installation of power plants, metal forming and welding.
I have never worked in cryogenics specifically though and only have theoretical knowledge. I became an intern when was just 17 years old. I have once got chance to visit VSSC though. But only visited.
They just don't act. And that's why personal opinions of uneducated Pakistani and Bangladeshi teens has turned them into memes in Indian circles.
They end up with, "We are going to conquer yindus" with no specific references.
But you need to have basic knowledge of rocketry.
Problem lies with you that you haven't. ISRO's overall time period of progress is good since they caught with starting in 90s but China, Japan and France started in 70s. They were ahead in 90s of what we are today and have only moved slowly. Asian Space Race started in 2000s only and India caught up quickly to reach in league of major ones.
US and USSR were exceptional because of cold war budgets and slowed down thereafter.
Also, rocket launch frequency and satellite manufacturing depends upon industrial capacity and budgets. Who makes progress how swift is reflected by increment in capacity and addition of capabilities.
How come you know that only this scientist is right guy there and others are not? Have you interviewed or at least got to read appraisal reports of any of ISRO employees? I am at least capable of studying dimensions, mechanical properties, tolerances and NDT of engine if I can be given drawings unlike you, you don't need to mock me. All humans are capable of working and have similar minds. Research is a hit and trial thing and not continous upgrades of an internet strategy game with certain results.
Your problem lies with approach and misinterpretation. Nobody says ISRO is no. 1 or doesn't need catch up but your poetic ideas of improvement aren't better than humanities student writing in likes of Dainik Bhaskar. It is quite easy for you ridicule all the hardwok of enginners and associates engaged in F10 launch and somehow advocate to replace them with foreign "talent" (as if you have done some kind of assessment with their quality control).
Since your point of view starts from, "Vro, Indian dogs don't hapoliticians vro. Western dogs keep it clean vro. Indians dog do s*x openly vro. They pee on tires of my car vro!" and you rely on news articles and OpEds for your confirmation bias, nobody can help you.
Your mind is in some different world with some different approach which makes you think ridiculing Indian scientific community just like an uneducated journalist thinks ridiculing any politician kinda makes you cool. Both don't know anything.
