- Joined
- Oct 14, 2020
- Messages
- 27,871
- Likes
- 192,871
This is the anti erdogan voter most probably. Average Kemalist is hardcore ethno nationalist who wants to be european, this is the turkish liberal.
Someone needs to help Ivorians and the Irish to have a different flag design. I don't see us changing the flag as it has too much sentimental value now. Also the ones from Niger. Their's is a blatant rip-off of our flag.Its the flag of Ivory Coast not Ireland or India all of you morons
No, we live under jurisdiction of a political power. So, we are not stateless. A state can be theocracy or a democracy.1) we are stateless. Hindus or Hinduism not defended by constitution. I don't know if you understand what does it mean.
No, despite being declared a Jewish state, Israel functions like a secular democracy and politics about Muslims in that country is similar to France or India (albeit a bit more anti Muslim given they all are direct enemies of them).2) this is exactly my first point, despite of all shit Israel remain a Jewish state. There is zero power for Muslims in Israel that's how you defend political Zionism. In Hindus context, we do not have such luxury.
You seriously live in a fairy tale.3) they exist because of Israel. This is literally laughable. Every jew around the world is asset for Israel.
Indian government doesn't recognize any law beyond its frontiers. It neither follows "international law" nor preaches it since it was simply designed to power down global South.4) Indian government criticise but never defend as per law.
No, Israel is a de jude Jewish state and de facto secular state. India is both de jure and de facto secular state. You can't make a Hindu theocracy since Hinduism neither has a code like Bible or Quran nor has a sky daddy God or law against non Hindus. Hindu was just a name given to various Indian cultural group by foreigners.In Israel a Jew defacto a citizen of Israel but same is not true for Hindus.
Kabhi CAA padha hai ke Kya hai?CAA ki fati padi hai... You call it a Hindu state.
Hindu was synonym of Indian until 1930s.5) Hinduism is characteristic of India until Hindus in majority.
As if it doesn't took a thousand years of conversions to entire population before which didn't happen in India.Whole Iran become Islamic country within 20 years.
Political nature of Abrahamic religions makes them interfere in state. Eastern religions are about souls, are apolitical and don't need any political backing to survive.Top on that there a Documentary of a Egyptian Terrorist ( forget his name). I have listened his interview and came to realised how important it is to have political nature of culture to survive. Sooner or later you will disappear if your identity is not protected by law of country.
Thier forex doesn't allow it.Someone needs to supply these
View attachment 205562
Naam padh ke pata hi nahi chalta ki terrorists hai ya political party.All right! ISI lackey TLP has been activated now
This is done to counter Imran's Youthias on streets
Imran may be arrested after May 22.
Its both.Naam padh ke pata hi nahi chalta ki terrorists hai ya political party.
First of all, I am not talking about citizens, neither I'm saying as Indian citizen I'm stateless. I am talking about Hindus, their political significance and laws which guarantee its survival.No, we live under jurisdiction of a political power. So, we are not stateless. A state can be theocracy or a democracy.
1) Is there anything by constitution guarantee survival of Hindu or Hinduism?? Don't say citizen or culture.There will be no India when Hindus go extinct or vice versa period.
Israel evacuated Ethiopian Jews. Those Jews were neither Israeli or Israeli citizen so what could be possible reason for their rescue?? Israel never rescued any Arab Muslim who migrated from Israel despite of being native Israeli.Isarel doesn't defend Jews of world, other states of world chose to defend Jews of Israel against Muslims and armed them heavily
Pada toh bhai tumne bhi nhi hai. But I meant by giving CAA reference was that There is literally no mechanism to safeguard Hindus even if the are native Hindu due to Hindus are not defended by constitution. To save a one Hindu you have to save Christian and Muslim also.Kabhi CAA padha hai ke Kya hai?
I ask you a question, If three Hindus living in 3 different countries one in America, second is in Islamic country, third is in Hypothetical Hindu Republic. So which Hindu's future is better protected??So if you a believe that a Muslim thrown out of Myanmar has a "state" just because an Islamic state called Saudi exists thousands of miles away or a Japanese Buddhist or Indian Hindu is stateless because these countries don't have an official religion, you simply don't have an iota of knowledge or logic on topic you are blabbering about.
Neither of state does guarantee security for anyone except it's own people.1) Is there anything by constitution guarantee survival of Hindu or Hinduism?? Don't say citizen or culture.
Has a Muslim ever become PM in Hindu India or ever a Muslim is killed on roadside reasonlessly by Jews like Muslims do?2) Can Arab Muslim become Prime Minister/President of Israel??
By that logic, India does a lot of by eventually accepting Hindu refugees or issuing visas and citizenship of foreign Hindus whose generations have lived in Oceania and Latin America.Israel evacuated Ethiopian Jews. Those Jews were neither Israeli or Israeli citizen so what could be possible reason for their rescue?? Israel never rescued any Arab Muslim who migrated from Israel despite of being native Israeli.
That doesn't make Indian Hindus stateless which are 94% of global Hindus.Pada toh bhai tumne bhi nhi hai. But I meant by giving CAA reference was that There is literally no mechanism to safeguard Hindus even if the are native Hindu due to Hindus are not defended by constitution.
You certainly haven't read anything in CAA or you wanted it to be Hindu specific (as if refugees covered in CAA haven't already been living in India for a decade now or as if CAA does anything against citizenship norms of Muslims which are already established).To save a one Hindu you have to save Christian and Muslim also.
Neither Muslims have enough fertility yet to surpass Hindus in subcontinent nor bringing Hindus from outside is going to stop it.If tomorrow Muslim become Majority can you guarantee that Hindus in Subcontinent will be welcomed in India??
In a tech and future oriented states.I ask you a question, If three Hindus living in 3 different countries one in America, second is in Islamic country, third is in Hypothetical Hindu Republic. So which Hindu's future is better protected??
Whichever is willing to. What you are talking about is on state ideology (and financial position, state shouldn't be just going bankrupt).Suppose if above 2 out 3 got a existential threat then which state will be the first responder for help or better positioned for help??
No, oversimplified fallacy cannot be contradicted by oversimplified brief answer. You do not bother to dig things, you prefer what is your confirmation bias and your own opinion.Please keep answer brief and to the point.
This Congressi type argument have heard zillion of times. But no clear answer of my questions.Neither of state does guarantee security for anyone except it's own people.
Taliban, PFI, Al Qaeda and ISIS etc. are Islamic equivalents of aims what you want to advocate here but they aren't state. They are the organisation willing to kill anyone in any country for their "people" and their religion.
Has a Muslim ever become PM in Hindu India or ever a Muslim is killed on roadside reasonlessly by Jews like Muslims do?
We have already discussed Israel is a de facto western style secular state. So your example of Israel stands null & void. There are no de facto theocracies left in modern world except Islamic state due to political nature of Islam.
By that logic, India does a lot of by eventually accepting Hindu refugees or issuing visas and citizenship of foreign Hindus whose generations have lived in Oceania and Latin America.
Germans issue passports more easily to people of German ancestry.
That's all what a sensible state does for it roots than making stupid shariah laws like Islamic states.
You claimed that every Jew lives on mercy of Israel which is simply ridiculous.
American and European Jews don't live on mercy of Israel nor they give a damn about it. So are Hindus of Indonesia, Latin America or West.
That doesn't make Indian Hindus which are 94% of global Hindus, stateless either.
CAA is anyway a mechanism to post partition closure of topic and defining who wanna live in India and ending border refugee drama forever. People who chose to stay in AfPak for properties must stay there.
You certainly haven't read anything in CAA or you wanted it to be Hindu specific (as if refugees covered in CAA haven't already been living in India for a decade now).
Neither Muslims have enough fertility yet to surpass Hindus in subcontinent nor bringing Hindus from outside is going to stop it.
94% of Hindus are Indians and rest 6% are people of Indian descent living elsewhere. Their fertility rate is even far lower than Indian Hindus. So no way the population balance will be achieved.
Only solution is to cut down Muslim fertility.
In a tech and future oriented states.
The fetish of copying Muslims violence and bigotry is only limited to a minority of trads. A Hindu is more material is focused on political and financial power through tech.
The same characteristic which makes India a powerful organized state with tech against tribalistic and delusional islamic states. The same thing which separates characteristic of Japan, EU and US with Pakistan, Afghanistan and Yemen.
Whichever is willing to. What you are talking about is on state ideology (and financial position, state shouldn't be just going bankrupt).
No, oversimplified fallacy cannot be contradicted by oversimplified brief answer. You do not bother to dig things, you prefer what is your confirmation bias and your own opinion.
It is interesting that no international voices have supported pitai party. Immi pissed off all leaders.I wouldn't call this crackdown against PTI as chickening out. Their Army has identified that Imran Khan alone has a cult following, not his party leaders and workers, so they are systematically going against the whole PTI Cadre and apparatus while temporarily leaving Immy alone. They're also going after all their internal Army ranks who had sympathy with Immy, and after the prominent rioters to ensure that their population doesn't do May 9th again. They've also started counter mobilization with their islamist zombies. The situation is very much going in their Army's favour when taking all of this into consideration.
The entire Imran cult following is only in Punjab and parts of KPK. Sindhis and Balochis don't care. Paki punjabis don't have it in them to do any serious sustained insurgency against their army. Vast majority of Pashtuns don't care enough to do it either, even though immy is a pashtun. Pashtuns will only go ape shit when their particular tribe is being attacked directly, which the Paki Army isn't stupid enough to do.
But PKR is down 50% against the $ during the same period so the debt has actually gone down. Porki fuddu economics