Failed Terrorist State of Pakistan: Idiotic Musings
- Thread starter A.V.
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 10,609
- Likes
- 25,435
You can add one more...
:denied:
"What did we get?" Bangladesh.
"What will we get?" Baluchistan.
"What will we get?" Sindhudesh.
"What we are getting?" 40,000 dead in 10 years.
"What recognition did we get worldwide" Terrorist State of the world.
Last edited:
Some Paki's on JF -17
".......but i am critical of JF-17 being exported to countries like Congo...........i mean, it's tech can easily be revealed and strengths and weaknesses mapped out by, future would be enemies of Pakistan/China. I think PAC/CAC need to be very cautious in this regard and not get carried away in the dream of cashing in on this capable jet."
Reply to this
"yup thats a disturbing thought my friend.
Congo can pose a serious threat to Pakistan. if that happens we must launch a preemptive strike with our JF-17s"
Comparison b/w Gripen and thunder
"First of all Gripen is decade old and jf-17 new one.
Its true Gripen is currently little better then Jf bt JF is new,
in the coming year JF-17 Block II will be comparable to gripen NG if nt better..
currently Gripen is better because
has
higher payload
better radar
reduced RCS
Avionics
Supercruise
American BVR"
".......but i am critical of JF-17 being exported to countries like Congo...........i mean, it's tech can easily be revealed and strengths and weaknesses mapped out by, future would be enemies of Pakistan/China. I think PAC/CAC need to be very cautious in this regard and not get carried away in the dream of cashing in on this capable jet."
Reply to this
"yup thats a disturbing thought my friend.
Congo can pose a serious threat to Pakistan. if that happens we must launch a preemptive strike with our JF-17s"
Comparison b/w Gripen and thunder
"First of all Gripen is decade old and jf-17 new one.
Its true Gripen is currently little better then Jf bt JF is new,
in the coming year JF-17 Block II will be comparable to gripen NG if nt better..
currently Gripen is better because
has
higher payload
better radar
reduced RCS
Avionics
Supercruise
American BVR"
Ankit Purohit
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2012
- Messages
- 1,082
- Likes
- 667
Blackwater
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 21,156
- Likes
- 12,211
Emperor of panipatHis holiness:
From a Paki who comes from the lair of OBL
"JF-17 is indeed a third generation fighter as per pakistan/chinese terminology of fighter aircraft generation
even the PAC site official term it as 3rd generation.nothing wrong about this
bt here
3rdgen=4th gen"
"JF-17 is indeed a third generation fighter as per pakistan/chinese terminology of fighter aircraft generation
even the PAC site official term it as 3rd generation.nothing wrong about this
bt here
3rdgen=4th gen"
LETHALFORCE
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2009
- Messages
- 29,966
- Likes
- 48,916
farhan_9909
Join Date:Aug 2012
Location:Abbottabad,Bannu
Harpoon missiles were test fired.
LETHALFORCE ↑
yes and rpg as well
Join Date:Aug 2012
Location:Abbottabad,Bannu
Harpoon missiles were test fired.
LETHALFORCE ↑
yes and rpg as well
ganesh177
Senior Member
- Joined
- May 18, 2009
- Messages
- 1,308
- Likes
- 1,657
Bow down to the mighty shit
"Dude "Republic of India" has nothing to do with Indus River Valley Civilization. Britannica is obviously wrong to call it Indian subcontinent.
Jawaharlal Nehru was wrong to Call present-day Bharat "India."
The western or "greek" word India is an incorrect trem to call the region from Afghanistan to Myanmar.
Why do you think the Europeans call the Carribean the West Indies? They thought they reached India. The region, not "Republic of India." Its a lie to call today's "Republic of India" with the geographical term "India." Are we clear here.
Obviously Nehru was wrong, and only wanted to increase Bharat's soft power by miseducating ignorant people.
How can Afghanistan be part of the "Republic of India's" culture or history."
"it is wrong to use Indian subcontinent. Modern scholars don't even use Indian subcontinent due to sensitivities.
Now it is known as South Asia, not Indian subcontinent. lol, it doesn't matter how many sources you come up with.
Its the realities that matter. The reality is that its South Asia, and not Indian subcontinent."
"No India has no claim on IVC. How can India have a claim on IVC LOL! While doesn't India also have a claim on Gandhara or the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan then?
The answer is obvious India has no claim on IVC or Gandhara, or the history in Afghanistan. Perios."
"lol, INdia claiming IVC, is like Pakistan trying to claim Taj Mahal.
Indian members please give us a break. The answer is obvious Pakistan has no claim on Taj Mahal as India has no claim on IVC.
Case closed, and everybody be happy now, because WE KNOW THE TRUTH!"
"Since Indus River Valley Civilization was mainly in Pakistan, it belong to Pakistan. Just because not that tiny part of IVC is not within in Pakistani borders, does not mean it is belongs also to the neighboring countries.
Its like having the British Empire, Canada being a part of the British empire, and then also calling the British empire the Canadian empire.
The heart of indus river valley civilization was in Pakistan, nearly all the sites are in Pakistan.
You cannot have it both ways.
Same thing about Mughal empire. Just because Mughals controlled Afghanistan, does not make Afghanistan a part of "Republic of India's" history."
"IVC was a Urbanite civilization, this is evident by their advanced city planning.
lol, your desperate argument about that people were not stable to any particular place is quite false.
The Persians were one of the civilizations that stayed in one place just like the IVC.
I will agree that IVC may have encroached a very small area of "Republic of India's" territory and Afghanistan if we go by the map, but India and Afghanistan cannot claim IVC at all.
It would be like Afghanistan claiming the Mughal empire or the Taj Mahal."
"We are proud of their scientific achievement and cultural creativity, not their false beliefs.
Please Are you trying to say Muslims cannot claim IVC. Egyptians claim the Egyptian civilization, Iran claims the Persian civilization, and we are taking what rightfully belongs to us.
We took back Gandhara, and now we have taken the IVC civilization which rightfully belongs to us and not India."
The sick mofos just keep ranting.
"Dude "Republic of India" has nothing to do with Indus River Valley Civilization. Britannica is obviously wrong to call it Indian subcontinent.
Jawaharlal Nehru was wrong to Call present-day Bharat "India."
The western or "greek" word India is an incorrect trem to call the region from Afghanistan to Myanmar.
Why do you think the Europeans call the Carribean the West Indies? They thought they reached India. The region, not "Republic of India." Its a lie to call today's "Republic of India" with the geographical term "India." Are we clear here.
Obviously Nehru was wrong, and only wanted to increase Bharat's soft power by miseducating ignorant people.
How can Afghanistan be part of the "Republic of India's" culture or history."
"it is wrong to use Indian subcontinent. Modern scholars don't even use Indian subcontinent due to sensitivities.
Now it is known as South Asia, not Indian subcontinent. lol, it doesn't matter how many sources you come up with.
Its the realities that matter. The reality is that its South Asia, and not Indian subcontinent."
"No India has no claim on IVC. How can India have a claim on IVC LOL! While doesn't India also have a claim on Gandhara or the Buddhist statues in Afghanistan then?
The answer is obvious India has no claim on IVC or Gandhara, or the history in Afghanistan. Perios."
"lol, INdia claiming IVC, is like Pakistan trying to claim Taj Mahal.
Indian members please give us a break. The answer is obvious Pakistan has no claim on Taj Mahal as India has no claim on IVC.
Case closed, and everybody be happy now, because WE KNOW THE TRUTH!"
"Since Indus River Valley Civilization was mainly in Pakistan, it belong to Pakistan. Just because not that tiny part of IVC is not within in Pakistani borders, does not mean it is belongs also to the neighboring countries.
Its like having the British Empire, Canada being a part of the British empire, and then also calling the British empire the Canadian empire.
The heart of indus river valley civilization was in Pakistan, nearly all the sites are in Pakistan.
You cannot have it both ways.
Same thing about Mughal empire. Just because Mughals controlled Afghanistan, does not make Afghanistan a part of "Republic of India's" history."
"IVC was a Urbanite civilization, this is evident by their advanced city planning.
lol, your desperate argument about that people were not stable to any particular place is quite false.
The Persians were one of the civilizations that stayed in one place just like the IVC.
I will agree that IVC may have encroached a very small area of "Republic of India's" territory and Afghanistan if we go by the map, but India and Afghanistan cannot claim IVC at all.
It would be like Afghanistan claiming the Mughal empire or the Taj Mahal."
"We are proud of their scientific achievement and cultural creativity, not their false beliefs.
Please Are you trying to say Muslims cannot claim IVC. Egyptians claim the Egyptian civilization, Iran claims the Persian civilization, and we are taking what rightfully belongs to us.
We took back Gandhara, and now we have taken the IVC civilization which rightfully belongs to us and not India."
The sick mofos just keep ranting.
