DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

[Lonewolf]

No, since 2000s, maneuvering is a necessary capability for all the P5 ICBMs, especially in the case of Russia and China.

That's for terminal phase not mid phase , show me some early stage manuver , any text that claim so

 

[fire starter]

 

[fire starter]

Another import while we get awed by the pics from drdo....either we are no where ready as we think with some of these things or its corrupt bastards preserving their middlemen cuts....

It's make 2 category only private companies can participate in it.

 

[Lonewolf]

Would someone help compile a list of tech we haven't heard of but is required and maybe in DEVEOLPMENT , like this tsto type bomber or reconnaissance aircraft .

 

[Karthi]

prototype of the plasma pyrolysis system. used for safe disposal of bio-medical waste without formation of harmful chemicals and gases. this technology is being used in GIFT city. variant of he same can be used in various applications , including in aircraft carriers for waste disposal

 

[fire starter]

Pic credit- defence decode.

Notice the fuze it has been developed by drdo

 

[fire starter]

SLBM testing pontoons seems like new missile with much bigger diameter is ready.

 

[Lonewolf]

SLBM testing pontoons seems like new missile with much bigger diameter is ready.
View attachment 88951

K 4 or k 5 ?

 

[SavageKing456]

SLBM testing pontoons seems like new missile with much bigger diameter is ready.
View attachment 88951

K5

 

[gslv markIII]

SLBM testing pontoons seems like new missile with much bigger diameter is ready.
View attachment 88951

location?

 

[SavageKing456]

so is that nirbhay test happening tommorow?

 

[no smoking]

That's for terminal phase not mid phase , show me some early stage manuver , any text that claim so

No, the maneuver in the terminal phase is performed by RV generally through aerodynamic design.

The midcourse maneuver is done by the PBV through the liquid engine thrust. The procedure of PBV of the MIRVs releasing multi RVs is already a kind of maneuver. Generally the rocket engine on PBV can provide around 200s time for maneuvering. If you want a much larger extent maneuver, reduce the number of RV, leave more fuel to maneuvering.

 

[SavageKing456]

No, the maneuver in the terminal phase is performed by RV generally through aerodynamic design.

The midcourse maneuver is done by the PBV through the liquid engine thrust. The procedure of PBV of the MIRVs releasing multi RVs is already a kind of maneuver. Generally the rocket engine on PBV can provide around 200s time for maneuvering. If you want a much larger extent maneuver, reduce the number of RV, leave more fuel to maneuvering.

This ABM would still knock-off chinese junk and would mostly end the boasting of HGV done by China

 

[porky_kicker]

On the issue of corona virus which is alleged to be bio-engineered for offensive use, its ramifications should be taken very seriously I believe its high time to rethink on offensive biological warfare program as a deterrence or as analogue to Russian 'dead hand' fail-deadly & mutual assured destruction deterrence.

IMO nuclear weapons cannot guarantee protection against biological weapons because there will be literally no survivors if a country comes under biological attack.

Even if India is hit with 200 nukes there will be many survivors, with biological weapons literally no survivors over a period of time.

Eg if 1 kg of highly refined botulinum toxin is released & dispersed evenly by wind in all directions it is more than enough to kill 1 billion people if breathed in by them.

AFAIK bio-warfare agents have a pre-engineered oxidation life. Eg say botulinum toxin has been engineered to have a oxidation life of 72 hours

It means it will stay virulent for 72 hours & will kill everything within that time period after which it will lose virulence High possibility local mutations might occur leading to continued virulence in few effected areas, but a sensible country will never develop a deadly biological agent without simultaneously developing an antidote for the same to cater for own safety & unforseen complications during possible use, unless they are as dumbfucks as who you know

I have a suspicion that after what happened last year many countries have resumed their dormant programs relating to the same

 

[porky_kicker]

Why so much sanata in this otherwise very active thread

Will be rejoining soon by end of this week

 

[Lonewolf]

Why so much sanata in this otherwise very active thread

Will be rejoining soon by end of this week

Any update on notam , no firing yet ?

 

[porky_kicker]

Any update on notam , no firing yet ?

No idea bro maybe others know

 

[omaebakabaka]

I have a suspicion that after what happened last year many countries have resumed their dormant programs relating to the same

To my point earlier, it requires offence, defence and very important intelligence and since this is very specialized field it requires a complete new set up and directly report to PM, DM and COAS.

 

[Lonewolf]

No idea bro maybe others know

Any idea of expdr ,lrcv project ,some guy was asking about it on @NeXoft007 twitter handle.

I think it might be something related to tsto type vehicle for reconnaissance and maybe a missile instead .

Pulse detonation aregood for mach 5 speed , ramjet coupled with it can provide succeeding speed .

I remember maybe you or some other guy posted about pulse detonation from drdo , can it something like Lockheed skunk works blackswift project

 

[FalconSlayers]

On the issue of corona virus which is alleged to be bio-engineered for offensive use, its ramifications should be taken very seriously I believe its high time to rethink on offensive biological warfare program as a deterrence or as analogue to Russian 'dead hand' fail-deadly & mutual assured destruction deterrence.

IMO nuclear weapons cannot guarantee protection against biological weapons because there will be literally no survivors if a country comes under biological attack.

Even if India is hit with 200 nukes there will be many survivors, with biological weapons literally no survivors over a period of time.

Eg if 1 kg of highly refined botulinum toxin is released & dispersed evenly by wind in all directions it is more than enough to kill 1 billion people if breathed in by them.

AFAIK bio-warfare agents have a pre-engineered oxidation life. Eg say botulinum toxin has been engineered to have a oxidation life of 72 hours

It means it will stay virulent for 72 hours & will kill everything within that time period after which it will lose virulence High possibility local mutations might occur leading to continued virulence in few effected areas, but a sensible country will never develop a deadly biological agent without simultaneously developing an antidote for the same to cater for own safety & unforseen complications during possible use, unless they are as dumbfucks as who you know

I have a suspicion that after what happened last year many countries have resumed their dormant programs relating to the same

I’ve heard that we disposed off our Chemical Weapons under UN which was the world’s largest chemical weapons stockpile, and all of it was mustard gas, the deadliest chemical weapon. Is it true?