airstrike99
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2021
- Messages
- 1,091
- Likes
- 4,748
who the hell gets a feeling of deja vu over a defence related discussion except for retards.Wow. Why I am getting a feeling of Deja Vu here?
No one cares about Gun range increment? Which gentleman in IA told you so?
If no one cares about increment in gun range, then why the FARP formulated in 1999 after Kargil, IA asked for more range in its future guns?
Why have the FH-77B which performed so well in Kargil seen a caliber increment in Dhanush?
Why ATAGS has seen further caliber increment then Dhanush?
If you want to talk about logic and all, we could talk more. But please don't bring whatever is in your mind with the tag that people in ground wants that.
this is 2021 not 1999. if are on defensive detterence, you prepare according to your enemy. even if the chinki cheese dont use the newly made A-300 mbrl with range over 200km to 250km. they can still use BRE3/ FD140A warhead rockets with a range of 130km. while both the pinaka and smerch have only a max range of 90km. they can still attack leh from g219 road. of course we can destroy them after but still they get to attack us first while we dont have a detterence weapon at standoff distance.
talking about artillery guns. to have an increased range. you need to increase projectile velocity. artillery shells have a projectile barrel velocity of mach 3-5 depending on whether its howitzer or long barreled flat trajectory guns.
how the hell can you use flat trajectory guns in high mountain terrain. and how the hell can you increase the range of a howitzer, without increasing barrel length.
the more faster you want to launch the shells, the larger they have to be. because it depends on propellant surface area in contact. in otger words you cannot have a long straw like propellant. its should have a larger diameter, comparable to length maximum. l< or = to 7d. because propellant burning follows pioberts law. there is also helmholtz mixing at internal control surfaces of combustion gases during expansion. there are graphs of pressure vs time where it reaches a peak at certain milli seconds after which propellant burnout occurs before which the shell should leave the barrel.
long story short, the diameter of shell also has to increase if you want to increase length of barrel in turn also have more ammunition charges/ powder in turn the extra reinforcement at combustion section of the gun in turn more weight.
finally you will end up having a rail gun like schewer gustav weight 1350 tonnes with a range of 47km and rocket assisted range of over 120km to 150km (also by decreasing the explosive mass)
or the system 350 project babylon super gun by saddam hussein designed by canadian engg gerald bull. weight of 2100 tonnes with range of 1000km and 350mm bore.
or finally a soviet br 5 1939mortar of 280mm with a range of 10km weighting 18 tonnes.
good luck trying to achieve mach 7 to reach extended ranges cuz the steel or titanium barrel will be wrecked after a couple of shots. ramjet will only extend for a will since ramjet will kick in after some time of leaving the barrel. but still ramjet is mach 3 to 4 same as ordinary shell except there is continuous propulsion instead of a ballistic shot like the ordinary shells.
if you have any knowledge of rockect and spacecraft propulsions, turbomachinery for aircraft engines, armament engineering along with the ordinary mechanical engineering degree, you wouldnt talk nonsense.