Arty is good enough for WLRs, is it not? ELINT should be able to triangulate the coordinates of enemy WLR and we could use ATAGS firing GPS/NAVIC guided munitions to take it out. WLR will usually be closer to the TBA, but if it is further away, maybe a special anti-radiatoin warhead can be developed for the Prahaar missile system. Either way, it is cheaper than buying a land-launched version of Rudram-1
The problem is how are you going to move your anti-radiation missile launcher within 150km range of enemy's radar. These radars are not deploying in the front, there are plenty of strike forces stationed to protect them.
One must learn to crawl before one can attempt to run , there is always a progression to technology and capability.@Bleh @patriots @fire starter @porky_kicker @Karthi
can somebody please answer few of my question?
why can't they make Rustom stealthier ???
from 16,000ft or the proposed 26,000 ft, will it be able to find tanks, artillery, missiles batteries, enemy radars and foot soldiers from that height?
will it be able to provide fire corrections and guidance to our artillery fire from such height?
will it be able to lase/guide incoming missiles from that height?
8rs of flight, 16000ft is very good achievement. but I feel it needs stealth.
@Bleh @patriots @fire starter @porky_kicker @Karthi
can somebody please answer few of my question?
why can't they make Rustom stealthier ???
from 16,000ft or the proposed 26,000 ft, will it be able to find tanks, artillery, missiles batteries, enemy radars and foot soldiers from that height?
will it be able to provide fire corrections and guidance to our artillery fire from such height?
will it be able to lase/guide incoming missiles from that height?
8rs of flight, 16000ft is very good achievement. but I feel it needs stealth.
But bro at ladakh region most of our assets are in higher altitude...also chineese assets too@Bleh @patriots @fire starter @porky_kicker @Karthi
can somebody please answer few of my question?
why can't they make Rustom stealthier ???
from 16,000ft or the proposed 26,000 ft, will it be able to find tanks, artillery, missiles batteries, enemy radars and foot soldiers from that height?
will it be able to provide fire corrections and guidance to our artillery fire from such height?
will it be able to lase/guide incoming missiles from that height?
8rs of flight, 16000ft is very good achievement. but I feel it needs stealth.
May be something new may come out from HAL stable with their HTFE 25, quicker and built ground up for low altitude ops.
A new aircraft is being designed by ade .....might be a turbofan uav ....
A hale uav??
Stealth is achieved mostly by the shape of Aircraft , so it is not possible to make tapas more stealthy without changing its entire design .@Bleh @patriots @fire starter @porky_kicker @Karthi
can somebody please answer few of my question?
why can't they make Rustom stealthier ???
from 16,000ft or the proposed 26,000 ft, will it be able to find tanks, artillery, missiles batteries, enemy radars and foot soldiers from that height?
will it be able to provide fire corrections and guidance to our artillery fire from such height?
will it be able to lase/guide incoming missiles from that height?
8rs of flight, 16000ft is very good achievement. but I feel it needs stealth.
No idea. Bhai ....
I think he meant 'stealthier' (relative), not stealthy (absolute).Stealth is achieved mostly by the shape of Aircraft , so it is not possible to make tapas more stealthy without changing its entire design .
How can the current model be made stealthier without radical design changes.....Relative to What ? Absolute stealthy tapas UAV is not even possible with current design. , They would have to modify its design for reducing radar reflections.
.
By using composite materials.
It's already composite AFAIK. @utubekhiladi would be aware of all that. He is talking about incrementals in the current model.
