FalconZero
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2020
- Messages
- 3,782
- Likes
- 19,757
some are saying IAF will test BVRAAM, we will get to know....Any idea about this? What's being tested?
some are saying IAF will test BVRAAM, we will get to know....Any idea about this? What's being tested?
Could be SFDR based BVRAny idea about this? What's being tested?
They need Gemba Kaizen. Yesterday.Dhanush rammer assembly
View attachment 60572
Look at the ofb jig , local mechanic ke garage me is se behtar quality ka jig milega. And look at the unclean surroundings , safai nahi rakh sakte chutiyas.
Haramkhoro ka ye halat hai , aur bat karte hai world class products banane ka , phele to world class jigs or equipments bano uske baad usme se world class weapons nikalega . Chutiyas
Caan you imagine such equipments and jigs and unclean environment in a western or japanese factory, QC ka to ammi chudiya . Chutiyas
Nuclear warhead for SAM? Why?First, where have I mentioned about 100's of bombers attacking us simultaneously. I have only said if one squadron of enemy planes attack. A squadron in IAF practice means maximum of 18 to 20 aircraft. First clear your mind.
Did you answer my question - if our airspace is going to be violated by a technologically superior enemy using 5th and 6th generation planes which cannot be countered by our air defence network, should we just bend over and surrender.
Why are you against India fielding nuclear capable Sam's?. Do you know a 0.2 kt nuclear blast would have a direct blast effect on only a few hundred meters. We would not be detonating on land but several thousand feet in the air. Our national airspace extends a bit beyond our land borders. So the nuclear blast could well be over the sea. Even talk of India possessing such a capability will make an potential adversary think 10 times before contemplating bombing in India using manned planes.
The militaries of the world still have thousands of manned aircraft.
Whose side are you on, man.
When there is talk of India building ICBM's we hear voices in the country saying it is unnecessary. Why this attempt to derail our strategic choices.
As I mentioned earlier this option will be exercised only in extraordinary circumstances.
Simply repeating
'Good luck in nuking your own country
Good luck in nuking your own country'
does not make you any smarter.
You have woken up very late to the discussion. Go through all the posts.Nuclear warhead for SAM? Why?
Are you aware of EMP? You want India to go back to stone age? Because that's what will happen with an airburst nuke.
Reposting , should answer most of your queries , exact range of EO pod is not known , but it is greater than or equal to 40 km@Bleh @patriots @fire starter @porky_kicker @Karthi
can somebody please answer few of my question?
why can't they make Rustom stealthier ???
from 16,000ft or the proposed 26,000 ft, will it be able to find tanks, artillery, missiles batteries, enemy radars and foot soldiers from that height?
will it be able to provide fire corrections and guidance to our artillery fire from such height?
will it be able to lase/guide incoming missiles from that height?
8rs of flight, 16000ft is very good achievement. but I feel it needs stealth.
That one is a old pic from 2018 timeline appeared in the likes of livefist
YupIs that supposed to be the target after impact
Wheeler island is moderately big in size with decent vegetation(along with high n low grounds) so pics taken from certain camera angles may looks like its in mainland.The target was supposed to be on wheeler island.