TBH guided mortars not worth the headache. Get guided arty and airburst mortars as standard and it will do fine.Israel using laser guided 120mm mortar's. Did Drdo doing anything on guided mortar's? Or guided 70mm heli rockets?
Detection is one aspect, identifying is other.It's low frequency radar isn't it . Which means can detect stealthy aircraft ?
If it's going to be typically between 500-1000 kms it'd serve a limited purpose though that's needed as well. We need 2000-3000 kms conventional range missiles in bulk qty to deter Chinese rocket forces attacks on targets in mainland India.
What is the cost to upgrade these beatdown AKs' and INSAS by companies like FabD or SSS?
hain ? isn't this the same exact upgrade kit that FAB Defence of Israel was offering in past ?
Unfortunately doesn't work that way.If it's going to be typically between 500-1000 kms it'd serve a limited purpose though that's needed as well. We need 2000-3000 kms conventional range missiles in bulk qty to deter Chinese rocket forces attacks on targets in mainland India.
In any case we need all such missiles in qtys ranging between 2-3000 per missile at least .
Another lying thieving member of a no good race which specialises only in lying & thieving, who doesn't comprehend what's written thanks to another no good app his no good people have come up with , which like which most things they've come with , translates less & omits more. .Unfortunately doesn't work that way.
1. Due to Himalaya mountains, most of India land based early warning radar will not be able to detect the Chinese rocket in early rising stage. So the whole network will lose about 5-10 minutes warning time for long range incoming rocket. For those targets close to the border, the possible scenario is: the time the alarm rings is the time you see the short missiles are diving towards you. That is why Tibet is so important to India strategically.
2. Defense missiles are far more expensive than ordinary ballistic missiles, and generally you have to launch 2 defense missiles against one ballistic missile. Considering both countries' manufacturing capability and current missiles numbers, you either bankrupt yourselves before the war comes or be overwhelmed by the enemy.
He said deter not counter.Unfortunately doesn't work that way.
1. Due to Himalaya mountains, most of India land based early warning radar will not be able to detect the Chinese rocket in early rising stage. So the whole network will lose about 5-10 minutes warning time for long range incoming rocket. For those targets close to the border, the possible scenario is: the time the alarm rings is the time you see the short missiles are diving towards you. That is why Tibet is so important to India strategically.
2. Defense missiles are far more expensive than ordinary ballistic missiles, and generally you have to launch 2 defense missiles against one ballistic missile. Considering both countries' manufacturing capability and current missiles numbers, you either bankrupt yourselves before the war comes or be overwhelmed by the enemy.
These are ballistic missiles we are talking about and as their name suggest, they happen to follow a ballistic flight path. So, radars positioned atop the peaks of the Himalayan ranges can easily detect them at sufficient ranges. After all, these are not terrain hugging cruise missiles, now are they?? So, this section of your argument is entirely based on your total lack of comprehension of this topic and not on facts.Unfortunately doesn't work that way.
1. Due to Himalaya mountains, most of India land based early warning radar will not be able to detect the Chinese rocket in early rising stage. So the whole network will lose about 5-10 minutes warning time for long range incoming rocket. For those targets close to the border, the possible scenario is: the time the alarm rings is the time you see the short missiles are diving towards you.
True but you've gotta keep in mind that TAR is a featureless barren wasteland of a plateau, with practically no way of concealing any significant deployment of forces, so you can forget about achieving any kind of surprise.That is why Tibet is so important to India strategically.
Not necessarily!! One doesn't need to employ expensive high-end SAM systems like Barak 8 or S-400 to counter ballistic missiles of that range class. And mid range SAMs like Akash cost a lot less than such medium range BMs that are employed by the PLA rocket forces.2. Defense missiles are far more expensive than ordinary ballistic missiles,
That's the rule of thumb, yes.and generally you have to launch 2 defense missiles against one ballistic missile.
Or we can just take a page out of the Vietcong's doctrine and go underground and wait out the Chinese firestorm. Here, check this out - https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...s-in-ladakh/story-4RVVPMjeofhzB9kUQCKTeL.htmlConsidering both countries' manufacturing capability and current missiles numbers, you either bankrupt yourselves before the war comes or be overwhelmed by the enemy.
I don't think this is gonna deter the CCP if they do make up their mind to punish us for some reason. The need of the hour is to build up an extensive network of underground infrastructure all along the LAC while simultaneously working overtime towards strengthening our economy.He said deter not counter.
Also, wouldn't early warning satellites be able to detect the launch, irrespective of the Himalayas?There is a lot to unpack here, so let's get started in earnest.
These are ballistic missiles we are talking about and as their name suggest, they happen to follow a ballistic flight path. So, radars positioned atop the peaks of the Himalayan ranges can easily detect them at sufficient ranges. After all, these are not terrain hugging cruise missiles, now are they?? So, this section of your argument is entirely based on your total lack of comprehension of this topic and not on facts.
True but you've gotta keep in mind that TAR is a featureless barren wasteland of a plateau, with practically no way of concealing any significant deployment of forces, so you can forget about achieving any kind of surprise.
Not necessarily!! One doesn't need to employ expensive high-end SAM systems like Barak 8 or S-400 to counter ballistic missiles of that range class. And mid range SAMs like Akash and the likes of ESSMs (I know we don't use ESSMs but the upcoming VLSRSAM relies on the same principle i.e repurposing BVRAAMs as SAMs) cost a lot less than such medium range BMs that are employed by the PLA rocket forces.
That's the rule of thumb, yes.
Or we can just take a page out of the Vietcong's doctrine and go underground and wait out the Chinese firestorm. Here, check this out - https://www.hindustantimes.com/indi...s-in-ladakh/story-4RVVPMjeofhzB9kUQCKTeL.html
Of course.Also, wouldn't early warning satellites be able to detect the launch, irrespective of the Himalayas?
Si vis pacem parabellum as it is said .. if we had no way of making a response they can punish us easily .I don't think this is gonna deter the CCP if they do make up their mind to punish us for some reason. The need of the hour is to build up an extensive network of underground infrastructure all along the LAC while simultaneously working overtime towards strengthening our economy.
Absolutely. There is no denying that we need to build up our own rocket forces and build it up to such an extent that they remember our retaliation for generations but they won't act as a deterrent once the shooting begins is all I'm saying.Si vis pacem parabellum as it is said .. if we had no way of making a response they can punish us easily .
But practically a reason they need large a rocket forces to begin with is the limited payload of their aircraft flying out of Tibet.
I know we've had this argument before but why don't you think it'd act as a deterrent. There are 2 aspects to this - one is the rocket forces targetting infrastructure & all our bases between 2-300 kms on our side of the LAC. Unfortunately for us a good deal of our cities also fall in this targetting zone. Do remember Delhi is not more than 500 kms from the LAC as the crow flies.Absolutely. There is no denying that we need to build up our own rocket forces and build it up to such an extent that they remember our retaliation for generations but they won't act as a deterrent once the shooting begins is all I'm saying.