To clarify things here, I have no issue with 4-5km range for Spike lR with uncooled seeker but as range increases more contrast is needed and hence good cooling is needed. So, Spike ER version with 10-16km range is SUS where no external cooling is provided, doesn't that posses problem in target acquisition at such long ranges.
Let's be clear that each ir/iir seeker has a cooldown time which once active continues to provide clear image for x amount of time and after that image contrast decreases significantly, according to above point in reply, it stops working. Usually this time is less than minute for smaller man portable systems, more inorders of 30 around secs, AAMs like R73 have their own cryogenic cooler while manportable ones don't.
Javelin ATGM has a BCU in its launch tube while there's no sign of such thing remotely on a spike Lr or even ER version launch tube assembly.
View attachment 195146
So, here's the thing I believe Spike failed trials in Indian Deserts and Javelin passed as we know from trials conducted far back. And it also begs the question about the effectiveness of Spike missile in Fire n Forget operation.
For Javelin, Operator sees target through CLU, activates BCU and as BCU can provide a total 4 min of cooling, allows for multiple target acquisitions if initial acquisition is not achieved by seeker. Also better contrast. Now operator sees target through CLU and then activates IR seeker, now switches to seeker view and on acquiring, fires it and the missile flies. Seeker cooldown time starts and within cooldown time, missile flies to target, hits it and mission done.
For spike, no BCU. Operator sees the target through CLU, switches to tv seeker view, and tries to acquire it, he can then either fire the missile on acquisition or on grid reference here or he can try to acquire it through iir seeker too, he presses the button to acquire the target and cooldown time starts even before flying, so hence the countdown starts and if target not acquired within first limited seconds, seeker is rendered ineffective for long range acquisition and only seeker remaining is tv seeker. Or he can fire the missile on grid or with tv seeker and then he can press the button to acquire target through iir seeker and there are limited amount of times it can reacquire target depending on contrast through man in the loop on independently.
First of all ability of tv seeker to acquire and keep track of targets at long range is not better than that of IIR seeker.
Now this shows how man in the loop capability for Spike is essential feature for it for the way it was designed since design doesn't allows wiggle room for iir seeker target acquisition.
Disadvantage being that in low contrast environment the uncooled iir seeker is very ineffective. Also very low attempts of target acquisition is also problematic. And after first few attempts,, IIR seeker is rendered ineffective or let's just say low effective.
And that's why probably Javelin passed desert trials in India and Spike did not bcoz of the way Javelin missile has a cooled seeker and a BCU which helps a lot for low contrast targets.
Which then ultimately leads me to question if MPATGM has some sort of internal micro cooler for its IIR seeker. I don't see any kind of BCU on its launch tube from prototype pics.
This also leads to the question of what about this new NAGmk2 programme.
And Doesn't this makes Spike ER a situational Fire n Forget missile depending on initial target acquisition by IIR seeker and environmental conditions. Where operator might need to use man in the loop option to acquire target on the final approach of missile on fire on grid target command, if the initial lock is not achieved. 10-16km range seems already too big for a uncooled seeker.p