Hm hlft looks like
Well for one OFB never innovated on anything. Even the lighter MAG we are seeing in 1st pic is ARDE designed. Now just see that even after having some of the best designs in the world present, ARDE has come up with this sorry ass of piece in 2020+, maybe be good for 2010+ but not certainly for now.Wonder why OFB never bothered with a longer handguard and an adjustable stock for the MAG
like what Norinco did and in a lighter package too
Khaganthak Glide Bomb by JSR Dynamics (posting pic’s directly again as @porky_kicker loves deleting posts on SM after a short duration.
Here see this for more pics and products profile.Khaganthak Glide Bomb by JSR Dynamics (posting pic’s directly again as @porky_kicker loves deleting posts on SM after a short duration.
View attachment 187143View attachment 187144
View attachment 187145
Possibly Light Weight Cruise Missile.
View attachment 187146
CFD of Glide Bombs separation from SU-30MKI and warheads of various missiles of JSR Missiles on the racks.
They had shown some of their plansKhaganthak Glide Bomb by JSR Dynamics (posting pic’s directly again as @porky_kicker loves deleting posts on SM after a short duration.
View attachment 187143View attachment 187144
View attachment 187145
Possibly Light Weight Cruise Missile.
View attachment 187146
CFD of Glide Bombs separation from SU-30MKI and warheads of various missiles of JSR Missiles on the racks.
Yeah found itA panelist in a news debate was saying range extension kit costs 1/10th of imported ones . Cant find where i saw it .
I am not sure if the one in the red are VLS. IMO, they can be the exhaust system for the SLS. That might explain their height being on the taller side to protect the surroundings. Not sure though.Not sure if this was discussed here but ins anvesh seems to have two different types of launchers SLS that we already know in yellow and a VLS in red which wasnt known previously...the vls seems to have very large dimensions...could it be our own UVLS?!
View attachment 187059
good point but the vls is named s1,s2... if it was just the exhaust of the same system then i dont think it would have different names but its really hard to tell what it could be from the pics we haveI am not sure if the one in the red are VLS. IMO, they can be the exhaust system for the SLS. That might explain their height being on the taller side to protect the surroundings. Not sure though.
S1 can correspond to the exhaust of VLS named A1. Similarly,good point but the vls is named s1,s2... if it was just the exhaust of the same system then i dont think it would have different names but its really hard to tell what it could be from the pics we have
Vinod Ji is good in PR. Keeping the actual product in the background give everyone else confidence and he is basically selling it on TV lol.Yeah found it
Yup know it but unless a test takes place, all bets are off. Testing in itself would consume a tons of funds and still then there is no guarantee that the user that is armed forces will induct the said system so I don't know how may of them will be successful, that's why let hope be with them.They had shown some of their plans
Also developing 250-300 Km Guided Rockets.
i dont see the need to name exhaust of each cell differently ..they could just keep it A something ....imo different designation here means different purpose(i could be wrong)S1 can correspond to the exhaust of VLS named A1. Similarly,
A2 <-> S2
A3 <-> S3
A4 <-> S4
Question should be asked to IA that why they are not mentioning the required minimum range. Is that not a factor?Just a small question....... Where it is written that IA wants a 50 km range artillery?
In none of the article it is mentioned that IA has sought a 50 km range artillery.
Don't worry, junta will stop asking questions and will approve $$$ for le wunderwaffen import as soon as we get our ass handed to us at the LAC.Question should be asked to IA that why they are not mentioning the required minimum range. Is that not a factor?
Was DRDO conveyed that 40~km range or even 35km would've been fine for IA.
Had the ATAGS weight been less than 15T but range slightly less than ATHOS , imbeciles would've put up a minimum range requirement in RFI instead of Weight,
and then you and I would've been discussing about "where is the weight requirement written"