DRDO, PSU and Private Defence Sector News

Marliii

Better to die on your feet than live on your knees
New Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2020
Messages
5,610
Likes
34,394
Country flag
TBH I don't think so that we should invest in R&D of CIWS types systems too much, these type of technologies are not the most important.

At the very most, we should just import a design and build the system in India under transfer of technology. We already do this with AK-603, we build AK-603s in India itself with more than 95 percent Indigenisation. If IN is still interested in the R&D of an "Indigenous" CIWS then they can do so.

Nonetheless I am of the opinion that we should allocate all our funds & resources in more important projects like nuclear Submarines, Fighter Jets (AMCA, Tejas MK-2, TEDBF etc), missile programs (Astra, Agni, BMD etc) etc.
You know CIWS is the last defence for any warship,airbase against missiles if all else fail?every fucking thing is important from trucks that do the logistics to nuclear submarine all are important
 

Okabe Rintarou

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,338
Likes
11,996
Country flag
TBH I don't think so that we should invest in R&D of CIWS types systems too much, these type of technologies are not the most important.

At the very most, we should just import a design and build the system in India under transfer of technology. We already do this with AK-603, we build AK-603s in India itself with more than 95 percent Indigenisation. If IN is still interested in the R&D of an "Indigenous" CIWS then they can do so.

Nonetheless I am of the opinion that we should allocate all our funds & resources in more important projects like nuclear Submarines, Fighter Jets (AMCA, Tejas MK-2, TEDBF etc), missile programs (Astra, Agni, BMD etc) etc.
  1. We are upgrading CIWS to a missile-cannon system from a cannon-only, so better to do it on our own instead of importing and then waiting two decades for (in)complete ToT.
  2. Moreover, we need CIWS-type system to act as our C-RAM system on land, which will be the backbone of our Anti-drone defences, which are pretty damn important.
  3. Moreover, DRDO MPDMS is already happening no matter what, so leverage it, reuse it for the CIWS and that is killing two birds with one funding stone. And that funding isn't much. For capital intensive projects like aero-engines, such funding is peanuts.
  4. Not to mention the export potential these things unlock because otherwise x country can't buy equipment containing subsystems from y country and so if we don't go for 100% indigenization, Indian weapons won't sell aboard and thus won't bring us money, jobs and diplomatic clout we need.
.
So it makes perfect sense to spend on indigenous CIWS.
 

Super Flanker

Aviation and Defence Enthusiast
New Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2021
Messages
5,106
Likes
12,244
Country flag
You know CIWS is the last defence for any warship,airbase against missiles if all else fail?every fucking thing is important from trucks that do the logistics to nuclear submarine all are important
Did I say that we should not have CIWS on our warships? My emphasis was more on projects like nuclear Submarines, aircrafts, missile etc. CIWS is indeed a very crucial thing for a warship as you quoted that it is the last defence for any warship, military base etc, what I am saying is that there are other more important things (which I have already mentioned). Yes everything is important but sometimes some things are more important than others and they should be given higher priority.
  1. We are upgrading CIWS to a missile-cannon system from a cannon-only, so better to do it on our own instead of importing and then waiting two decades for (in)complete ToT.
  2. Moreover, we need CIWS-type system to act as our C-RAM system on land, which will be the backbone of our Anti-drone defences, which are pretty damn important.
  3. Moreover, DRDO MPDMS is already happening no matter what, so leverage it, reuse it for the CIWS and that is killing two birds with one funding stone. And that funding isn't much. For capital intensive projects like aero-engines, such funding is peanuts.
  4. Not to mention the export potential these things unlock because otherwise x country can't buy equipment containing subsystems from y country and so if we don't go for 100% indigenization, Indian weapons won't sell aboard and thus won't bring us money, jobs and diplomatic clout we need.
.
So it makes perfect sense to spend on indigenous CIWS.
I guess this will apply to ejection seats as well? We need to initiate our own program for ejection seats too.

I agree with what you have written but I will stand by my point of view that Higher priority should be given for programs involving things like missiles, warships, fighter aircrafts etc.
 

Okabe Rintarou

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2018
Messages
2,338
Likes
11,996
Country flag
Did I say that we should not have CIWS on our warships? My emphasis was more on projects like nuclear Submarines, aircrafts, missile etc. CIWS is indeed a very crucial thing for a warship as you quoted that it is the last defence for any warship, military base etc, what I am saying is that there are other more important things (which I have already mentioned). Yes everything is important but sometimes some things are more important than others and they should be given higher priority.

I guess this will apply to ejection seats as well? We need to initiate our own program for ejection seats too.

I agree with what you have written but I will stand by my point of view that Higher priority should be given for programs involving things like missiles, warships, fighter aircrafts etc.
CIWS and ejection seats are very different from each other though. Ejection seats have a high learning curve and are a niche technology. CIWS is technologically a lower hanging fruit and, like I mentioned, will be used also in C-RAM and MANPADS. And will be produced in the thousands and given the drone hysteria, can also be sold abroad as potent anti-drone system to even countries without large military budgets.
Agree with your larger point that higher priority should be given to strategic systems. But that has already been happening. Cases where it doesn't happen (transport aircraft, aero-engines, fabs and photolithography, etc), the capital investment is too damn high.Otherwise all strategic projects are funded.
 

Anibesh acharya

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2022
Messages
145
Likes
928
Does someone have any info(plans or any intention) on an indigenous rotary canon type CIWS in development by DRDO or are we satisfied with the AK-630s?
I have always wondered why we don't already have an indigenous CIWS like the Phalanx, alternatively we would have the freedom to convert it at will as a 'counter artillery, mortar or rocket' weapon system and probably use it on the LOC to frustrate Pakis.
Consecutively, if we already had an indigenous CIWS, we could increase the number of barrels like the Chinese did with the Type 730(7 Barrels)or have a dual gun system like the Kashtan or the AK-630-M2.

US Phalanx C-RAM for counter artillery, mortar or rocket.


The monstrous AK-630M-2 DUET o_O
There are some options available with local and foreign collaboration


 

dfcool

New Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Messages
1,593
Likes
12,040
Country flag
So it did get launched today..
=======
3rd Stealth Frigate of Project 17 A (TARAGIRI) launched at @MazagonDockLtd
. Built using Integrated construction methodology involving hull blocks construction in different geographical locations & integration/erection on Slipway

Yes it was launched, BUT no celebrations, no photo-ops, no livestream.

My friend who was there sent shared video, I thought frigates are small but its freaking big

for comparison
ins visakhapatnam tonnage - 7,400
ins TARAGIRI firgate tonnage - 6,670 (just 10% less than a destroyer)
 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
Yes it was launched, BUT no celebrations, no photo-ops, no livestream.

My friend who was there sent shared video, I thought frigates are small but its freaking big

for comparison
ins visakhapatnam tonnage - 7,400
ins TARAGIRI firgate tonnage - 6,670 (just 10% less than a destroyer)
Did he asked about commissioning?
 

SUPERPOWER

New Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
1,488
Likes
5,302
Country flag
Yes it was launched, BUT no celebrations, no photo-ops, no livestream.

My friend who was there sent shared video, I thought frigates are small but its freaking big

for comparison
ins visakhapatnam tonnage - 7,400
ins TARAGIRI firgate tonnage - 6,670 (just 10% less than a destroyer)
Thats why we are coming up with 13000 tons destroyer...
 

ShukantC

New Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2021
Messages
117
Likes
755
Country flag
So it did get launched today..
=======
3rd Stealth Frigate of Project 17 A (TARAGIRI) launched at @MazagonDockLtd
. Built using Integrated construction methodology involving hull blocks construction in different geographical locations & integration/erection on Slipway

By the way with all the integrated / modular construction what has been the improvement in the construction timelines(from laying down to commissioning) can anyone answer?????
 

dfcool

New Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2022
Messages
1,593
Likes
12,040
Country flag
Did he asked about commissioning?
here are commissioning dates and good overall info


So it did get launched today..
=======
3rd Stealth Frigate of Project 17 A (TARAGIRI) launched at @MazagonDockLtd
. Built using Integrated construction methodology involving hull blocks construction in different geographical locations & integration/erection on Slipway

looks like this is 5th stealth frigate, we already launched 4 previously, 7 frigates in total

our navy veterans are out of touch these days 😑

 

Lonewolf

Psychopathic Neighbour
New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2021
Messages
7,365
Likes
27,771
Country flag
here are commissioning dates and good overall info



looks like this is 5th stealth frigate, we already launched 4 previously, 7 frigates in total

our navy veterans are out of touch these days 😑

3rd of MDL
 

AnantS

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
5,890
Likes
15,774
Country flag
Russian India MTA that was supposed to enter production and replace India's aging Russian fleet by 2015-20.


It has been 8 years with no real progress in this particular front. Seems like the preliminary designs were already completed.IMO we were the development/production partners so we must have access to those designs.

We should have worked on our own MTA rather than reinventing the wheel with Saras Mk2.
After wasting more than decade we withdrew from mta prog some time back.
 

Srinie

New Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2021
Messages
136
Likes
903
Country flag

Anibesh acharya

New Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2022
Messages
145
Likes
928
Encouraging reports from article

graph.jpg


250km missile caught my eye . Along with that it mentions about loitering munitions , swarm drone ,
new generation mines , 150km guided pinaka, drone based mine detection and neutralization etc .
 

Articles

Top