The issue is also that 155mm M46 upgrade is a field gun, not a howitzer. That may be why they are dithering on upgrading the rest of them.
Nope, the upgraded ones are in fact, howitzers.
I now hate towed guns , extra trucks more fuel etc
I have a wicked plan,
View attachment 163881
Convert m46 to 155 mm standards. Slap it on a tank chassy,
And you get a respectable 155 mm artillery gun .
Which can move .
Going exclusively for mounted gun systems would not be such a great idea in my humble opinion both from a cost as well as operational perspective, especially for a country with thousands of kilometers of broken mountainous borders to guard.
Just ask yourself this one question - what is the biggest selling point for the SPGs?? The answer is their mobility, which allows them to quickly change reposition after firing a salvo, right?? Now, in the mountains, do you really think the terrain will be conducive for making such extensive maneuvers?? Heck, there are sectors along both LAC and the LoC where often you can't even find enough room to deploy a whole battery worth of towed guns as a single unit and have to place them far from each other!! Under such circumstances, the most significant advantage of an SPG will be completely negated and they will, in fact, become a burden.
Besides, they are a lot heavier; therefore, it'd be a lot more difficult to redeploy them from one sector to another compared to towed pieces.
As for fuel, SPGs will provide no additional benefit whatsoever cause they will burn just as much fuel (much more if we are talking about tracked SPGs) as the towing vehicles.
Convert m46 to 155 mm standards. Slap it on a tank chassy,
And you get a respectable 155 mm artillery gun .
Which can move .
For the plains of Punjab Rajasthan, a great idea indeed. But not for the mountains, except in Ladakh for which the Army is supposed to order an additional 200 K9 Vajras.