Kuldeepm952
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2019
- Messages
- 947
- Likes
- 4,969
Fire and update capability of spike is really impressive, hope to see mpatgm variant with it, BING CHILLING
Only if we could quantify those values and present the comparison wrt to MPATGM otherwise i don't see any point of it being posted here, can you share the weight of launcher of Spike shoulder launched variant?Here I present to you, the epitome of fnf 3rd gen atgm, try to beat this in compactness, weight and shoulder fire ability, produced since 2001:
Type 01 lmat is 11.4+17.5=28.9 kg. MPATGM is 14.5+14.5=29 kg, how is the former lighter?Ye lo bhaiya maje Karo, missile weight 14.5 kg without LAUNCH TUBE and another 14.25 kg for other shits, total system weight with tripod easily 30kgs. Aap kha rhete h, this info is quite known. It's a pretty bulky system, just see the total weight of type 01lmat system, you will be surprised.View attachment 131349
Type 01 LMATYe lo bhaiya maje Karo, missile weight 14.5 kg without LAUNCH TUBE and another 14.25 kg for other shits, total system weight with tripod easily 30kgs. Aap kha rhete h, this info is quite known. It's a pretty bulky system, just see the total weight of type 01lmat system, you will be surprised.View attachment 131349
japs are most of the times ahead of usType 01 LMAT
Missile weight 11.7 kg
System weight 17.5 kg
Edit:Type 01 LMAT
The Type 01 LMAT (01式軽対戦車誘導弾, 01-shiki kei-tai-sensha yūdō-dan?) is a Japanese man-portable fire-and-forget anti-tank missile. Development began in 1993 at Kawasaki Heavy Industries and was accepted into service in 2001. During development, the missile was designated with the codename XATM-5.[4]...military-history.fandom.com
MPATGM- Missile + Launcher System-Under 30 kg
Type 01 LMAT- 29.2 kg.
* Jap range is 4km
we never tried JV for Turbofan engine technologiesjaps are most of the times ahead of us
Any idea as to why the Indian missile would be longer by 330 mm compared to the Japanese one?Type 01 lmat is 11.4+17.5=28.9 kg. MPATGM is 14.5+14.5=29 kg, how is the former lighter?
View attachment 131374
no idea, even when its stated range is higher at 4 km. Min range is however 400m as compared to 200m for MPATGMAny idea as to why the Indian missile would be longer by 330 mm compared to the Japanese one?
I have previously read that MPATGM has a range of 200m-4km. Probably they max out the range at 2.5km for deserts.no idea, even when its stated range is higher at 4 km. Min range is however 400m as compared to 200m for MPATGM
Ankhon m phenyl dalna pda. Yeh kya likh rhe ho.Type 01 lmat is 11.4+17.5=28.9 kg. MPATGM is 14.5+14.5=29 kg, how is the former lighter?
View attachment 131374
Official source or brochure for 4km range of mpatgm. Even drdo site says 2.5km?? I would be the happiest person if it's actually 4km.no idea, even when its stated range is higher at 4 km. Min range is however 400m as compared to 200m for MPATGM
It's type01 lmat, not spike. Weight of complete firing unit at 17.5 kg, lightest and shortest in class. Baaki aap search kar le.Only if we could quantify those values and present the comparison wrt to MPATGM otherwise i don't see any point of it being posted here, can you share the weight of launcher of Spike shoulder launched variant?
Mpatgm has a range limitation to 2.5 km unlike its contemporaries because it is a missile made to fire in lock on before launch mode only. Spike lr2, Mmp missile can fire up to 5 km because all of them have Fibre optics connections and can be fired on lock on after fire mode. The range of Mpatgm is a Fire control issue and not a propulsion limitation.Here's a comparision of fnf 2.5km range atgms whole system:-
1.) Mpatgm- 28.75kg, tripod weight not included, brochure mentions 14.5kg weight for missile(not including missile tube) and 14.25kg for TAS, taking tripod weight at 2.8kg that of spike and a 1.5kg fibreglass missile tube, total mpatgm weight comes to around 33kgs.
2.) Type01 lmat- 17.5kg, shoulder fired, japan
3.) Raybolt- 20kg, shoulder fired, south korean
4.) Javelin- 22.3kg old clu, 19.1kg new clu
5.) Spike Mr- 26.8kg old gen, new gen likely to be lighter, tripod launched
Now, how the hell our missile weighs more than other modern missiles while having practically less range than spike lr having more range.
Also, 14.5kg for TAS(Includes clu,thermal and other shits integrated) is really too much when clu of all atgms weight at average of 6kgs, new javelin clu at measly 3.2kgs. Only old spike clu was 12.5 kgs, new ones are lighter like others.
Here's another one MMP atgm development started in 2010, whole tripod+clu+battery weighs 11 kg and ou clu only weighs 14.25kg and mpatgm development started much later.
Drdo was supposed to put contemporary atgm quality product. Infact we started the fnf 3rd gen mpatgm late of all and still got the worst of all.
For uniformed man portable fnf atgm main components are:- (missile including launch tube)+(clu or tas)+(tripod if needed).
MPATGM should be inducted in batches and a new contemporary variant should be developed like that of MMP and spike lr2, lighter, multi target, networked and fire on grid n update capability.
A good first try worth inducting in large numbers unless next variant is made.View attachment 131423
View attachment 131422
Weight of MPATGM tripod+CLU+battery+thermal sight is 14.25 kg.Here's a comparision of fnf 2.5km range atgms whole system:-
1.) Mpatgm- 28.75kg, tripod weight not included, brochure mentions 14.5kg weight for missile(not including missile tube) and 14.25kg for TAS, taking tripod weight at 2.8kg that of spike and a 1.5kg fibreglass missile tube, total mpatgm weight comes to around 33kgs.
2.) Type01 lmat- 17.5kg, shoulder fired, japan
3.) Raybolt- 20kg, shoulder fired, south korean
4.) Javelin- 22.3kg old clu, 19.1kg new clu
5.) Spike Mr- 26.8kg old gen, new gen likely to be lighter, tripod launched
Now, how the hell our missile weighs more than other modern missiles while having practically less range than spike lr having more range.
Also, 14.5kg for TAS(Includes clu,thermal and other shits integrated) is really too much when clu of all atgms weight at average of 6kgs, new javelin clu at measly 3.2kgs. Only old spike clu was 12.5 kgs, new ones are lighter like others.
Here's another one MMP atgm development started in 2010, whole tripod+clu+battery weighs 11 kg and ou clu only weighs 14.25kg and mpatgm development started much later.
Drdo was supposed to put contemporary atgm quality product. Infact we started the fnf 3rd gen mpatgm late of all and still got the worst of all.
For uniformed man portable fnf atgm main components are:- (missile including launch tube)+(clu or tas)+(tripod if needed).
MPATGM should be inducted in batches and a new contemporary variant should be developed like that of MMP and spike lr2, lighter, multi target, networked and fire on grid n update capability.
A good first try worth inducting in large numbers unless next variant is made.View attachment 131423
View attachment 131422
Such a nice kitty , I will never fight her , she can win.Here's a comparision of fnf 2.5km range atgms whole system:-
1.) Mpatgm- 28.75kg, tripod weight not included, brochure mentions 14.5kg weight for missile(not including missile tube) and 14.25kg for TAS, taking tripod weight at 2.8kg that of spike and a 1.5kg fibreglass missile tube, total mpatgm weight comes to around 33kgs.
2.) Type01 lmat- 17.5kg, shoulder fired, japan
3.) Raybolt- 20kg, shoulder fired, south korean
4.) Javelin- 22.3kg old clu, 19.1kg new clu
5.) Spike Mr- 26.8kg old gen, new gen likely to be lighter, tripod launched
Now, how the hell our missile weighs more than other modern missiles while having practically less range than spike lr having more range.
Also, 14.5kg for TAS(Includes clu,thermal and other shits integrated) is really too much when clu of all atgms weight at average of 6kgs, new javelin clu at measly 3.2kgs. Only old spike clu was 12.5 kgs, new ones are lighter like others.
Here's another one MMP atgm development started in 2010, whole tripod+clu+battery weighs 11 kg and ou clu only weighs 14.25kg and mpatgm development started much later.
Drdo was supposed to put contemporary atgm quality product. Infact we started the fnf 3rd gen mpatgm late of all and still got the worst of all.
For uniformed man portable fnf atgm main components are:- (missile including launch tube)+(clu or tas)+(tripod if needed).
MPATGM should be inducted in batches and a new contemporary variant should be developed like that of MMP and spike lr2, lighter, multi target, networked and fire on grid n update capability.
A good first try worth inducting in large numbers unless next variant is made.View attachment 131423
View attachment 131422
I am glad General Bipin Rawat's ghost was able to take time from heaven to attend this meeting.The meeting was attended by many Defence Ministry officials including the Chief of Defence Staff, General Bipin Rawat.
Western countries are inducting fifth generation ATGMs, DRDO is testing a third generation ATGM.Here's a comparision of fnf 2.5km range atgms whole system:-
1.) Mpatgm- 28.75kg, tripod weight not included, brochure mentions 14.5kg weight for missile(not including missile tube) and 14.25kg for TAS, taking tripod weight at 2.8kg that of spike and a 1.5kg fibreglass missile tube, total mpatgm weight comes to around 33kgs.
2.) Type01 lmat- 17.5kg, shoulder fired, japan
3.) Raybolt- 20kg, shoulder fired, south korean
4.) Javelin- 22.3kg old clu, 19.1kg new clu
5.) Spike Mr- 26.8kg old gen, new gen likely to be lighter, tripod launched
Now, how the hell our missile weighs more than other modern missiles while having practically less range than spike lr having more range.
Also, 14.5kg for TAS(Includes clu,thermal and other shits integrated) is really too much when clu of all atgms weight at average of 6kgs, new javelin clu at measly 3.2kgs. Only old spike clu was 12.5 kgs, new ones are lighter like others.
Here's another one MMP atgm development started in 2010, whole tripod+clu+battery weighs 11 kg and ou clu only weighs 14.25kg and mpatgm development started much later.
Drdo was supposed to put contemporary atgm quality product. Infact we started the fnf 3rd gen mpatgm late of all and still got the worst of all.
For uniformed man portable fnf atgm main components are:- (missile including launch tube)+(clu or tas)+(tripod if needed).
MPATGM should be inducted in batches and a new contemporary variant should be developed like that of MMP and spike lr2, lighter, multi target, networked and fire on grid n update capability.
A good first try worth inducting in large numbers unless next variant is made.View attachment 131423
View attachment 131422