Hi thanks for the update really appreciate it.....
But as a follow on question at the moment without these things jutting (MAWS,LWS,DIRCM etc) out of the airframe it is a clean configuration and thus we have all the performance measurement (eg: weight, speed, payload, max altitude, range etc)
Now at a later date when we add all the gizmos wont all the critical parameters mentioned may change and wont it have to go in trials again to prove all the changes ??????
I have no aerodynamics knowledge but just with common sense I do assume that adding all that will hamper its aerodynamics (drag especially) and hence the other parameters. So I assume other rounds of trails will take place and no bulk order will be given anytime soon
So if you see the above pic which is a very early infographic by HAL(around 2015 or maybe early) ,all the systems and weapons were already preplanned and were accounted with permissible ∆weight at design stages itself around the shakti engine. So this resolves your weight issues.
Helicopters often get upgraded with different self protection suites in their lifetime even apache with totally different placements for sensors with hardly any performance penalties as long as there is ample power for them and are placed optimally. So I don't really think there would be a problem regarding aerodynamics, maybe few quick tests. Remember it is not a plane flying supersonic.
I don't really like to talk about specs as no single clear picture is out there. Like ok there is your max payload but at what fuel fraction at what altitude? What is the range for certain weight profile? What is the max altitude achievable at this payload config? Are the stub wings/hardpoints designed to handle such payloads? How are your engines designed to perform in conditions like hot and high altitude conditions? Since there is no graph and no data tables for lch or say any product, debating on specs is total tomfoolery for me!!
LCH has just so much to offer. When HTSE 1200 becomes available you can maybe increase payload or fuel capacity, maybe a little fuselage design change or conformal fuel tanks for that?? You can add FCR radar and its power requirements can be met with increased power of htse 1200?? You can add better sensors or better, indigenous ones. You can add data links for network centricity and add drone control like ah64e, perhaps a drone launched from lch for battle damage assessment and ISR. Add standoff weapons, thanks to targetting data from drone. Make naval lch with foldable blades for future navy lhd ships and marine battalions.
You see a lch which is extreme light weight in it's class with a good engine(htse 1200 power class
) offers performance like bigger attack Helis at reduced cost albeit at reduced level of ballistic protection.
This was on just recent latest official Hal lch brochure. If they don't add quad atgm on inner pylons, I'm gonna be really mad
. And for god's sake also use 19 tube lightweight rocket pod too,atleast inner pylons are capable to do so. Lch can do much more than what it is currently configured to do. It can be more of a medium class attack heli. Light heli imo are like armed versions of Kiowa, aw 109, bo 105.