- Joined
- Jan 14, 2020
- Messages
- 9,609
- Likes
- 84,139
Good news.
Hope this washes away the ghost of Ecuador. Hopefully the deal is for MkIII. BTW, when did we offer Philippines an LoC?Good news.
The details in the public domain stated that the trials on Uttam were to be completed by 2020. Any updates on that?
AFAIK, Uttam is still under trial.The details in the public domain stated that the trials on Uttam were to be completed by 2020. Any updates on that?
Good news.
What is it source for the imageCSL- built DRDO TDV
View attachment 108838
Probably the most advanced Naval Auxiliary vessel in Asia, lol.
from worst possible angle ...whichever publication this is from did it have any other details?CSL- built DRDO TDV
View attachment 108838
Probably the most advanced Naval Auxiliary vessel in Asia, lol.
What's the difference between this and INS Dhruv?CSL- built DRDO TDV
View attachment 108838
Probably the most advanced Naval Auxiliary vessel in Asia, lol.
that one only tracks and maybe guids but this one will be used to test naval radars and maybe missiles as well .U can spot the LRMFR housing on the mid but shamefully cant see the arraysWhat's the difference between this and INS Dhruv?
This will be our test bed for various new gen naval technologies from sonars to radars.What's the difference between this and INS Dhruv?
What is it source for the image
CSL annual report. No other important details.from worst possible angle ...whichever publication this is from did it have any other details?
Compare with what exactly.How did sit compare to china pak @gslv markIII
This is a floating testbed.What's the difference between this and INS Dhruv?
This TDV has two BMD missile launchers in the rear to act as a BMD launcher testbed and a rear looking two panel LMFR to guide the missiles acting as fire control.What's the difference between this and INS Dhruv?
4. ADA/HAL are working on single titanium block milling for AMCA similar to F-35. Midhani annual report states that they delivered test blocks in February. (also posted in AMCA thread)
Interesting says it is 1.2mx1.3m and 12cm thick. They compromised on width and height but retained the thickness. This compromise means they will require more fasteners and more structural material and will have to compromise on internal space which F-35 couldn't on because they had weird requirements.