Митинг в Донецке 6 Ð¸ÑŽÐ»Ñ 2014 - YouTubeIn July, in the same square was about several hundreds.
Here more than a several hundred. But less than happened March. I think it is connected with the siege provision of the Donetsk:
and the fact that many have left Donetsk. Refugees distribute even we, in the Altai Republic(the South of Siberia) and up to the Far East.
Plus a certain factor has played a double game of some leaders of DND. Which has led to the submission of several cities before the meeting and melting of rumors that the Russians agreed with the US on the destruction of DND.
It features the Ukrainian economy. Mines unprofitable until such time as all profits derived abroad. Resources, especially in densely populated region always would come in handy. Plus the 7 million people who are culturally similar, engineers, writers, scientists, yeah just workers - in Siberia the right people. When I worked on an oil rig, we have to half the teams were drawn from Ukraine. if would junta in Kyiv allowed them to hold a referendum and to secede from Ukraine - they would gladly accepted in Russia.This depressed regions. Donbass - economically not need Russia.
Now with the power accession is completely different games. Russia is engaged in the formation of the Eurasian Union. In November 2013, before unrest in the Ukraine, Turkey and Iran have expressed their desire jointo Union. This is a serious geostrategic project, which would unite Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, the Caucasus, Middle Asia, Turkey (+ Syria), Iran, and (had it not been Maidan) Ukraine. The Union of the countries with the consolidated market, manpower and military block. War in which Russia was involved in this situation was completely out of place. Because of this, the Russian leadership to the latest pulled, hoping for a peaceful resolution to the crisis in Ukraine or on its preservation. Unfortunately Kiev junta went on the way of exacerbation. In fairness, the group pseudo-patriots-nationalists from Russia them seriously helped.
We had the unenviable choice of either we intervene and become engaged in a full-scale cold war with the US and Europe, with regional conflicts, across all borders.
Either leave the Pro-Russian movement in Ukraine. Then, following their defeat in Ukraine, threw himself would defeat and Pro-Russian parties in all neighboring countries. In addition, part of the same boat (related to international financial institutions), declaring the Russian leadership in betrayal of national interest, and our problems which accompany hundreds of thousands of refugees from Ukraine would suit the civil war in Russia. It is not fantastic, and the very real sceanrio. A few weeks ago, he began to be implemented when "NETWORK mass media" provides information about Ukrainian crisis 90% of Internet users in Russia and controlled by oligarch Malafeev (and international structures standing on him) began massive injection of misinformation about separate agreement between the U.S. and Russia on destruction of militia of the South-East. At the same time one of the field commanders that are associated with these structures, began without a fight to give the enemy a key sities. That, if not stopped, in the course of a few days would lead to the defeat of the militias and the transfer of the crisis on the territory of Russia.
Sorry for my bad English
Last edited: