What makes you feel that the US and the West are the sole custodians of the Gospel Truth?
The Soros Foundation and/or the United States government supported and even planned the Colour revolutions in order to serve Western geopolitical interests.
After the Orange Revolution several Central Asian nations took action against the Open Society Institute of George Soros with various means – Uzbekistan, for example, forced the shutting down of the OSI regional offices, while Tajikistan's state-controlled media have accused OSI-Tajikistan of corruption and nepotism. People who applauded the colour revolutions did so also
Evidence suggests U.S. government involvement including the USAID (and UNDP) which supported Internet structures called Freenet, which are known to comprise a major part of the Internet structure in at least one of the countries – Kyrgyzstan – in which one of the colour revolutions occurred.
The Guardian, a renowned British newspaper, claimed that USAID, National Endowment for Democracy, the International Republican Institute, the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, and Freedom House are directly involved; the Washington Post and the New York Times also reported substantial Western involvement in some of these events.
Why should the GOI takes sides when all are lying through their teeth.
Completely understand the Indian government's position i.e. neutrality. Am just surprised so many Indians would be so pro Russian, on this forum, in contrast to their own government's position.
Am, somewhat, aware of who Soros is. Would be cautious, however, about linking him too closely with the US government though, particularly the current administration. Although, you're not claiming Western involvment in the Ukraine is limited to governments.
Basically, am entirely in agreeance with Asianobserve vis-a-vis the points you raised. So, quoting him can serve as my reply to you.
Yes, point is every country is free to try to influence other countries, that's what international relations are for. But the object country must decide for itself what it wants. Russia should not annex part of its territory, use intimidation or force, and dismember Ukraine just because it wants closer relations with EU. It must respect Ukraine's decision since as an independent country Ukraine is free to exercise its sovereignty or decide whom it wants to have closer ties with.
I don't have to tell you that Russian forces (with patches removed) annexed Crimea, then all these alleged Prime Minister in Ukraine rebel held areas are former Russian intelligence operatives (it even seems that a lot of the so called rebels there are Russians from Russian provinces), now weapons, tanks and it appears SAMs are flowing from Russia into rebel areas. Is EU doing it?
I am not sitting in judgement.
All I am saying that folks like
@apple and
@asianobserve need to realise the issue in depth before postulating that the US and the West are as clean as a whistle or purer than the snow of Mount Etna.
The US, West and Russia are all nude in the Turkish bath and are equally complicit.
Once again, Asianobserve's response can serve as my reply.
It is Ukraine determining its own course. Russia on the other hand directly invaded (annexed) part of Ukraine and is currently invading by proxy another part. Is the EU doing this?
I most certainly dont agree that the West and Russia are equally complicit in the atrocities taking place. Although, in Russia's defence, they are invested far more deeply involved into the situation. So, it's impossible for them to be as pure as snow.
Think the best we can do is to agree to disagree, as cannot see either of us changing the other's mind.
The point I am trying to make is the all member states in European Union are sovereign at this moment. The most important body of EU is the European Council:
European Council - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The European Council members are neither elected nor appointed but comprise
delegates of the governments of their constituents.
The whole Ukraine mess has to be about individual countries and not about "European Union". The European Union is being led by a "certain country" and "related countries". It is not THE European Union.
Miscalculation might also be a word slowly cropping up but the "mess" done in Ukraine might have achieved what was wanted as of now.
Think the entirity of your post, which I edited (sorry about that but my own post is getting very long), should be required reading for anyone posting here about the EU and NATO. There has been some really strange misconceptions about those subjects here.
Presume by "certain country" you mean the UK and "related countries" you, mainly, mean the US. Would disagree that the EU can be effectively led, so I don't agree with some of what you've written.
But, from my understanding of your main point, I totally agree that the Council of Europe is the relevant EU organisation for foreign policy, and the EU is not NATO.
AND there is nothing that the West and EU can do to Russia via sanctions that they haven't done already. AND it is the West and the EU who are going to be the real people at the receiving end. AND Malaysia had to suffer twice by loosing two of it's planes due to actions by the US !!! Digest this.
^^^^^^^^^^^Quoted for truth^^^^^^^^
Only Putin bottom lickers will believe Russian version of events. Here's a more believable version of events:
No Cookies | Herald Sun
In a way the frantic denial from Putin is understandable and expected as this is a very serious murder by stupidity and one that will have huge diplomatic implications against them. They will try to muddle first the issue, as what it is doing now, with outlandish conspiracy theories: Ukrainians shot MH-19 down thinking it was Putin's plane; Ukrainains shot it down to pin the blame on Russia; not to mention some flat-out stupid theories like from the rebels that this whole scenario is a conspiracy by the West to put Russia and the rebels in a bad light by putting dead bodies from MH-370 to MH-17 and then shooting down the plane (the B777 must have been turned into a drone just for that idiotic exercise). The purpose of muddling the issue now is to divide the international community for enough time to stop the momentum of a concerted and more severe Western punitive actions against Russia that so far until now the EU is hesitant to impose. Eventually, when everybody is already tired of hearing charges and counter-charges some in the rebels (not Russia) will admit culpability by stupidity.
I hope Putin does not succeed against this time. We owe it to the 298 innocent people that were mudered in flight MH-17 to expose how they were murdered and to prosecute those who murdered them and those who facilitated the murder.
I agree with the article, which is succinctly written. But, you probably don't want to be quoting the Herald Sun. I am not sure if they still do, but they used to have daily photos of topless girls on page 3 of their paper. If it's not the actual worse paper in Australia, for international news, it would be very close to the bottom.
Many of western media spreading this foto claming that the man steals a ring.
Western journalists probably got the first foto from ukranian sources. Do not believe ukranian media, they are laying all the way about rebel fighters.
The man on the foto isn't
stealing. He is
collecting things - watch it yourself:
Six of one, a half dozen of another. Stay classy, Bhramos.
In order to bright a light defusion into the situation in our minds
How is making jokes about the innocent victims of a tragedy tolerated on this forum?
The orange revolution in Ukraine- it was the failure of the United States.
I'm with
@Ray on this one, in that the present situation in the Ukraine can be considered a continuation of the orange revolution.
While, I'm not sure what McCain, etc... were up to recently in Kiev, it would be fair to say McCain isn't a fan of Russia.
Although, if he, or any others, came up with any plans, pretty sure they wouldn't have been this.
Ironically, or not depending on your point of view, it's not McCain and the Hawks who have been left holding the can. It's Obama that's been left looking like an idiot.
Am somewhat surprised that none of this thread's more cynical conspiracy thoerists haven't mentioned it, but am sure there are members of the American Republican party who are quite pleased with the way things have developed in the Ukraine.