China Economy: News & Discussion

[SexyChineseLady]

US big-brother relationship

 

[srevster]

Just to inform you four 130T YF-100K LOX/Kerosene engines hot fire test today
View attachment 250571
View attachment 250572

Indian space tech company successfully test-fires world's first single-piece 3D-rocket engine

The test has now validated the startup's patented design and manufacturing methodology.

interestingengineering.com

 

[Azaad]

Yes but that still doesn't answer my original question as to whether the SUV comes free with the drone or vice versa. All I see is your usual infomeme about the compatibility between the drone & the SUV.

 

[srevster]

2% growth on a 20T economy is 400B market expansion per year. Because of your decreasing population and growth rates China will be lucky to sustain 400-500B growth per year.

india on the other hand is estimated to expand by $500B by the year 2028.

this means that India will contribute more to growth than China in 2028. Not sure what is confusing about this.

 

[srevster]

 

[srevster]

2030 is 3% and 2040 is 2% growth. I would argue it will be even lower because of your population problem

 

[srevster]

India will eclipse China in 2028 as far as growth is concerned

 

[smooth manifold]

PM Modi explains how India will become $5 trillion economy in 5 years
India Today Web Desk
New Delhi,UPDATED: Jul 6, 2019 16:10 IST

A day after Union Minister Nirmala Sitharaman presented Budget 2019, PM Narendra Modi painted a picture of how India will become $5 trillion economy.

PM Modi explains how India will become $5 trillion economy in 5 years

PM Modi stitched every topic of the budget with how India will attain 5 trillion economy. "Everyone is a stakeholder in this country," PM Narendra Modi said while addressing the BJP workers in Varanasi.

www.indiatoday.in

It's 2024 now. hehe.

 

[rockdog]

Lol Tesla is not even allowed to collect map data let alone do full self driving. Stop the bullshit, Tesla doesn’t have a mapping license in China.

He is right!

It's on today, all the data stored inside China.








PM Li Qiang helped Musk built Tesla Giga Factory from 0 to massive production in 11 months when he was head of Shnghai, it saved Musk from biggest crisis 5 yrs ago.

 

[srevster]

He is right!

It's on today, all the data stored inside China.








PM Li Qiang helped Musk built Tesla Giga Factory from 0 to massive production in 11 months when he was head of Shnghai, it saved Musk from biggest crisis 5 yrs ago.

By law Tesla is not allowed to collect and store data. It doesn’t have a license. Only a licensed map provider may make the maps and license it to Tesla. FSD is a non starter in China unless Tesla is given a license to collect and store data.

if it was as simple as data localization, many western firms would be actively mapping China. However that’s not the case.

you aren’t being intellectually honest with these claims and you know it

 

[MiG-29SMT]

View attachment 250561
View attachment 250563

US big-brother relationship
View attachment 250564

Why fake research is rampant in China

2 min read 24 Apr 2024, 06:45 PM IST

Why fake research is rampant in China

Eleven students aim to set a better example

www.livemint.com

 

[MiG-29SMT]

New satellite image shows Chinese launch startup Land Space is expanding its launch complex

Why fake research is rampant in China

Eleven students aim to set a better example

www.livemint.com

 

[MiG-29SMT]

Many of the fishy papers are probably written, for a fee, by “paper mills". These outfits often plagiarise real research, changing a few details. Some fakes are obvious, says Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist who specialises in rooting them out. She found a Chinese paper on prostate cancer, for instance, which claimed that more than half of the patients studied were women. Only men have prostate glands. Other fakes look more convincing and might pollute a field of research. So some scientists simply refuse to peer review work from China, says Ms Bik.

Why fake research is rampant in China

Eleven students aim to set a better example

www.livemint.com

In China women can have prostrate cancer

 

[SexyChineseLady]

 

[MiG-29SMT]

New satellite image shows Chinese launch startup Land Space is expanding its launch complex

space program does not allow manufacturing since all is made on earth

But Moron thinks some how space technology allows GDP growth.

Manufacturing is made on earth for obvious reasons

obviously astronuats do not manufacture in space since just by numbers is impossible.

According to some estimates, producing a car uses an astonishing 40,000 gallons of water.
https://www.dupont.com/knowledge/wa...producing,astonishing 40,000 gallons of water.


obvoiusly by water availability in space station water is not available for manufacture even of a single car

for agriculture well it is not possible

obviously astronuats can not feed them selves they need earth resources

 

[MiG-29SMT]

Many of the fishy papers are probably written, for a fee, by “paper mills". These outfits often plagiarise real research, changing a few details. Some fakes are obvious, says Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist who specialises in rooting them out. She found a Chinese paper on prostate cancer, for instance, which claimed that more than half of the patients studied were women. Only men have prostate glands. Other fakes look more convincing and might pollute a field of research. So some scientists simply refuse to peer review work from China, says Ms Bik



Only in China women have prostrate cancer

“Unauthorized copying of our equipment abroad is a huge problem. There have been 500 such cases over the past 17 years. China alone has copied aircraft engines, Sukhoi planes, deck jets, air defense systems, portable air defense missiles, and analogues of the Pantsir medium-range surface-to-air systems,” said Yevgeny Livadny, Rostec’s chief of intellectual property projects.

Livadny appeared to be referring, among other things, to alleged Chinese intellectual property theft after Russia’s 2015 sale to China of six S-400 anti-aircraft systems and 24 Su-35 fighter jets for $5 billion.

China is also thought to have benefitted from Russian technology when, in 2017, it rolled out its fifth generation Chengdu J-20 fighter, which is believed to be technologically superior to Russia’s SU-57E.

China is further suspected of having based its J-11 fighter jet and HQ-9 surface-to-air missiles on Russia’s Su-27 fighter jets and S-300 missile systems, which were purchased in the 1990s.

Chinese technology theft is unlikely to persuade Russia to forego the strategic advantages of its geopolitical cooperation with China any time soon. But with China’s defense industry significantly improving its technological capabilities, Russia needs to ensure that it remains crucial to the People’s Republic’s military development—not only for economic reasons but also to maintain a balance in an alliance that is based on pursuing short-term common interests while kicking potential friction points down the road.

When it comes to arms, Russia is pressuring China to engage in joint weapons development while seeking to maintain a technological edge.

Russia recently sought to press its technological advantage by announcing that its new Avangard hypersonic intercontinental glide vehicle, which can fly 27 times the speed of sound, has become operational.

Positioning Russia as the first country to have hypersonic weapons, the Avangard is launched atop an intercontinental ballistic missile. But unlike a regular missile warhead that follows a predictable path after separation, it can make sharp maneuvers in the atmosphere en route to its target, making it much harder to intercept.

In geopolitical terms, the Avangard may give Russia a first-starter advantage, but it is at best just another band-aid to work around the fragility of not only the Russian-Chinese alliance but also the alliances with Turkey and Iran.

The fragility of those alliances is evident in Turkish and Russian
“Unauthorized copying of our equipment abroad is a huge problem. There have been 500 such cases over the past 17 years. China alone has copied aircraft engines, Sukhoi planes, deck jets, air defense systems, portable air defense missiles, and analogues of the Pantsir medium-range surface-to-air systems,” said Yevgeny Livadny, Rostec’s chief of intellectual property projects.

Livadny appeared to be referring, among other things, to alleged Chinese intellectual property theft after Russia’s 2015 sale to China of six S-400 anti-aircraft systems and 24 Su-35 fighter jets for $5 billion.

China is also thought to have benefitted from Russian technology when, in 2017, it rolled out its fifth generation Chengdu J-20 fighter, which is believed to be technologically superior to Russia’s SU-57E.

A Fragile Anti-US Alliance: Russia Accuses China of Technology Theft

The relationship between Russia and China is based on shared short-term strategic interests, but their differences lie just beneath the surface. Occasionally they erupt into the public eye, as occurre

besacenter.org

But it is useful to look at retractions, or when a scientific journal withdraws a study, usually due to suspicions of research misconduct. Papers from China have the fourth-highest retraction rate in the world, according to Nature, a journal (see chart). In a database of some 50,000 retracted studies compiled by Crossref, an American non-profit, and Retraction Watch, a blog, about 46% are from China.
https://www.livemint.com/education/...IExvFPffr8QBLum16AXlyyaZM5E2M5cuIVQbtBDyfodDw

 

[rockdog]

FSD is comimg!

 

[srevster]

FSD is comimg!

All conjecture until China modifies its geospatial laws to allow foreigners to handle geospatial data. If the law is changed a flood of companies will map China overnight. But knowing the CCP tendency to shoot itself in the foot, I doubt this will happen.

what’s likely to happen instead is Tesla will be forced to work with Tencent, Alibaba, NavInfo, SAIC or BAIc. Tesla’s infrastructure and training pipeline will be stolen and FSD will be reverse engineered. Elon would be a dumbass to accept this offer.

 

[srevster]

The rules, effective since publication, could further complicate the local operations of foreign companies like Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab, which already have to seek partnerships with Chinese firms when it comes to collecting and processing such data.

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/china-says-automakers-must-have-licences-mapping-data-smart-cars-2022-09-01/#:~:text=China%20has%20so%20far%20issued,SZ)%20%2C%20opens%20new%20tab

.

 

[srevster]

The Godfather of Foreign Relations