Then Nirbhay test too coming up? For 700 km NOTAM?
....................................................................................
Or is it A1 again this time?
Then Nirbhay test too coming up? For 700 km NOTAM?
....................................................................................
The test for 700km is from Navy Ship ..... so A1 and Nirbhay can be ruled out .Then Nirbhay test too coming up? For 700 km NOTAM?
Or is it A1 again this time?
Well i was thinking the same some thingh does not add-up..Or I am thinking too much.
It's not uncommon for DRDO folks to throw out an ambitious completion date even before all aspects of the project are understood. Most delays are attributed to "technological challenges"!!And things are really very hush and hush with Brahmos-2 . A model of the missile was displayed for the first time at Defexpo 2012. This displayed model has remained same all throughout these years and the fleet xact same model was displayed at this year's Defexpo. This proves that this may be the actual design of Brahmos-2K.
Now you don't suddenly come up with a model of a hypersonic missile with a 300-600 km range and a max speed of M7. Lots of feasibility studies, then airframe design studies, wind tunnel tests, etc goes into it. This means the Brahmos-2 program must have started at least a year before that is in 2011.
At Defexpo 2012, Brahmos officials and the CEO had said it will take another 6-7 years to develope hypersonic variant Now at Defexpo 2018, Dr Sudhir Mishra had said the missile will come in another 10 years.
Something just doesn't add up.
Its ok.... But why the typical flight path? Its quiet abnormal I would say.The test for 700km is from Navy Ship ..... so A1 and Nirbhay can be ruled out .
Most probably it will be an extended range B'mos test from Ship , JMHO .
Hyperonic vehicles will consume fuel insanely. The drag will be so high that the mileage will be extremely low. I am not sure if the hypersonic missile is even a viable option for any country, forget just India. People may test some glide vehicles, but a missile travelling at hypersonic speed within earth's atmosphere (unlike Ballistic missiles which do so outside atmosphere) is a quite difficult.It's not uncommon for DRDO folks to throw out an ambitious completion date even before all aspects of the project are understood. Most delays are attributed to "technological challenges"!!
Most important thing to remember is that the they normally quote the expected duration of the project; even when the full project may not have been sanctioned. Astra-Mk2 was being quoted as being ready in 2 years for nearly 10 years - the project hasn't even started as yet!!!
American, Russian and Chinese don't think so. Each of them have multiple projects on hypersonic weapons, from cruise missiles equipped with scramjet engine to hypro powered plane.I am not sure if the hypersonic missile is even a viable option for any country, forget just India.
While I agree that in India's case a longer range (800 kms) Brahmos maybe more useful in the short/medium term, it is also inevitable that air defense systems will mature to intercept supersonic cruise missiles like Brahmos easily. As such hypersonic cruise missiles (despite paying the drag cost) maybe a necessity in the future.Hyperonic vehicles will consume fuel insanely. The drag will be so high that the mileage will be extremely low. I am not sure if the hypersonic missile is even a viable option for any country, forget just India. People may test some glide vehicles, but a missile travelling at hypersonic speed within earth's atmosphere (unlike Ballistic missiles which do so outside atmosphere) is a quite difficult.
800kms range, that means you can say good buy to all weather Mach 3-2.5 speed.While I agree that in India's case a longer range (800 kms) Brahmos maybe more useful in the short/medium term, it is also inevitable that air defense systems will mature to intercept supersonic cruise missiles like Brahmos easily. As such hypersonic cruise missiles (despite paying the drag cost) maybe a necessity in the future.
Hypersonic flights for vehicles, yeah everyone seem to be working on it, the question arises on which fuel those Scramjet work, US, IND, RUSSIA use Hydrocarbon fuel as well as hydrogen fuel, that's one advancement. Hypersonic missiles and at which stage it is hypersonic is more important.American, Russian and Chinese don't think so. Each of them have multiple projects on hypersonic weapons, from cruise missiles equipped with scramjet engine to hypro powered plane.
On the contrary, they're talking about increasing both the speed & the range simultaneously!!800kms range, that means you can say good buy to all weather Mach 3-2.5 speed.
Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk
Maintain the same Mach 3 speed for 800kms is impossible and if it's, then might need a barage of fuel tank along with it.On the contrary, they're talking about increasing both the speed & the range simultaneously!!
Obviously advances have been made in the fuel composition since the last few decades when Brahmos missile was originally developed!
When Brahmos/Yakhont/Onik family of missiles are already designed to fly at Mach 2.5-3 to a distance of 600kms, then I don't see a range extension of 30% to be that big of a deal!!!Maintain the same Mach 3 speed for 800kms is impossible and if it's, then might need a barage of fuel tank along with it.
Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk
Diff bw design to fly and actually flying, yeah that can be possible, need to fly at higher altitude than the specified, BrahMos need to cruise at higher altitude, thus exposing to modern Radar and IR devices.When Brahmos/Yakhont/Onik family of missiles are already designed to fly at Mach 2.5-3 to a distance of 600kms, then I don't see a range extension of 30% to be that big of a deal!!!
So you mean they were designed to fly that distance but FAILED to do so?? Sounds like some weird speculation!!!Diff bw design to fly and actually flying, yeah that can be possible, need to fly at higher altitude than the specified, BrahMos need to cruise at higher altitude, thus exposing to modern Radar and IR devices.
Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk
For avoiding radars in needed to fly at altitudes which avoid coming the missile in the aperture of the radar which makes impossible to fly 800kms. And at higher altitude ie above than the current 14km cruise altitude, which exposes the missile to IR detectors. BrahMos can't hide neither can sustain Mach 3 if the ranges are extended too 800kms.So you mean they were designed to fly that distance but FAILED to do so?? Sounds like some weird speculation!!!
Sure, it'll fly it's initial and mid-course at higher altitudes. No missile/aircraft can fly the nap of the earth at Mach 3 anyways !!!
Brahmos flies low only in the terminal mode (lower in sea skimming mode).
Ground radars won't be able to detect distant objects easily. Brahmos (800kms range) can easily fly high altitude in its initial part undetected; then it can progressively keep lowering its altitude (still flying 1000s of meters above) to remain in the blind spot of the ground radar for a major part its travel!
Cannot understand what you're saying!!!For avoiding radars in needed to fly at altitudes which avoid coming the missile in the aperture of the radar which makes impossible to fly 800kms.
What is the basis of your claim that Brahmos won't be able to maintain Mach 3 for extended range??And at higher altitude ie above than the current 14km cruise altitude, which exposes the missile to IR detectors. BrahMos can't hide neither can sustain Mach 3 if the ranges are extended too 800kms.
Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk
800km is a bit of a stretch. Even if Brahmos flies high, the height will not be higher than 1km to get rid of air resistance. Composites only work for the casing and not things like motor, booster etc as they require special metal capable of withstanding high heat. Also, the density difference between composite and Aluminum is 1.8g/cm3 vs 2.7g/cm3 - 33% reducton. considering that the casing is not too heavy, the reduction will be minimal.Cannot understand what you're saying!!!
What is the basis of your claim that Brahmos won't be able to maintain Mach 3 for extended range??
What do you think the scientists will be doing for the next couple of years? If not re-designing and optimizing parts of the missile!
To suggest that even 30% improvement cannot be attained after 30 years of breakthroughs/improvements in science & engineering ( since Brahmos original propulsion was designed) is quite unreasonable!!
Did you even know that the Brahmos is being redesigned to have a composite casing???