Arjun Main Battle Tank (MBT)

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
No Kunal, finas are not to cause a spin, but to stabilize projectile during flight.
During flight of the projectile it have to spin to stabilize it self, for that fins are there..

That is the physics for any aimed projectile..
 

Damian

New Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2011
Messages
4,836
Likes
2,202
No, no, did any of You ever seen a slow motion video of a flying APFSDS penetrator? Fired from a smoothbore gun such penetrator barely spin, if it is spin anyway.

Search for such videos.

APFSDS round generally do not spin, but APDS rounds do spin because they do not have fins and are fired from rifled guns only, while APFSDS rounds might be fired by rifled and smoothbore guns. But as smoothbore gun do not have rifling, it does not cause spin effect on the round.

BTW HEAT rounds fired from smoothbore guns are also fin stabilized, and are not spining. So fins are not causing spin, if so, it would reduce effectiveness of HEAT rounds fired from smoothbore guns by causing spin effect that is not like by shaped charge warheads.
 

LurkerBaba

New Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2010
Messages
7,883
Likes
8,138
Country flag
During flight of the projectile it have to spin to stabilize it self, for that fins are there..

That is the physics for any aimed projectile..
It's a bit more complex. A projectile with Fins does not spin, it uses the viscous property of air to stabilize itself. A Spinning projectile OTOH uses angular momentum

See this:


Aerodynamic Drag Stabilization vs Gyroscopic Stabilization






SPIN-STABILIZED PROJECTILES Most guns in use today use spin-stabilized projectiles. Spinning a projectile promotes flight stability. Spinning is obtained by firing the projectiles through a rifled tube. The projectile engages the rifling by means of a rotating band normally made of copper. The rotating band is engaged by the lands and grooves. At a nominal muzzle velocity of 2800 feet per second, spin rates on the order of 250 revolutions per second are encountered. Spin-stabilized projectiles are full bore (flush with the bore walls) and are limited approximately to a 5:1 length-to-diameter ratio. They perform very well at relatively low trajectories (less than 45� quadrant elevation). In high trajectory applications they tend to overstabilize (maintain the angle at which they were fired) and, therefore, do not follow the trajectory satisfactorily.


FIN-STABILIZED PROJECTILES These projectiles obtain stability through the use of fins located at the aft end of the projectile. Normally, four to six fins are employed. Additional stability is obtained by imparting some spin (approximately 20 revolutions/second) to the projectile by canting the leading edge of the fins. Fin-stabilized projectiles are very often subcaliber. A sabot, wood or metal fitted around the projectile, is used to center the projectile in the bore and provide a gas seal. Such projectiles vary from 10:1 to 15:1 in length-to-diameter ratio. Fin-stabilized projectiles are advantageous because they follow the trajectory very well at high-launch angles, and they can be designed with very low drag thereby increasing range and/or terminal velocity. However, fin-stabilized projectiles are disadvantageous because the extra length of the projectile must be accommodated and the payload volume is comparatively low in relation to the projectile length.

In contrast to conventional spin-stabilized projectiles which derive their in-flight stability from the gyroscopic forces resulting from the high rate of spin, the finned projectiles are stabilized during flight by aerodynamic forces acting on the projectile.


Although projectile spin does not contribute to the stabilization of finned projectiles, a low rate of roll around the longitudinal axis is desired to minimize the adverse effects of mass and configurational asymmetries which may result from material imperfections and from manufacturing tolerances.
Large Caliber Ammunition - Types of Projectiles
 

Scalieback

New Member
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
1,092
Likes
249
In Punjab area, Engg & there Bridges decides the mobility of the army, though BMP & T-90/72, Arjun can do without one..
It doesn't seem to have a flotation screen so I assume it has a snorkel if you're saying it doesn't need to bother about bridges?
 

Scalieback

New Member
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
1,092
Likes
249
BMP-2 swims, Arjun & Other tanks use Snorkel..
I assume then that it's a seperate bit of kit and requires installation as it's not carried like Sov/Russ tanks. How deep?

What does India use as bridging units? Anything like the M3?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bhadra

New Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,756
Country flag
During flight of the projectile it have to spin to stabilize it self, for that fins are there..

That is the physics for any aimed projectile..
Is it applicable to artillery projectiles and mortars bombs to ? How does a moratr bomb spin?
 

sayareakd

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,953
Country flag
one more thing about BFSR, it will be easy to hit, tanks and helicopter with LAHAT/CLGM including tracking of targets. New BFSR has double the range.
 

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
I assume then that it's a seperate bit of kit and requires installation as it's not carried like Sov/Russ tanks. How deep?

What does India use as bridging units? Anything like the M3?
This Video is about Indian Army Corps of Engineers ( 10 min ) will give you deep insight..

Its in English..




Is it applicable to artillery projectiles and mortars bombs to ? How does a moratr bomb spin?
Mortar bombs have stabilizer fins at back, Arty shells spins as barrel is rifled..

Mortar barrel are rifled also smooth-bore..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Kunal Biswas

Member of the Year 2011
New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
31,122
Likes
41,041
Re: Arjun Mk-II Gets Ready To Compete Russian T-90 Tank

Yes that is Arjun MK-2 Prototype Image..
 

Shaitan

Zandu Balm all day
New Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2010
Messages
4,654
Likes
8,370
Country flag
Ok, I'm about to post Sengupta stuff...


This is one of two Arjun Mk1A MBT prototypes that are presently being subjected to mobility-cum-firepower trials. This photo, which appears in a four-page DRDO corporate advertisement published in the latest issue of THE WEEK magazine, was taken at the CVRDE's proving ground at Avadi earlier this year. The second Arjun Mk1A prototype comes outfitted with the new digital hunter-killer tank fire-control system, inclusive of a target auto-tracker and a newly-designed commander's panoramic day/night sight that incorporates an IRIS thermal imager (from France's SAGEM Défense Sécurité) and an eyesafe laser rangefinder. These optronic sensors are the same as that installed on the IRDE-developed commander's panoramic day/night sight which is presently undergoing user-trials on board an upgraded T-90S MBT.
TRISHUL


So if he's right. This isn't the picture of the mark 2 in trials.

And there isn't any pictures of the real deal yet.

I kind of believe it, because I'm not sure Thar has that type of red sticky soil.
 
Last edited:

Articles

Top