black eagle
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2009
- Messages
- 1,237
- Likes
- 134
I don't think so...Is there a possibility that Arjun could ever be exported to Iran?
I don't think so...Is there a possibility that Arjun could ever be exported to Iran?
Why Iran ?Is there a possibility that Arjun could ever be exported to Iran?
Ask An Expert- LAND Forces.Recent trends have seen tanks getting heavier. Armor protection is actually outpacing anti-armor technology in most cases (for the present). However new technologies and new threats coming on line make the previous emphasis on massive frontal protection a thing of the past. Now future tanks need to be able to defend on on all sides including the top and control all emissions (RF, IR, Noise etc), retain not just ground but strategic mobility and preserve cost effectiveness.
Making a tank able to physically withstand all angle attacks would make it a bunker not a tank so technology is likely going to reduce the need for armor making a tank lighter in a base form but scaling up in weight as the threat intensifies. In an environment where the main threat is missiles- add an active defensive system and some form of ERA. If the threat is gun fire- add modular armor blocks etc. Technology will also provide the answers for the other threats the tank faces.
The real problem facing future tanks in the medium to long term is how to get enough firepower to the battlefield to remain relevant, mobile and useful given a high intensity threat situation. The US has bet on smart stand off weapons like the MRM-CE while Germany and Russia have been exploring larger weapons.
For a nation like India or Pakistan bigger remains better, but for nations with an expiditionary outlook lighter might be better.
to cross water obstacles so that water does not enter its exhaust.Exhaust is modified. Wonder why put 'L' shaped tube?
Nice pic.......
That is a wrong theory, With today's FCS you can pin on foot ball at 3kms away and can successfully hit too..i saw a report on tv regarding arjun, t-72 and t-90. arjun was biggest and bulkiest among all. though the army men handling it were proud of it but i somehow understood why army was reluctant in taking up this beast. cuz of its size army is getting away from it. its difficult to hide it in battle field. i hope arjun mk2 is sleaker than what arjun mk1 is...
First of all Arjun and T 90S both have almost the same height at hull down position,so there goes your theory.Being bigger and heavier,the Arjun has much thicker armor and hence greater all round protection.Besides the ARDE along with the Barakuda camouflage has developed a special paint and Multyspectral Mobile Camouflage System that reduces its both visual as well as infrared signature to a great extent.In the field test the MCS denied the visibility to the spotters at 1400 meter.So,in a battle Arjun Mk1 can remain hidden for longer than T 90S.i saw a report on tv regarding arjun, t-72 and t-90. arjun was biggest and bulkiest among all. though the army men handling it were proud of it but i somehow understood why army was reluctant in taking up this beast. cuz of its size army is getting away from it. its difficult to hide it in battle field. i hope arjun mk2 is sleaker than what arjun mk1 is...
First of all Arjun and T 90S both have almost the same height at hull down position,so there goes your theory.Being bigger and heavier,the Arjun has much thicker armor and hence greater all round protection.Besides the ARDE along with the Barakuda camouflage has developed a special paint and Multyspectral Mobile Camouflage System that reduces its both visual as well as infrared signature to a great extent.In the field test the MCS denied the visibility to the spotters at 1400 meter.So,in a battle Arjun Mk1 can remain hidden for longer than T 90S.i saw a report on tv regarding arjun, t-72 and t-90. arjun was biggest and bulkiest among all. though the army men handling it were proud of it but i somehow understood why army was reluctant in taking up this beast. cuz of its size army is getting away from it. its difficult to hide it in battle field. i hope arjun mk2 is sleaker than what arjun mk1 is...
i found this pic, this will tell the whole story
Shot at 2011-08-21
Bang on target Sir.In this picture it's clearly visible that the turret ring of T 90 is completely exposed and if that portion gets hit by an anti tank round(which is very much possible THANX to the shot trap created by the 'unique' placement of the Kontact V ERA tiles)it will result into a catastroph and the crew will die for sure.In case of Arjun,even if the tank is hit the crew inside will escape alive to fight another battle.That is a comparison between M1A2 & T-90S..
Arjunmk1 = 2.32 metres (7 ft 7 in)
T-90S = 2.22 m (7 ft 3 in)
M1A2 = 8 ft (2.44 m )
leopard A4/5/6/7 = 3.0 m (120 in)
I think its too costly, Any idea about the cost of Merkava and Abrams ?Estimation of cost for MK2, seems way more advanced
MBT Arjun Mark-II to cost approximately Rs 37 crore - Indian Defence
It looks more costly than Abrams and Merkava. They need to cut costs i guess.I think its too costly, Any idea about the cost of Merkava and Abrams ?
More indigenous systems will bring down the cost.It looks more costly than Abrams and Merkava. They need to cut costs i guess.
I guess they are working on the engine which will be indigenous.More indigenous systems will bring down the cost.