i did. 600+600+300+760 = 2260.I asked you to mark the dimensions in number
Write the how many mm occupied by each of your colored blocks in your own words.
i did. 600+600+300+760 = 2260.I asked you to mark the dimensions in number
Write the how many mm occupied by each of your colored blocks in your own words.
O.K then,i did. 600+600+300+760 = 2260.
Since you failed to notice, that exact drawing is already part of my picture above, and the dimensions have already been marked.O.K then,
mark all the same four dimensions on the drawing below,and lets see where they start and and where they end,
Then only we can check the correctness of your dimensions against mine because I also used the same line drawing to get my dimensions.
Since you are claiming from the star that you used the same line drawing for your side view, it should not be very difficult to do it.
Extend the turret tip blue line and YOUR 250 cm blue line till they reach the scale.Since you failed to notice, that exact drawing is already part of my picture above, and the dimensions have already been marked.
it's at the bottom with all of those lines you put in.
i did. 600+600+300+760 = 2260.
i did. 600+600+300+760 = 2260.
The above is the picture of the main sight optics,
I posted it just to get the idea of where the main sight optic on the top and where the eye piece is,
It's the German EMES-15, NOT USED in the Arjun.
Because, like every time you try to make a point, you simply ignore dozens of things. Saying "i have studied something somewhere but ain't gonna prove it" is all you do for arguing. Mentioning that the sight is not that of the Arjun's is something you don't do (because you did not know that it was the EMES-15).Why you are you so upset about that,
If you have the pic of the optics for Arjun's main sight please post.
if you have an source that this is the main sight optics of the Arjun please post.Because, like every time you try to make a point, you simply ignore dozens of things. Saying "i have studied something somewhere but ain't gonna prove it" is all you do for arguing. Mentioning that the sight is not that of the Arjun's is something you don't do (because you did not know that it was the EMES-15).
If you had payed ANY attention to this whole debate which already is running since a few MONTHS, you would have noticed that the Arjun does not look like the Leopard 2. The designs are not similar, the layout is not similar, so why the hell should the main sight of the Arjun look like that of the Leopard 2?
15th trophy for me. Ershaktivel doesn't know what the Arjun optic looks likeI posted it just to get the idea of where the main sight optic on the top and where the eye piece is,
Why you are you so upset about that,
If you have the pic of the optics for Arjun's main sight please post.
Just look at the first 5 pictures...By the way where is the eye piece?
Looking at the five pictures , What I am suposed to know,Just look at the first 5 pictures...
since you've failed to notice, the arjun hatch is not circular.We all accept that below is the photo of the Arjun turret,
To the bare eye the distance between the back wall of main sight cutaway and the start of the vision block
is almost equal to the
crew entry hole for TC or the vertical standing hatch cover width
SO it must be 500mm plus at bare minimum,
How come you got 300 mm measurement?
If your 300 mm measurement is true then the Tc must saw both his hands off before entering the tank.
The below is the original drawing , observe the position of the pivot base for the hatch cover,
compare it to the position of the pivot base in your drawing above,
Do you notice anything different?
You have intentionally placed them well behind their original position to suit your fancy 300 mm LOS behind main sight needs.
Look at the picture below of Arjun firing away,
Now do you know where those pivot base for the hatch cover is and how it operates?
since you've failed to notice, the arjun hatch is not circular.
yes i know where the pivot bases are, they are where i put them in the model.
and as i've told you over the past 100 or so pages, of facepalming until my forehead bleeds, the back of the TCs chair is located under the pivot of the TC hatch, not the back of the cupola ring. thats why i'm not using the "full length" as you put it.
and i'm not adding the extra cm of the gunshield, because after all, we're measuring the armour thickness of the turret.
Maybe you should look at the location of the eye-piece, because that was what you asked for...Looking at the five pictures , What I am suposed to know,
I know you are faking it from the start,
That pic was posted by miltrysta , so that I took it to be the main sight optics,@ersakthivel, I hate to say this, but you should have specified that the eye piece is not from Arjun. If you are going to use the article 'the' to qualify the following noun, takin in context, it appears as if you are talking about Arjun. No harm admitting your error.
First you make a single convincing post backed with drawing evidence to prove your fancy 300 mm LOS claim,Maybe you should look at the location of the eye-piece, because that was what you asked for...
Says the guy who thought that 10.638 m is the hull length of the not of the total length of the tank - then uses this value to come up with an insanely huge turret, just to (after being told that the hull length is less than 10.638 m) making up some different "measurement" to come up with the same insane value.
Then you took the hatch diameter, told people it would be insanely large just to again come up with "values" for an insanely huge turret,First of all unlike many of the trolls who purposefully give a false representation of info regarding Arjun,
while claiming to be tank experts,
I am no tank expert ,
and I never said so
But I know what is the purpose of machine design, So knew most of your claims of leaving a weak area behind main sight is not exactly true,
Why?
When a team of scientists design a tank nothing is left to chance, that too under the ever raising requirement creep by IA.
So what is the purpose of the bunch of guys who without even seeing the tank pretended to know everything about Arjun?
I still don't know!!!!!!
People who haven't designed a simple lawn mower in life deriding technical persons who spent most of their life designing this tank!!!!!!!!!
ofcourse I thought that 10.63 does not include the gun , But when Pmaitra posted the picture did I repeatedly counter him saying he is false?
I accepted and used his scales and drawing through out the thread for calculation,
But I don't remember you using that line drawing even once to make any post,
On the contrary you made a stupid claim that turret height of Arjun is more or less same as that of LEO months after seeing the drawing!!!!!!!!!
I thought the crew hole would be large to facilitate easy exit in emergency as a common sense measure,
But once a respected member told me it is somewhere between 450 mm and 500 mm ,
I accepted it even before using the face width calculation to check it .
So what is your problem with that?
but after being told that the hatch is not being as large as suggested by you, you again manipulate numbers to come up with an insanely huge turret.
Every single of your posts has been nothing than randomly pulling up numbers completely out of your mind and "bending" them to match your imagination. You said that a human face would be a feet wide, after I posted official data on the average human face, you simply manipulated your "calculation" to end up with the same results that you got using the pan-cake faces.Tell me where i manipulated which number to arrive at 3100 mm plus turret width at the turret center,
You don't even know that the height mentioned by DRDO included the height the gun as well and
wondered aloud that Arjun cannot be any shorter than LEO,
But you have the gall to sermon us that Arjun should not be compared to LEO , just because it looks like it,
You had the gall to suggest to using "CHINESE " average face width to meausure the turret font of Indian Arjun!!!!!! to suit your argumnets ,
You said just a couple of post before that i was unfairly using photos taken at,"DIFFERENT " angles to base my extravagant claims,
Then you posted five photos all of a sudden and asked me to look at me,
WHY?
After saying photos taken at different angles should not be used for measurement , why did you post photos?
And why did you ask to use the average chinese face width to measure Arjun turret?
The angles don't count then?
So were you fair angel of all?
I said in general terms a human face is a feet wide,So in real world analogy is it three feet wide?
No it is somewhere around 250 mm, and i used the same corrected figure for calculation after that,
What is wrong with that?
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!
when you wanted me to accept your chinese facewidth claim?
Please refer where I manipulated your noble data to end up with wrong results with the intention of cheating you,
I will try my best to clarify,
Will you?
Do you have a link? I think I have seen it too.That pic was posted by miltrysta , so that I took it to be the main sight optics,