This one doesn't look like AMCA ...:taunt1:With FGFA and Aura coming into IAF and the arrival of Chinas first aircraft carrier with more capable fighters, MoD understood that the real requirement for a new stealth fighter is in IN and that N-LCA is not enough for Indias naval security. Therefor they re-consider the N-LCA development and assigned ADA and HAL to develop a naval AMCA, based on the experience gained from the N-LCA Tech Demonstrator and the FGFA co-development.
As part of the Rafale procurement, MoD demands Dassault to provide design and navalising assistance, to make AMCA able to take off via catapults and ski-jumps, similar to Rafale. Here are few designs that they are working on...
http://on.fb.me/1fg14KB
Somehow the picture got changed after I have uploadedThis one doesn't look like AMCA ...:taunt1:
Is it official ? - NoTwinblade,
At least Makmohan's post has given us some food for thought... its a good way of exploring all aspect growth of a single platform like Tejas.
Plenty of universities are taking part in this project, however they are contributing at a more fundamental level (dielectrics, radar absorbing optically transparent material, frequency selective surface materials etc).any idea which university is taking part in this project? read somewhere the some Indian firm are working on large panel display, is it true or speculative?
Fanboyish, yes. Yet it merits brief consideration regarding risk-reduction. Namely, using a powerplant already being produced in India. Besides, AMCA as currently envisioned doesn't mesh well with reality either as no pair of engines that small (dimensionally) in production (anywhere) will provide sufficient thrust. (Note that J-31 and all other medium, twin-engine 5th generation concepts have the same problem.)Yeah, that image is fake and made by some fanboy. Not an official LCA/MCA image.
Not in production but not far away from it.Namely, using a powerplant already being produced in India. Besides, AMCA as currently envisioned does mesh well with reality either as no pair of engines that small (dimensionally) in production (anywhere) will provide sufficient thrust.
EPE isn't even close to being funded, let alone going into production (USN is more interested in EDE upgrade). As for the Eurojet, there is substantial room for growth (even more than F414); but again, no one appears to be seriously interested in funding such a thing. Neither is any more likely to happen than a 120 kN version of Kavari.Not in production but not far away from it.
GE F414 family (EPE variant)
EJ200 family (already built with plenty of scope for growth EJ220/EJ230 etc)
The only other choice is Saturn's Item 30 engine. But, it's not happening, so no point talking about it.Fanboyish, yes. Yet it merits brief consideration regarding risk-reduction. Namely, using a powerplant already being produced in India. Besides, AMCA as currently envisioned doesn't mesh well with reality either as no pair of engines that small (dimensionally) in production (anywhere) will provide sufficient thrust. (Note that J-31 and all other medium, twin-engine 5th generation concepts have the same problem.)
Depending on how far along the project is, there may or may not be a point in talking about anything. Given that sufficiently powerful engines are unlikely to be available, HAL would probably be doing themselves a favor if they left super-cruising/TVC to the FGFA and instead focused on range, payload, and signature.The only other choice is Saturn's Item 30 engine. But, it's not happening, so no point talking about it.
Not sure but IIT Bangalore get few chances in some DRDO projects.any idea which university is taking part in this project? read somewhere the some Indian firm are working on large panel display, is it true or speculative?
IISc Bangalore.Not sure but IIT Bangalore get few chances in some DRDO projects.
Supercruising and TVC is part of AMCA specs as well. It will be a two engine design, so engine specs are for 75 - 110 KN.Depending on how far along the project is, there may or may not be a point in talking about anything. Given that sufficiently powerful engines are unlikely to be available, HAL would probably be doing themselves a favor if they left super-cruising/TVC to the FGFA and instead focused on range, payload, and signature.
can't 2 kaveri engines accommodate this, as kaveri can easily give out 80 kn ?Supercruising and TVC is part of AMCA specs as well. It will be a two engine design, so engine specs are for 75 - 110 KN.