Adrian Corvus
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2019
- Messages
- 234
- Likes
- 959
Finally!! the larger model with the camo looked...weird...
Finally!! the larger model with the camo looked...weird...
It was a sleek and sexy design, now it is fatass like F-35.
He has no source.. Probably took it from DFI or secretprojects. I posted it in both places.
defence decode guy is saying its not irst it is eots
what?It was a sleek and sexy design, now it is fatass like F-35.
Ok I need to explain how Whitcombs area-ruling works (for those who don't), so that all you fuckers can properly understand the point of the fatassery... Tag anyone who has the same trouble.It was a sleek and sexy design, now it is fatass like F-35.
Nice design!
I don’t care fat or not !!Ok I need to explain how Whitcombs area-ruling works (for those who don't), so that all you fuckers can properly understand the point of the fatassery... Tag anyone who has the same trouble.
In simplest words this is an ideal curve, that the area of cross-section of the jet should plot on a graph, along the whole length of the jet (marked in black). That's the only thing that dictates its shaping... otherwise you can shape it like yo-mom if you want, doesn't matter as long as its shape follow the rule.
But that can't be achieved in practice & the actual curve usually deviates as depicted.
View attachment 90065
Now, you will note that after the front tends to remain pinched, middle becomes excessively large & the end tends to drop abruptly.
So this is how the shape modifications tend to work.. They increase the cross-sectional are where needed (canop bulge & elongated tail), while reducing it where needed (famous coke-bottle shape in the middle at wings).
This way you try to achieve as close to the ideal area-graph as possible.
View attachment 90067
So whole detrimental to stealth characteristics, this old sleek AMCA cannot match the performance of the new, fat AMCA due to much higher drag it faces from inferior area-ruling.
Interestingly the top side of the AMCA's latest model from behind the cockpit onwards is very Su-57ish. Especially how the engine tunnels diverge.Ok I need to explain how Whitcombs area-ruling works (for those who don't), so that all you fuckers can properly understand the point of the fatassery... Tag anyone who has the same trouble.
In simplest words this is an ideal curve, that the area of cross-section of the jet should plot on a graph, along the whole length of the jet (marked in black). That's the only thing that dictates its shaping... otherwise you can shape it like yo-mom if you want, doesn't matter as long as its shape follow the rule.
But that can't be achieved in practice & the actual curve usually deviates as depicted.
View attachment 90065
Now, you will note that after the front tends to remain pinched, middle becomes excessively large & the end tends to drop abruptly.
So this is how the shape modifications tend to work.. They increase the cross-sectional are where needed (canop bulge & elongated tail), while reducing it where needed (famous coke-bottle shape in the middle at wings).
This way you try to achieve as close to the ideal area-graph as possible.
View attachment 90067
So whole detrimental to stealth characteristics, this old sleek AMCA cannot match the performance of the new, fat AMCA due to much higher drag it faces from inferior area-ruling.
Less fuel consumption ,higher efficiency , variables thrust with good efficiencycan someone here explain the benefits of adaptive cycle engines(operational advntages)
any infrared signature reduction advantages??????Less fuel consumption ,higher efficiency , variables thrust with good efficiency
Obviously ,in cruise modeany infrared signature reduction advantages??????
no i was asking whether on the same super cruise speed (say mach1.4) on normal engines vs adaptive cycle engines will there be any advantages for the latter?Obviously ,in cruise mode
Yeah somewhat , as they will have the third cycle where extra air can be added to improve efficiency and cool at the same time so ir will surely go down , I don't know whether it will have afterburner or not , itay eliminate afterburner , but that part I am not aware of muchno i was asking whether on the same super cruise speed (say mach1.4) on normal engines vs adaptive cycle engines will there be any advantages for the latter?
wow no afterburner, if true than it would be huge advantageYeah somewhat , as they will have the third cycle where extra air can be added to improve efficiency and cool at the same time so ir will surely go down , I don't know whether it will have afterburner or not , itay eliminate afterburner , but that part I am not aware of much
I mean I don't know about it ,most of research was done on f 135 and f136 core , so don't know about afterburnerwow no afterburner, if true than it would be huge advantage
Transonic acceleration will be way better compared normal engines!no i was asking whether on the same super cruise speed (say mach1.4) on normal engines vs adaptive cycle engines will there be any advantages for the latter?
Pixellated camo, which members here call ugly.any infrared signature reduction advantages??????