- Joined
- Jan 26, 2021
- Messages
- 7,365
- Likes
- 27,771
Is it your work?Ya'll NibbiarsView attachment 78885
Is it your work?Ya'll NibbiarsView attachment 78885
Yes, inspired from an ADA slide.Is it your work?
Don't think so. Its fine for proper development and testing.Seems to be too late
Does the Chink J-20 have that?Don't think so. Its fine for proper development and testing.
Neh that radar is accused of being a israeli based tech with gaAs , same goes in junk fighter.Does the Chink J-20 have that?
Which all have GaNradars?Neh that radar is accused of being a israeli based tech with gaAs , same goes in junk fighter.
Not known. It has 1872 TR as reported by Chinese. That number seems way high.Does the Chink J-20 have that?
Is it GaAs or GaN based radar?Not known. It has 1872 TR as reported by Chinese. That number seems way high.
Gripen one and captor e , later is yet to be fully operational , future f 35 upgrade may use it , chinese developing too , also hanwa is in progress to make itWhich all have GaNradars?
GaAsIs it GaAs or GaN based radar?
Should be GaAs as no one has claimed except saab of functional GaN. I am not sure if any functional production GaN radar is their in any fighter jet yet.Is it GaAs or GaN based radar?
Why not do a joint development of GaN Radar with SAAB with IPR Belonging to India?Should be GaAs as no one has claimed except saab of functional GaN. I am not sure if any functional production GaN radar is their in any fighter jet yet.
EOTS is like a conformal targetting pod lite. Targetting pod increases RCS hence EOTS can become useful at less capability.@Ghost hale , is it possible to change number of ejector in iwb of amca .
Earlier there was a debate here on Eots capability , do you have any info on amca avionics for tracking and fire control , what i have read gives a impression that EOTS is not much useful
Why do you think they are more capable , also it's selex who are responsible for radar part. That radar is based on captor e research , our own gan vivialdi is ready , Don't go by looks of uttam , it is a potent system and by the time amca will hit the skies it will be readyWhy not do a joint development of GaN Radar with SAAB with IPR Belonging to India?
We already have GaN technology by LRDE. We don't need external help for that. Its implementation and testing which everyone is working on.Why not do a joint development of GaN Radar with SAAB with IPR Belonging to India?
Is it really used for targeting , isn't it for tracking purpose?EOTS is like a conformal targetting pod lite. Targetting pod increases RCS hence EOTS can become useful at less capability.
That’s what I said, a Targetting pod lite.Is it really used for targeting , isn't it for tracking purpose?
EOTS capabilities are more and more software based then anything. And any 5th gen fighter depends on multiple situational sensors for more data. Thus EOTS makes sense.@Ghost hale , is it possible to change number of ejector in iwb of amca .
Earlier there was a debate here on Eots capability , do you have any info on amca avionics for tracking and fire control , what i have read gives a impression that EOTS is not much useful
What is the E/W Suite of AMCA? Can we achieve Spectra E/W Suite level E/W Suite on ourselves.EOTS capabilities are more and more software based then anything. And any 5th gen fighter depends on multiple situational sensors for more data. Thus EOTS makes sense.
For change in number of ejector, As far as i know that is finalized at 4.