WARREN SS
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2013
- Messages
- 5,570
- Likes
- 20,878
AMCA will not sufferedNot only Mk2, but the whole developmental path to AMCA and beyond would be stunted due to lack of funds soaked by 90 (mfg. eco-system n tech on MK2 would be sharpened for future platforms) . In a no funds constraints situation (subjective), maybe the choices would be easier. Given that the government seems to be 'very' keen on defence exports (which also ties up the destination country to the supplier strategically for decades), it seems that MK2 would be inducted by IAF in large numbers.
* In my opinion, the only thing other than MK2 that would have changed government's mind vis-a-vis IAF requirement would be ORCA, had it been at a similar life cycle stage as MK2 (Still won't make sense from exports POV)
** I also believe that if IAF requires some more 4.5 gen aircrafts beyond the scheduled (we don't know the final number) purchase of MK2, it would be ORCA. Might look at it somewhere around the start of deliveries of MK2 and TEDBF.
*** Could a forum member educate me on why won't the airforce be interested in ORCA (if there is a logic beyond funds n interest in imported planes)
Edit: Have read the discussions on ORCA, but couldn't find a conclusion, therefore my query on ***
Has there is mass private participation
In project
Most of critical technology already funded through by Govt and will be completed before 2025
Also IAF also cutting MLU cost by half through Indeginious options
Funds by 2030 when orders of AMCA will given
Military budget will be around
150 billion $
So no AMCA will far from threat window
Mk2 and OCRA definitely is on cutting edge as it's not adding anything new except
Medium category aircrafts
If add both projects the Cost itself goes beyond
25-30 billion $
But TEDBF will go through by Navy
No 1 priority should be Turbofan engines
Without it all Indeginious efforts and ecosystem is Pipe dream
Last edited: