So all air crafts need some special adaptation in high altitude areas , may be for the fuel starters and it says nothing negative about the airframe design or some basic design problem,"Recently we went for high-altitude trials. The engine (of LCA) did not work at that altitude because it is a different cup of tea. Even the Su-30, when it was taken to Leh, it had to be modified. So, the LCA will have to be modified. It has to do the retrials," he was quoted as saying.
How many Flight Tests for LCA prototype needed..I think till 2013 only Flight tests rather than induction Process or Mass productionLCA-Tejas has Completed 2006 Test Flights successfully.(05-Feb-2013).
(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-222,PV3-349,LSP1-74,LSP2-242,PV5-36,LSP3-96,LSP4-61,LSP5-124,LSP7-18,NP1-4)
From
LCA-Tejas has Completed 1995 Test Flights successfully.(29-Jan-2013).
(TD1-233,TD2-305,PV1-242,PV2-222,PV3-348,LSP1-74,LSP2-239,PV5-36,LSP3-95,LSP4-57,LSP5-122,LSP7-18,NP1-4)
It is not about the number of flights. But it is about LCA meeting the performance parameters required from it. As of now, its flight envelope opened hasn't been opened fully. In addition, I read somewhere that wake penetration and turnaround tests also haven't been performed. Also it is yet to fire a BVR missile.How many Flight Tests for LCA prototype needed..I think till 2013 only Flight tests rather than induction Process or Mass production
One of the side effect of going alone in aircraft development without an experienced partner is reflected in calibrating airodata values. The airodata sensors on the skin of the aircraft will only give you localised values, where as what is important is the airstream values. Thus the air data collected from the sensors has to be calibrated to +-0.5% accuracy while determining the airstream values. Here again we are talking about multitude of airflow angles and speeds, especially in the transonic region where airflow cannot be accurately predicted by cfd analysis and simulations, especially closer to the boundaries. It was only 4-5 years back, that the LCA team were able to successfully validate and predict the accuracy of the pre production aircraft vis-a-vis the wind tunnel models ei deviation of the real world model from computer and wind tunnel model. Most other manufacturers gained that experience by thousands of hours of flight testing, while we saved on flight testing, but due to the lack of experience, we wasted time setting up and validating our models. The lack of pre existing research in aero data sets led to very conservative incremental testing, where variables were added incrementally by extrapolation of flight data and matching the modelling parameters to real world data.As of now, its flight envelope opened hasn't been opened fully.
Wake penetration trials are not just a few tests, its a whole series of tests and is also a very long process. Basically every aircraft leaves a pattern of turbulent airflow in its wake. So while penetrating the wake of a lead-in aircraft (say a refueler or any large aircraft which is being escorted), there are a few zones where the fighter will have to encounter turbulent airflow. This leads to inaccurate data from the air data sensors, because systems often employ cross comparison of data from sensors to validate data and detect system failures. Due to the turbulent airflow, the sensors will give you largely deviating values. So you have to penetrate wakes from every possible approach angle and speed to document the behaviour the aircraft would have under those circumstances. Also the wake of the aircraft itself has to be documented so that its wake does not endanger other aircraft.In addition, I read somewhere that wake penetration and turnaround tests also haven't been performed.
http://www51.honeywell.com/aero/com..._Brochures-documents/Life_Support_Systems.pdfguys what is on board oxygen generation system...?? i mean how does it work...? and this concept revolutionary in any way...??
Navy will be using NLCA Mk-1 only for training purpose, still 4 single seater variants are ordered. Can anyone explain me why it is so?
I pointed this out early on when someone here asked about the difference in operation between PAKFA's LERX and the LCA's LEVCONs.I tried to ask him if the LEVCONS would be just lift generating surfaces or that they could be used as additional control surfaces by the FBW FCS to increase turn rates but he said that they were primarily required for higher lift when landing and taking off
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Indian Air Force | 8939 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |