Defenceindia2010
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
- Messages
- 449
- Likes
- 324
Lets see them in large numbers in the IAF inventory.
Lets see them in large numbers in the IAF inventory.
Two more years before flight envelope is fully opened. It may be achieved on one of the SP models.Can someone tell, whether the LSPs been tested to their maximum performance limits ??
Looks like they just want slightly a better one, If not then its ok according to ADA, If the dimensions are same latter these LCA can be upgraded..ADA is looking for another radome to compare -- if the new one is better, great. If it isn't, tough, they'll stick with the old one, though surface smoothness needs to be "equivalent or better".
Bad news for the LCA program. ADA not satisfied with the current radome.
Livefist: Reality Check: Tejas Needs A New Radome
Tarmak007 -- A bold blog on Indian defence: Freeze design issues early for timely delivery of products: AntonyThe Defence Minister Shri AK Antony today asked all stake holders to have regular deliberations and solve their problems within the initial stages of any project or programme for timely delivery of the same to the Services. Speaking at an international seminar on " Challenges in Design to Deployment of the Aerospace Products" on the eve of the inauguration of Aero India 2013 in Bangalore, Shri Antony said 'our Mantra must be jointness in day-to-day working, if we wish to suceed in reducing the content of the imported weaponry and increase the indigenous content.'
I did not find spark's post on this thread or in the IAF subforum. Sorry if I have overlooked something.Looks like they just want slightly a better one, If not then its ok according to ADA, If the dimensions are same latter these LCA can be upgraded..
I think @SpArK posted this before in details..
See the guy just sensationalizes news items, with no technical explanation of what is wrong with the RADOME.I did not find spark's post on this thread or in the IAF subforum. Sorry if I have overlooked something.
Yeah, I did not understand why did you need to quote me, however he has clearly said he doesn't know what is wrong with radome, he is has also written something he thinks that could be the reason for ADA asking for a new one.See the guy just sensationalizes news items, with no technical explanation of what is wrong with the RADOME.
He does not even specifies whether it is part of a private sector participation initiative taken on by ADA or whether it is for ASEA of MK-2 or MK-1?
and most of the posters are there are at the same level of anonymous excellence not knowing anything technical, and they just jump like frogs in a well for all the so called scoops he dumps.
sensational journalism should never be mistaken for genuine defense reporting.
He never ever goes to any technical people associated with the program or any other outside technical expert for any clarification on any item he posts that require deep technical explanation.
Even if you visit the blog for another thousand years you would be a technical illiterate not knowing even simple things that are explained in other debate based forums.
RADOMEs are produced in HAL for all kinds of fighters from SUKHOI to MIGs for ages , it is no rocket science.
He never writes any deep analysis or comparision of any thing.
product improvements are always an ongoing process, no fault of tejas program is a top secret. It has been torn apart in every media .
As tejas LSp-7 in operational configuration is already in IAf's hands , where is the need for this naval gazing.
India is not China...Easy solution, put those people to jail! Some people have to take responsibilty.
I am pretty sure it is merely a part of the program, perhaps even anticipated by ADA beforehand.Every engine has a limit of starting altitude and so does the presurisation system. In A-320 and B738s we faced similar problems in Leh. The engine starting was modified and the aircraft pressurisation system was used in manual mode to overcome these difficulties. These ac operated without any problems after that. LCA will also overcome these problems without any problems but shocking part is that our DRDO cud not think of these problems before hand.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
AERO INDIA 2021 | Science and Technology | 308 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Knowledge Repository | 6 | ||
ADA Tejas Mark-II/Medium Weight Fighter | Indian Air Force | 8939 | ||
P | ADA DRDO and HAL Delays a threat to National Security | Internal Security | 20 |