- Joined
- Oct 9, 2020
- Messages
- 7,650
- Likes
- 21,949
So you , everyplace in South is daulatabad .Just like Muhammad bin tuglaq moved capital from Delhi to daulatabag and failed miserably ?
By the way it's devagiri .
So you , everyplace in South is daulatabad .Just like Muhammad bin tuglaq moved capital from Delhi to daulatabag and failed miserably ?
Nagpur is super hot with temperatures rising to 47 degrees in summer and people falling to sunstroke. Even ACs don't work . Nashik and Kolhapur are cooler and kolhapur is very cool even in may . I don't really recommend a capital in satpuras and vindhyas because mountain capital is so British mindset like shimla as summer capital of the raj . But capital city even in the plains should be having cooler temperature while Nagpur is literally the hottest place in India .Archaeological evidence is sufficient is verify it's existence. Indraprasth's existence is a much much older instance than that of Ujjain or Vijaynagar. Since it was possibly invaded and ruined by foreigners, it doesn't standstill like many old cities today.
I don't have any great admiration for Delhi as capital and will support Nagpur instead. I was only refuting this incorrect statement.
This is factually incorrect.
Plus ujjain also was ruled , chandra gupta vikramadityaNew capital Should be in Ujjain or any city in MP which was under Malwa region ruled by Raja Bhoj. Strategically it would make sense too as it will be in central India equidistant from south and north cities. Also away from borders and threats.
Malwa region ruled by Pratiharas were one of the strongest Hindu kingdom and will help in shedding the burden of mughal history.
Yes It was perhaps one of the most powerful Hindu kingdom. Ghaznavi ran away with tails tucked between his legs when he heard the news of Raja Bhoj coming after him. Pratiharas played a crucial.role in defeating turks in great battle of Rajasthan. If any day Bharat is reborn its capital should be in Malwa region. May be Ujjain city of Mahakaal.Plus ujjain also was ruled , chandra gupta vikramaditya
Ujjain is not a modern and people seem to be illiterate and infrastructure is in ruins and town is totally unclean . I have been there but left soon seeing the condition of the city . Indore is modern city and clean and neat .New capital Should be in Ujjain or any city in MP which was under Malwa region ruled by Raja Bhoj. Strategically it would make sense too as it will be in central India equidistant from south and north cities. Also away from borders and threats.
Malwa region ruled by Pratiharas were one of the strongest Hindu kingdom and will help in shedding the burden of mughal history.
Bhopal would be better place.Ujjain is not a modern and people seem to be illiterate and infrastructure is in ruins and town is totally unclean . I have been there but left soon seeing the condition of the city . Indore is modern city and clean and neat .
Yeah Bhopal is good and nice city with cleanliness and also it is relatively safe for women . But you people being hindu nationalists will have problem with large muslim population of the city . It's not considered communally sensitive and generally riots don't occur there . But the presence of almost 40 percent muslims in the city will give muslims undue influence on administration . Hindu sindhis who are post partition refugees form almost 10 percent of the population there and they are a good influence however .Bhopal would be better place.
Yeah but what was it the capital of? India? Certainly not. Lots of history but as capital of India, it’s still fairly recent. Most rulers of Delhi ruled very small parts of India.Ever heard of Indraprastha?
Forget building anything at Hampi. You couldn’t even build a bridge there without enormous issues owing to its world heritage status.Yes redeveloping Vijaynagar at Hampi is a good idea . I visited in 2009 and stayed there for 4 days . Even in it's semi destroyed state it evokes the glory of ancient hindu India because the destruction was not complete and several temples and other structures remain .
There is plenty of empty land nearby and can be developed as capital city of India . Already it has an international presence ; many hippies ( and some of them lusciously beautiful blonde blue eyed girls ) crowd there having free sex and irritating the locals who are conservative hindus and frown on this kind of lifestyle . It can be developed as a capital city and major international tourism center both .Forget building anything at Hampi. You couldn’t even build a bridge there without enormous issues owing to its world heritage status.
Dont talk rubbish.Ujjain is not a modern and people seem to be illiterate and infrastructure is in ruins and town is totally unclean . I have been there but left soon seeing the condition of the city . Indore is modern city and clean and neat .
May be he visited there long time ago.Dont talk rubbish.
It has much much better Infrastructure then most of towns and cities having population below 10 Lacs.
A Capital City comes with it's own infrastructure, hence your point is absurd at most.
But I would like to be India's capital like Canberra (Australia) or Washington DC (USA), just Administrative Head, no hustle and bustle of Crowded Commercial Mega Town.
But in Indian Context should have Cultural and Historical back ground.
In this context Ujjain suits the the best as it is in Center on India equidistance from every corner of the country and safe enough deep inside the center of the Country.
No other place has benefits of Ujjaini with Historical Background, neither Patliputra or Ayodhya.
I really dont know when he visited but truly speaking Ujjain gets its Infrastructure upgraded with every Sinhastha in every 12 year.May be he visited there long time ago.
I had visited last year albeit for few hours only. My visit was for Mahakaal darshan. I didn't find infra and cleanliness to be that bad. Indore however is on a different level. But both need work if they are chosen, by an chance to be capital.May be he visited there long time ago.
What ? That's a negative mindset if we had to learn we have enough to look into but we don't.Instead history should preserved to remind us , of dreary consequences.
Delhi have been capital of India for longI don't think so , delhi before islamic age was not even capital of prithviraj , it was ajmer ( correct. Me , if iam wrong )
India has been united two times at its maximum before islam came into being , first during maurya and second during gupta age .
Maurya's had their capital at patliputra , gupta are said to have first ruled from patliputra but later probably shifted to ujjain or prayag .
Only inscription in delhi is a samudragupt prashasti , indraprasth location is just thought to be near delhi , near purana kila to be specific .