- Joined
- Mar 24, 2009
- Messages
- 24,325
- Likes
- 11,768
Akbar and Tipu do not qualify as per OP. Even if the scope is expanded to include all the greatest rulers, i think Tipu will still not fit the bill as he was a small regional ruler and not a pan India one like Akbar. Tipu was confined to certain regions in south India only.
I would also suggest rules to quality otherwise.
1) Vastness of the empire
2) Military expeditions and their successes
3) Administrative skills
4) Culture, Literary and art.
5) Science and technological advances
6) Popularity among the subjects
i would imagine that the bravery of a king does not qualify for greatness. Thinking from the point of view of maintaining vast empires. Someone like Rana Pratap may be a great warrior who fought the Moghuls heroically , but he did not have a large kingdom. For most of his life, he was on the run organizing guerrilla attacks on the Moghul army.
Looking in this context, let us list and vote for the greatest kings/emperors of India.
I would also suggest rules to quality otherwise.
1) Vastness of the empire
2) Military expeditions and their successes
3) Administrative skills
4) Culture, Literary and art.
5) Science and technological advances
6) Popularity among the subjects
i would imagine that the bravery of a king does not qualify for greatness. Thinking from the point of view of maintaining vast empires. Someone like Rana Pratap may be a great warrior who fought the Moghuls heroically , but he did not have a large kingdom. For most of his life, he was on the run organizing guerrilla attacks on the Moghul army.
Looking in this context, let us list and vote for the greatest kings/emperors of India.