Sukhoi Su-35 Flanker-E

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
New Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
It is not clearly to me why some fanboys will insist comparing a heavy class air superiority fighter Su-35 to a medium class multirole Rafale.

They are different classes and designed to do different things. When shit hits the fans, IA is gonna send in MKIs, not Rafale to engange possible Su-35s.

But do carry on with the hmmm "discussion", boys. :rolleyes:
Because Rafale is superior technology and better survivability. Su-35 will be dodging Meteors before it ever sees her.
 

gokussj9

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag

badguy2000

Respected Member
New Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
well, the framework agreement is credible..however, it is a long way to turn the framework to a certain sale.
the future sale is still full of uncertainty.

1. the framework is not the formal constract.
2. the 4 "lada" is a cooprated project,instead of a simple sale....China will provide AIP tech to the 4 lada
3. Su35 sale is full of uncertainty,just like the sale of Tu22 sale reported long ago
 
Last edited:

Shirman

New Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

first of all i guess all the air-dominance and interception will be taken care by mig-29upg, tejas mk-1/mk-2,in future mirage-2000-5mk2 so the options of su-35 and typoon which were designed for air-domination does't cut the bill......multirole is the need for the hour right now and the only two fighters from the mmrca table were f/a-18 super hornet international roadmap which i still personally like and rafale f.3 with cfts........though jaguar upgrade with iai aesa radar and python-5/r-74 or RVV-MD also provides decent air-dominance at point defence.........btw someone told me that official range of meteor missile is 180kms though its classified as of now......can anybody confirm this.....thanks in advance
 
Last edited:

WMD

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
624
Likes
794
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

first of all i guess all the air-dominance and interception will be taken care by mig-29upg, tejas mk-1/mk-2,in future mirage-2000-5mk2 so the options of su-35 and typoon which were designed for air-domination does't cut the bill......multirole is the need for the hour right now and the only two fighters from the mmrca table were f/a-18 super hornet international roadmap which i still personally like and rafale f.3 with cfts........though jaguar upgrade with iai aesa radar and python-5/r-74 or RVV-MD also provides decent air-dominance at point defence.........btw someone told me that official range of meteor missile is 180kms though its classified as of now......can anybody confirm this.....thanks in advance
for now and foreseeable future air-dominance will remain with the MKI and MiG-29UPGs, then it will b surpassed to the PMF.
all the fighters in MMRCA were multi-role, typhoon's capabilities were just not matured.
SHs r not as agile as rafale and we did good by not selecting them, the americans would hav dragged their feet much more than the french for ToT,
earlier only jaguar IM variants had agave radars, later replaced by EL/M-2032(same as Tejas Mk-I).
no. of IM variants is very less(12).
in the darin III upgrade the IS variants r also getting EL/M-2032 radars, so IAF jaguars will hav limited a2a capability,
darin-iii upgrade also includes new engine, new cockpit display, more payload and such
this is from the SIPRI register,
10 EL/M-2032 Combat ac radar 1999 1999-2005 (10) $16 m deal; for modernization of 10 Jaguar-M combat aircraft
for jaguar IS variants,
(100) EL/M-2032 Combat ac radar 2012 $150 m deal; for modernization of Jaguar combat aircraft to DARIN-3 version
AFAIK there is no official confirmation regarding meteor missile range.
 

Shirman

New Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

in the darin III upgrade the IS variants r also getting EL/M-2032 radars, so IAF jaguars will hav limited a2a capability,
darin-iii upgrade also includes new engine, new cockpit display, more payload and such
this is from the SIPRI register,
No i was talking about the new EL/M-2052 unveiled at Aero-India 13 with new module architecture designed specifically to fit into compact spaces like the Jaguar and LCA mk.1 nose last i heard talks going on between partnership between LRDE and IAI regarding the same.........


Speaking on the same topic one Ukrainian company also presented Spectra type defensive suite for mig-29upgs, and future tejas mk.2 at this Aero-India sorry i can't post pics for the same
 
Last edited:

WMD

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
624
Likes
794
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

No i was talking about the new EL/M-2052 unveiled at Aero-India 13 with new module architecture designed specifically to fit into compact spaces like the Jaguar and LCA mk.1 nose last i heard talks going on between partnership between LRDE and IAI regarding the same.........


Speaking on the same topic one Ukrainian company also presented Spectra type defensive suite for mig-29upgs, and future tejas mk.2 at this Aero-India sorry i can't post pics for the same
ye, i know that u were talking abt the EL/M-2052 radar,
but installing high end AESA radars in old jaguars which primarily were ground attack planes without emphasis on aerodynamic performance in case of a2a warfare wouldn't hav been prudent.
earlier there was only speculation that the 150 million $ contract for EL/M-2032 radars was with India, but the now SIPRI confirms it.
the darin-iii upgrades r the last upgrade before jaguars r retired.
as far as EL/M-2052 goes, LCA Mk-II prototype will probably hav it a s radar but production variants r stated to get an indigenous AESA radar, the work on which is in advanced stages as said by Saraswat in an interview.
from the same SIPRI trade register,

EL/M-2052 Combat ac radar (2009) For Tejas (LCA) combat aircraft produced in India; bought after Indian development of radar delayed
before 18 march the no. was given as 1, but now no no. is given.
and if i remember correctly it was a 95 million $ contract.

MiG-29UPGs and Tejas Mk-II will hav tarang EW suit.
 

WMD

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
624
Likes
794
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

srry got confused with names, tarang is rwr.
i don't know how reliable is prasun sengupta's blog, but here u go,
this is for Mk-I
The EW suite has already been finalized & will include the Tarang Mk3 RWR, MILDS AR-60V2 missile approach warning system (MAWS) and Elettronica Spa's ELT-568 AESA-based internal EW jammer (like the Spectra from THALES). These AESA-based active-array jammers can also engage in active cancellation techniques, whuich is a very promising R & D arena as far as active stealth goes.
Mk-II
TRISHUL: Virgilius AESA-Based Internal EW Suite For MiG-29UPG & Tejas Mk2
 

Shirman

New Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Re: Why Su-35 would not pose any serious security threat to India's Ra

srry got confused with names, tarang is rwr.
i don't know how reliable is prasun sengupta's blog, but here u go,
this is for Mk-I

Mk-II
TRISHUL: Virgilius AESA-Based Internal EW Suite For MiG-29UPG & Tejas Mk2
No a company called as Radionix of Ukraine anyways so the point is there are alternatives....:cool2::thumb:

Okz so a nasty question can't we let our super su-30mki be converted into e/a-18g growler after all it will have ram coating,aesa radar and currently we usually have iai/elta jammers Elta EL/M-8222 as its wing tip/Self Protection Pod can't we add escort jammer pod for air-to-ground offensive like the raytheon version onboard e/a-18g.....
something like this:-
 
Last edited by a moderator:

huaxia rox

New Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,401
Likes
103
Russia: No Deal on Sale of Fighters, Subs to China | Defense News | defensenews.com

TAIPEI — Russia is denying Chinese media claims that Moscow and Beijing have signed agreements to sell Russian-made arms and military technology to China, including 24 Su-35 multirole fighter jets and four Amur-class diesel submarines.

During a recent visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Moscow from Friday to Sunday, no discussions took place regarding "military-technical cooperation" issues, the ITAR-TASS news agency reported Monday. This was in response to an earlier report by China's CCTV on the same day.

"The Kremlin is officially denying even discussing arms trade during Xi's visit," said Vasiliy Kashin, a China military specialist at the Moscow-based Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies (CAST). "In Russia-China relations, specific arms trade contracts are almost never discussed by the top leaders, just the general approaches."

Another defense industry source in Russia said there are strong reservations about going forward on the memorandum of understanding signed in December to explore the sale of the twin-engine Su-35s and Amur submarines to China.

China intentionally violated intellectual property right (IPR) agreements when it copied and manufactured Russia's Su-27 fighter as the J-11B, according to Russia.

In 1995, China secured a production deal with Russia to build 200 Su-27SKs, dubbed the J-11A, for $2.5 billion for the Shenyang Aircraft Corp. In 2006, Russia canceled the deal after 95 aircraft when it discovered China had reverse-engineered the fighter and was secretly manufacturing an indigenous copy, the J-11B, with Chinese-made avionics and engines.

There are strong suspicions China will procure the technological know-how of the Su-35 and Amur and simply produce an indigenous version.

But not all agree. Gary Li, a senior analyst at London-based IHS Fairplay, said China's research and development have moved forward.

"It no longer will seek to directly reverse engineer everything it buys, but maybe adopt parts of the platform for other projects [and] integrate into domestic designs," he said.

There also are concerns China wants access to the Su-35's Saturn AL-117S engine, which is outfitted on the T-50, a prototype of Russia's fifth-generation Sukhoi PAK FA stealth fighter.

However, Kashin said the risks of selling the Russian engine to China are negligible.

"An engine cannot be copied by obtaining a sample," he said.

Li said he could envision Chinese aerospace engineers studying the aircraft's engine and thrust-vectoring for future inclusion, as well as the Amur sub's air-independent propulsion, but it will still be more than a decade before China will stop having to order engines to replace "worn-out ones," as it has been doing with the J-11 and J-10 fighters.

"It always takes a few years before they can make a domestic alternative," Li said.

Kashin cautions that a Chinese attempt to copy the Su-35, as they did with the Su-27, would be more difficult, "because this time, our Ukrainian 'brothers' cannot help them by selling the Chinese all the technology they lacked for a handful of dollars. I think the Amur situation will be generally the same."

Ukraine has been accused of selling China former Soviet defense technologies, but it has no access to information regarding newer systems, such as the Su-35 and Amur.

"The Amur ultimately isn't a strategic submarine, and as Russia's interests in the Far East are not yet that ambitious, they can afford to sell them to China," Li said. "How better to keep the U.S. pivot off their backs?"
 

Daredevil

On Vacation!
New Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2009
Messages
11,615
Likes
5,775
China 'buys fighter jets and submarines from Russia'

25 March 2013 Last updated at 16:43 GMT One report said the new Russian Su-35 jets would "reduce the pressure on China's air defence"
China has agreed to buy 24 fighter jets and four submarines from Russia, Chinese state media report.

It is reported to be the first time in a decade that China has made a large-scale military purchase from Russia.

Two of the submarines will be built in Russia and two in China.

The deal, signed just before last weekend's visit to Moscow by the Chinese President, Xi Jinping, comes as both sides increase military co-operation.

Correspondents say Moscow and Beijing are trying to counterbalance what they see as American military dominance.

China is buying 24 Su-35 fighters and four Lada-class submarines, reported the Communist Party organ the People's Daily and China Central Television (CCTV).

They did not put a value on the purchases.

China's official defence budget rose by 11.2% in 2012 - pushing it above $100bn (£65bn) for the first time. But foreign experts have estimated that Beijing's actual military spending could be as much as double the official budget.

US defence spending was reported as standing at more than $700bn.

Beijing - which is also embroiled in a bitter row over disputed islands with Japan - launched its first aircraft carrier last year.

"The Su-35 fighters can effectively reduce pressure on China's air defence before Chinese-made stealth fighters come online," the People's Daily was quoted as saying.

It said the two countries were expected to co-operate further in developing military technology - including for S-400 long-range anti-aircraft missiles, 117S large thrust engines, IL-476 large transport aircraft and IL-78 aerial tankers.

'Riposte'

Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Moscow from Friday to Sunday for talks with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin - his first trip abroad since becoming head of state earlier this month.

The two countries are also pursuing a number of deals for Russia to supply Chinese industry with oil and liquefied natural gas.

President Xi's visit was lauded by the state-run China Daily as a "well-deserved riposte to Washington for America's military 'pivot' to Asia. Xi is executing China's own 'pivot' - the visit to Moscow to cement ties with" Mr Putin, the paper said.

"Xi's decision to make Moscow the destination of his first official visit as China's president will give the US a sharp reminder that it is not the only power able to flex its muscles," the report, translated by BBC Monitoring, went on.

BBC News - China 'buys fighter jets and submarines from Russia'
 

ice berg

New Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
A golden opportunity for Chinese to do a Ctrl C & Ctrl V...
Try to activate your brain next time.

However, Kashin said the risks of selling the Russian engine to China are negligible.

"An engine cannot be copied by obtaining a sample," he said.
 

gokussj9

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag
Try to activate your brain next time.

However, Kashin said the risks of selling the Russian engine to China are negligible.

"An engine cannot be copied by obtaining a sample," he said.
How credible is chinanews BTW? Is the news confirmed now or the deal is not done yet?
 

bose

New Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,921
Likes
5,963
Country flag
Try to activate your brain next time.
I do not need a brain activation any time...

Chinese are very well known for illegal copies... You even made a duplicate of IL 76 and what not and call them as yours...

However, Kashin said the risks of selling the Russian engine to China are negligible.

"An engine cannot be copied by obtaining a sample," he said.
It will be proved wrong for sure...
 

Broccoli

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2012
Messages
231
Likes
109
Russia: No Deal on Sale of Fighters, Subs to China
TAIPEI — Russia is denying Chinese media claims that Moscow and Beijing have signed agreements to sell Russian-made arms and military technology to China, including 24 Su-35 multirole fighter jets and four Amur-class diesel submarines.

During a recent visit by Chinese President Xi Jinping to Moscow from Friday to Sunday, no discussions took place regarding "military-technical cooperation" issues, the ITAR-TASS news agency reported Monday. This was in response to an earlier report by China's CCTV on the same day.
Russia: No Deal on Sale of Fighters, Subs to China | Defense News | defensenews.com
 

nrj

New Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
They are denying means the deal is signed. This is no flash. Conversations were on since 2010.
 

huaxia rox

New Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2011
Messages
1,401
Likes
103
no contract to buy any russian weapons was signed......different framework aggrement kinds of entertainning things about su-35 have been being signed annuely and regularly since around 2000.....just cant see any su-35 flying in prc.....probably apart from zhuhai airshow promotion........
 
Last edited:

Articles

Top