Sukhoi Su 30MKI

ersakthivel

Brilliance
New Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,764
Country flag
Because its delta wing and low weight construction give it better wing loading.
but according to one technocrat here wing loading is related to passenger aircraft and has no relation to fighters.And deltas will always bleed energy and only fighters with long fuselage and short wings are good fighters.

So please explain how delta wing and low wing loading can be effectively used in close combat and high AOA fights.
 

Austin

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
852
Likes
363
R-77M and RVV-SD should be very similar, but yes there will be more advantages to the R-77M.
Yefim Gordon in his book Russian Air Power mentions that R-77M under development will a fatter booster and higher specfic impulse solid porpellent giving it a range of 140-145 Km.

RVV-SD has a range of 110 km.

Not much is known about other developments including ramjet variant but a two new types of Long and Medium range AAM is under development for future PAK-FA.

Currently RVV-BD is available for Su-30MKI which has a range of 200 km , the Russian Air Force variant which is non-export type has a range of more than 250 km and is used on modernised Mig-31BM
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag
Yefim Gordon in his book Russian Air Power mentions that R-77M under development will a fatter booster and higher specfic impulse solid porpellent giving it a range of 140-145 Km.

RVV-SD has a range of 110 km.

Not much is known about other developments including ramjet variant but a two new types of Long and Medium range AAM is under development for future PAK-FA.

Currently RVV-BD is available for Su-30MKI which has a range of 200 km , the Russian Air Force variant which is non-export type has a range of more than 250 km and is used on modernised Mig-31BM
Has the RVV-BD version been inducted into IAF?
 

Shirman

New Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Yefim Gordon in his book Russian Air Power mentions that R-77M under development will a fatter booster and higher specfic impulse solid porpellent giving it a range of 140-145 Km.

RVV-SD has a range of 110 km.

Not much is known about other developments including ramjet variant but a two new types of Long and Medium range AAM is under development for future PAK-FA.

Currently RVV-BD is available for Su-30MKI which has a range of 200 km , the Russian Air Force variant which is non-export type has a range of more than 250 km and is used on modernised Mig-31BM
With an arsenal of missiles like this i sincerely doubt Russians will go for meteor-ski type ramjet missile. @Austin how do u compare Say RVV-BD to meteor type ramjet, who has more advantages.....
 
Last edited by a moderator:

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Yefim Gordon in his book Russian Air Power mentions that R-77M under development will a fatter booster and higher specfic impulse solid porpellent giving it a range of 140-145 Km.

RVV-SD has a range of 110 km.

Not much is known about other developments including ramjet variant but a two new types of Long and Medium range AAM is under development for future PAK-FA.

Currently RVV-BD is available for Su-30MKI which has a range of 200 km , the Russian Air Force variant which is non-export type has a range of more than 250 km and is used on modernised Mig-31BM
Hmm, I never read that book.

Shouldn't the extra range come from an additional booster instead of an entirely different design with a single stage booster?

Larger booster would mean bigger size and hence lesser end game maneuverability.
 

DivineHeretic

New Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
1,153
Likes
1,897
Country flag
A quick question: After the Rafale enters service with the IAF which will be the most capable fighter in A2A combat, particularly over hostile airspace?
This is important because the IAF alongwith the IA made a categoric decision that given the chance they would fight a war in the opponents territory, which could be swarming with hostile SAMs and EW systems.
Also if the Rafale emerges as the better of the two, there would need to need to be a re-evaluation of the IAF doctrine as the current doctrine marks the SU as the air superiority fighter.
Would the SU then be downgraded in status (in terms of A2A priority order)?
 
Last edited:

Austin

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
852
Likes
363
Hmm, I never read that book.

Shouldn't the extra range come from an additional booster instead of an entirely different design with a single stage booster?

Larger booster would mean bigger size and hence lesser end game maneuverability.
Ok I mentioned those what was off my head but I checked the book and this is what it says , I will just quote it directly

Several advanced air to air missile is under development for PAK-FA, at ranges up to 250 km medium range AAM designated 180-PD and powered by Ramjet engine may be used.

A shortrange of this weapon designated K-77M derivative of R-77 having a solid fuel motor is used up to ranges of 110-140 km , it has active/passive seeker head allowing missile to home on seeker source.

For close range engagement T-50 may use K-74M2 short range AAM , the missile has a matrix IR seeker head capable of discerning real targets from decoy and having twice the lock on range of R-73 AAM.

The K-74M2 has thrust vectoring control , making it agile enough to nail not only manouverable modern fighter but even incoming AAM
 

Austin

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
852
Likes
363
With an arsenal of missiles like this i sincerely doubt Russians will go for meteor-ski type ramjet missile. how do u compare Say RVV-BD to meteor type ramjet, who has more advantages.....
Both missile have their own advantage , RVV-BD is good to take out high value but low manouvering targets like AWACS ,JSTARS or Low Flying Cruise missiles at long range ( ~200 km ) but when it comes to say dealing with high manouvering targets like fighter aircraft that knows its under attack and tries hard manouvering or countermeasures then the range is drastically reduced , for eg the R-37M of which RVV-BD is an export variant is metioned to have a range of 280 Km against such high value targets when fired from a Mig-31M but against a manouvering fighter the effective range is reduced to 150 km.

Meteor or ramjet variant of AAM is good to take out manouvering target at its longest mentioned range ( effective range of 100-110 km ) since ramjet retains its end game energy much better than any solid fuel missile.

So both missile are important depending on the target you might want to take out assuming the targets knows its under attack and starts taking countermeasures.

We need both RVV-BD , Meteor and Astra/RVV-SD type missile for MKI to maintain superiority over the air ......each has its own distinct value.
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag
A quick question: After the Rafale enters service with the IAF which will be the most capable fighter in A2A combat, particularly over hostile airspace?
This is important because the IAF alongwith the IA made a categoric decision that given the chance they would fight a war in the opponents territory, which could be swarming with hostile SAMs and EW systems.
Also if the Rafale emerges as the better of the two, there would need to need to be a re-evaluation of the IAF doctrine as the current doctrine marks the SU as the air superiority fighter.
Would the SU then be downgraded in status (in terms of A2A priority order)?
I believe this will be the order:

Super Sukhoi
Rafale
Sukhoi 30MKI
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
Ok I mentioned those what was off my head but I checked the book and this is what it says , I will just quote it directly
He isn't talking about differences between R-77M and RVV-SD. He's talking about R-77M and 180-PD which seems to be an entirely different missile.

A shortrange of this weapon designated K-77M derivative of R-77 having a solid fuel motor is used up to ranges of 110-140 km , it has active/passive seeker head allowing missile to home on seeker source.
This range is okay. 110-140Km is quite like what's quoted for Aim-120C7. 110Km range at cruising speed at high altitude.

Meteor or ramjet variant of AAM is good to take out manouvering target at its longest mentioned range ( effective range of 100-110 km ) since ramjet retains its end game energy much better than any solid fuel missile.
That is not correct. There are two flight profiles for Meteor. At its longest range, the Meteor will function the same as other conventional missiles. That's because it needs to retain as much fuel as possible in order to reach its max range.

At shorter ranges, the seeker determines the distance and adjusts the speed accordingly. So at shorter ranges, the missile will pump in more juice and accelerate faster than conventional missiles. Here it starts burning fuel in a more efficient manner, meaning by the time it reaches the target the fuel will be nearly empty, unlike on conventional missiles.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
I believe this will be the order:

Super Sukhoi
Rafale
Sukhoi 30MKI
Super MKI
MKI
Rafale

The old MKIs that are to be upgraded to Super MKI are behind the Rafale and have old radars. The MKIs that have been coming out fresh from the factories since 3 years are all better than Rafale, at least in air to air because of the massive modernization the radar went through apart from other advances we know nothing about.

Dog fights, Rafale should be better than the MKI because of higher T/W. But that's no guarantee for anything.
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag
Super MKI
MKI
Rafale

The old MKIs that are to be upgraded to Super MKI are behind the Rafale and have old radars. The MKIs that have been coming out fresh from the factories since 3 years are all better than Rafale, at least in air to air because of the massive modernization the radar went through apart from other advances we know nothing about.

Dog fights, Rafale should be better than the MKI because of higher T/W. But that's no guarantee for anything.
The contract for 140 sukhois were signed back in 2000. Can any advancement in radar after the signing of contract make its way into the newer MKIs? Doesn't seem very plausible.
 

Austin

New Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
852
Likes
363
He isn't talking about differences between R-77M and RVV-SD. He's talking about R-77M and 180-PD which seems to be an entirely different missile.
Yes i am aware of that , I mentioned those details since the specs of RVV-SD is known and is there on their website , R-77M and 180-PD is more modern development . The russians are keeping a tight wrap on PAK-FA A2A Missile development so i think we will have to wait may be until MAKS 2013 or 2015 we will get clear details.

This range is okay. 110-140Km is quite like what's quoted for Aim-120C7. 110Km range at cruising speed at high altitude.
RVV-SD has range of 110 Km for R-77M it will be 140 km. Again a lot depends on the flight profile and how the target is co-operative/non-cooperative.

That is not correct. There are two flight profiles for Meteor. At its longest range, the Meteor will function the same as other conventional missiles. That's because it needs to retain as much fuel as possible in order to reach its max range.

At shorter ranges, the seeker determines the distance and adjusts the speed accordingly. So at shorter ranges, the missile will pump in more juice and accelerate faster than conventional missiles. Here it starts burning fuel in a more efficient manner, meaning by the time it reaches the target the fuel will be nearly empty, unlike on conventional missiles.
Do you have any thing from MBDA on it , The 100 Km effective range is for non-cooperative targests that knows its under attacks and tries to kinimetically and electronically defeat it.

Ramjets are not effecient at high altitudes where solid fuels are they are good at medium altitudes at 15 - 18 km
 

WMD

New Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2013
Messages
624
Likes
794
there's a lot of talk abt Super Sukhois but at present i'm a little skeptical regarding it,
no doubt MKIs will b upgraded in the future but up to what extent remains as question
no matter what u do u can't make MKIs into a 5th gen fighter,
with the big rcs of MKIs u can at best reduce it to the level of Su-35S
though the zhuk-AE radar is an AESA radar IMO its less capable to Su-35BM radar Irbis-E
but i suppose it'll b up-scaled looking at the big nose of MKIs
there's also a possibility that SS will b equipped with PAK FA radar
supercruise is out of the picture unless they also use a diff. engine having more thrust
so much is yet to b seen abt the so called super sukhois which IMO will just be an upgradation (which is done in every fighters life-cycle) without having anything really super abt it.
 
Last edited:

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
The contract for 140 sukhois were signed back in 2000. Can any advancement in radar after the signing of contract make its way into the newer MKIs? Doesn't seem very plausible.
Of course it can. Such big deals are not just one contract. They are a multitude of contracts signed with hundreds of vendors.
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag
Of course it can. Such big deals are not just one contract. They are a multitude of contracts signed with hundreds of vendors.
But since HAL is manufacturing all major components of MKI at home now with ToT, any advancement will require further ToT from the Russians. How do you account for that?
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
RVV-SD has range of 110 Km for R-77M it will be 140 km. Again a lot depends on the flight profile and how the target is co-operative/non-cooperative.
110-140Km is not an exact measure without knowing under what conditions they were fired in. In the passage you quoted he mentions 110-140Km. That could mean 110Km fired at subsonic speed while 140Km may be range fired at a particular supersonic speed. This matches with the claims for C7 and you can say even RVV-SD.

Do you have any thing from MBDA on it , The 100 Km effective range is for non-cooperative targests that knows its under attacks and tries to kinimetically and electronically defeat it.
The 100Km range is quite like the claim for C7 or RVV-SD. It is impossible for a missile to defeat a maneuvering target at it's maximum range. Theoretically possible, practically impossible.

There was an article about it. Let me get back to you on that.

Ramjets are not effecient at high altitudes where solid fuels are they are good at medium altitudes at 15 - 18 km
Not enough air.
 

p2prada

New Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,017
But since HAL is manufacturing all major components of MKI at home now with ToT, any advancement will require further ToT from the Russians. How do you account for that?
Contracts over contracts. IAF will sign a contract with Dassault for Rafale and then Dassault will choose vendors based on MoDs choice and then signs another contract with those home grown vendors like Reliance or HAL. That's what they were trying to do with Rafale and Reliance.

Contracts will have room for upgrade requirements as was the case with Bars.
 

Defcon 1

New Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2011
Messages
2,195
Likes
1,842
Country flag
Contracts over contracts. IAF will sign a contract with Dassault for Rafale and then Dassault will choose vendors based on MoDs choice and then signs another contract with those home grown vendors like Reliance or HAL. That's what they were trying to do with Rafale and Reliance.

Contracts will have room for upgrade requirements as was the case with Bars.
Yes, but once that contract is signed with the vendors, and Dassault makes an advancement after that, why will they be willing to give it to us? They are not under any legal boundation to do so. Moreover, that would require continuous ToT till MKI production carries on, which should slow down the MKI production rate as well.
 
Last edited:

Articles

Top