The thing is nobody trust the numbers Chinese give for missiles, radars or anything.
I don’t know what revolutionary changes will be made in the future, but AL31, RD33, WS10, and J79 are all powered by the upper receiver. F16, su27, su30, and radars all have independent power supply systems, just behind the radar.
Look for the photos of su27 yourself, compare the F14 with the same central lifting body , because the N001 radar is too heavy and too large, the landing gear of the su27 is moved backwards, when it comes to su30, you have to raise the body to add a second seat. This also leads to increased aircraft drag and reduced range, which has nothing to do with the weight of the nose
all engines generate electricity, and you are stubburn trying to prove J-10 will outperform Su-30 in radar range, that is no possible, simply by volume less volume less batteries
I did not say that the J10 radar is better than the su30, I just tell you that the engine thrust has nothing to do with the aircraft's power generation
Engineers built the first generation of GE aeroderivatives called LM100 from a helicopter engine in the late 1950s. The next machine, the LM1500, had inside components from GE’s first supersonic engine — the J79 — and generated more than 10,000 kilowatts. GE Power kept improving on the design, building aeroderivatives from the CF6 engine, which powers Air Force One and many other Boeing 747s, as well the F404 engine used by F/A-18 Hornet and F-117 Nighthawk military jets. Aeroderivatives based on these engines generate electricity in remote corners of the world and also power the world’s fastest passenger ferry.
If you say that China’s data are all fake, then I have nothing to say, JF17 radar and LCA radar have at least the same performance. From this we can see the level of Chinese radar.
I know that gas turbines are divided into aeroderivatives and industrial engines. After that, does it have any relationship with the electrical energy of the aircraft?
If the bigger the aircraft, the better the radar, then why did su27 lose to Gripen at BVR
the answer is easy, depends in the radar not on the electricity generated.
???
F404 is the engine powering F-18
One is an inverted Caserengen antenna, the other is a pulse Doppler antenna,
All the power on a fighter come from the engine(s).
If I remember correctly, the F110 is the YF23 engine. This technology is still a long time away from practicality.F404 is the engine powering F-18
In 2016, GE successfully extracted power from jet engines to generate electricity for future aircraft requirements. With help from NASA and the USAF, GE demonstrated a “dual-spool” extraction of one megawatt of power from a F110 fighter engine by pulling 250 kilowatts from the engine’s high-pressure turbine and 750 kilowatts from the low-pressure turbine.
You are right.
The emergency power unit (EPU) for the General Dynamics F-16 “Fighting Falcon” aircraft provides electrical and hydraulic power in the event of main engine generator or hydraulic pump failure or an engine-out condition. The unit is powered by main engine bleed air, or by the decomposition products of H-70 fuel (a hydrazine-water mixture), or a combination of both. This paper describes the emergency power unit and discusses the use of H-70 on the flight line
asmedigitalcollection.asme.org
No. F110 is the other engine of F16 and F15, with F100.
Well, I remembered it wrong,
Again Chinese stat for KJ7?If you say that China’s data are all fake, then I have nothing to say, JF17 radar and LCA radar have at least the same performance. From this we can see the level of Chinese radar.
JF-17 Avionics | JF-17 Thunder
Details on JF-17 Radar, Cockpit, Electronic Warfare, MAWS, RWR and all the other specificsjf-17.com
