I have posted about tiered defence on DFILast Post on this. Have u heard tiered air defence. S400 is outermost layer. Read man. And u are the one stuck on US not me. So no fan boy.
Please quote such military expertsU won't agree on S400 although majority defence experts do. Fine. T14 Armata.
Last one for sure. Didn't wanted to respond but that tick. Ur Air defence umbrella have some underdevelopment trials, not inducted and in test products.I have posted about tiered defence on DFI
Infact india has better tiered defence than
Spyder+OR SAM+Akash NG
With MR SAM and LR SAM and AAD.
Top tier is PDV ,AD1 and AD2 and PDV2
And Upgraded LR SAM
And S-100 series hadn't been.combat tested in last 3 decadesLast one for sure. Didn't wanted to respond but that tick. Ur Air defence umbrella have some underdevelopment trials, not inducted and in test products.
Your hypothesis is flawed in assessing the hardware given that these wars have been fought against most countries that were under sanctions with no training. Iraq or Libya cannot be used as test case to assess so called superiority of the system.IAF always regarded its own aircraft to be upgraded with Mixture of both
That is why Su-30 is MKI not SU-30SM
IAF is using Combinations of Western and indian avionics in its planes since decades now
That is why we use combinations of French, Israelis ,Indian avionics
F-16 that Pakistan use is technolocally at par with Indian one accept having better radar
Iaf upgrade it with HMDS with better IR CCM
And Israelis EW
Major factor which contributed was Training & experience that is what makes you perfect
Probably you have not heard about Cope india exercises that IAF do with US regularly since 15 years
But Even in that Sense its anomaly
Such anomalies happend many times in war
But rare like shooting down of F117
Like Turkish F-16 was shot by mere MANAPAD in Syria
Read about battle of longewala
How 120 Indian soldiers pitted against
2 armoured battalions of Pakistan army +
Combat is uncertain territory
But Western nations equipments proved its worth by far over Russians every time.
Why should we by f-35 when we can have almost 80 % of technology to create are own fighterYour hypothesis is flawed in assessing the hardware given that these wars have been fought against most countries that were under sanctions with no training. Iraq or Libya cannot be used as test case to assess so called superiority of the system.
Western tech is over engineered expensive for Indians. If you buy a squadron f 35 unit price is Dan high add to that training cost plus opex basically we will be bankrupt even before fighting.
I could have explained the whole thing nicely if you would have asked with an open mind. But it seems you are too hell bent on the single line of thought. So I don't seen any point of wasting my time trying to bang my head on a wall.Haan haan hum ko bhi batao what is it that causes Su30MKI to have magically 1/3rd return of a Su27 despite having elements such as a way bigger glass canopy that exposes lot more cockpit to radar (remember Su30 doesn't have any ITO-coated canopies like F-22 does) and also uses canards, which any radar with good NCTR library can easily recognize as a target characteristic, even if rcs picture on rest of aircraft wasn't available to a good degree.
And development of airframe that went on to be Su30 happened pretty much concurrently with development of Su27UB (operational conversion trainer for Su27), so one can't even make the argument that MKI airframe incorporated extensive use of composites or anything (as one could say wrt Su35 airframe that came much later).
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|The Amazing Flanker | Exclusive Video | Su-30MKI||Indian Air Force||2|
|M2000 and F-16 are no match to Su-30MKI : IAF Sukhoi Su-30 ‘Flanker’ Pilot||Indian Air Force||27|
|UFO near IB, IAF scrambles Sukhoi-30MKI||Indian Air Force||16|
|Third IAF Sukhoi-30MKI goes down near Pune today afternoon, both pilots safe!||Indian Air Force||107|