Yes soon the time will come that there is a hypersonic internal variant over an external carry of the F-35.
Post when they are changed to the GaN...
Like I did just now?
*Soon
if only LM did this
That depends on who is claimingif only LM did this
the lockshill troll i am talking to of course.
Can you quit pretending to be retarded and post an up to date news source like I just did?
Did I even claimed that f35 carries a cruise missiles inside..
You dont get it do you? I am the one that claimed hypersonic air to ground missile configurations. I posted GaAS based radars but that was back in 2009 while I say there were changes done or will be done later on the aircraft because the same thing has happened to another certain aircraft I have already talked about here.
Such corner reflectors are used for the ground mapping,their is a difference bw Mapping and target search,in the mapping each returning wave's data is stored and then overlapped to present a picture,your other picture is the result of that,if you use the same technique for aerial target detection,not only it will be time consuming but will not be able to paint any target at all since with each and each changing position the map will be filled with massive noises and will present each target at hundreds of location.....Rafale has locked F22 in its HUD,it hasn't used its radar or IRST on the nose,the fight was solely gun vs gun....
Did I denied the presence of hypersonic missile in the Russian programs..No...Russia is manufacturing GaAs based electronics since 80s,infact it was the first to use GaAs in the radars after introducing the PESA radar...all of its electronics even today use GaAs...their development in GaN is not well know but people busy on jumping on GaN being used by Russia in the defence....
You seriously need to work on the comprehension skills before jumping on any thing.....Another incoherent rant
Firstly Russia does use domestic airlines. Secondly you gave no explanation as to why China and its superior industries uses the SU-35 and S-400, you just ranted about “old acquisitions” and vague statements such as “Chinese reason to buy su35 is well known to the others”
You earlier ranted about Russia buying equipment from the US and China but you refuse to address why the US uses Russian engines and aircraft if Russia is so backwards.
You kept asking for Russian AESA radars with GaN, I posted various Russian AESA radars you started deflecting, ‘oh they are ground based’, or ‘they are sea based’, bla, bla, bla. Then you started asking “how many of them are air horned fire control...”
Nothing I post is good enough for you, you find every excuse to ignore, deflect, or reject every type of radar I provide.
Comprehension is surely not your cup of tea, you yourself use the sample of SAR image from the satellite to map a target sums up your state of mindAre you that slow? All HUDs are slaved to radars, even gun modes on HUDs measure distance and vector to help the pilot point the gun and pull the trigger. What do you think those funnels are? What do you think gives pilots a gun firing solution? What do you think those triangles and boxes?
You can clearly see the Rafale track and lock the on to the F-22.
You are obviously a science denier, you clearly lose debates and twist physics and then start making moronic attacks on the methods of measuring like ‘SAR is used to map floods’
.....proving physics lol,in that graph show us which is the incident wave.....I'm sure you don't even know what single bouncing scattering centers and coupling scattering centers are in the polyhedral geometry......
So all this point your perception on this whole mess was F22 and F35 can't be detected
........comprehension skills is surely not your cup of tea
So all this point your perception on this whole mess was F22 and F35 can't be detected
