Sukhoi PAK FA

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
What did I just read? With all do respect, you literally make no sense and are incoherent. The only thing I understood was that Russia has limited cruise missiles compared to other weapons. Which Russia still has massive amounts of weaponry compared to most countries and can mass produce anything. So your argument is a none argument, Russia can produce 1000 cruise missiles if it wanted.

Yes it’s a website where people can share and debate, but how quickly you forget how you were threatening me and calling me names. I presented to you what the MOD presented, I really could care less weather you think the SU-57 used weapons in Syria or not.

Yes and what is your point? How does manufacturing GaN and testing it in various industries a bad thing? You claimed Russia can not manufacture GaN and now you shifted the topic criticizing where Russia uses its GaN.
This is an asinine argument, firstly US companies use Russian engines, aircraft and other equipment. Also by your token ask the US and many other countries why they import and uses so much chinese equipment. Chinese goods are mostly purchased because the prices are so cheap it’s no different for Russia.
Yes it does, the S-400 uses mostly Russian made electronics. Almost anybody can produce large missiles like the S-400 with similar range but producing a highly integrated air defense system, that can operate in heavy electronic warfare environments and accurately detect and shoot down hostile targets is something else altogether. Lets forget the S-400, China recently purchased SU-35s and other weapons, why China would need all those weapons when Russia sucks in the semiconductors industry and China is so much better?

Many of the radars I posted were airborne ones, there was some ground/sea radars I posted which I acknowledge but do notice how you are once again shifting the the goal posts. What do you think Russian radars use in place of GaN? Maybe a rat on a wheel? :lol:

You mean Israeli radars? Also it’s pretty ironic that the Astra uses some Russian electrics and India appears to have been using or testing Russian jammers this year on SU-30mkis. Why India uses Russian electrics if India is so advanced? Why doesn’t India use its stellar GaN industry to make an S-400 equivalent?
Yes russians can produce 1000snds of cruise missiles why not 10000snds why they use dumb bombs in the whole spectrum of operations in syria,and yes I'm exciting to know how will they bear the cost of producing them in mass,a supersonic cruise missile costs around a million US dollars.....
Go and read your stupid stuff, you'll find who started nitpicking.....
I'm sure comprehension is a problem related to you,go read my stuff again when I was responding to the other guy...limited production in the labs doesn't mean one can reciprocate that in the industries for all the moment I'm still asking where does Russia manufactures GaN in mass,I'm not intrested in what ever is in testings......
You seriously have comprehension problem and no one is going to solve that but your self,with chinese electronics I was referring to why Russians don't use Russia designed and developed electronics,chinese mobiles use SOC designed by the Americans. By the way when will russia replace expensive Airbus with the cheap Russian alternative....
Chinese reason to buy su35 is well known to the others,su35 itself uses electronics which were designed 15 years ago,when India was signing Su30 deal,russians were already testing a more powerful alternative.
"Shifting goal post,let me show the screenshot and who has continuously jumping from one point it other" seems like someone's whole argument is based on lies.....and yes russians themselves claim that they use GaA based radars and not the GaN.....
Screenshot_2020-08-08-18-50-50-86.jpg

Screenshot_2020-08-08-18-51-19-76.jpg

By the way how many of them are air horned fire control....
Screenshot_2020-08-08-18-47-12-17.jpg

No I mean indian radar,such as Battlefield surveillance radar, radars for the Qrsam,ARUDHRA/Anuradha and not to mention the radar on the BMD system and survillance ship which uses GaN based L-S band modules manufactured by BEL...
Indian S400 buy is based on the older acquisition program when s400 itself came into existence,don't worry more about that,it will be the last time india inducts such system of the class,only five regiments we are buying when the requirement is more than that....
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
There is no self praising I was just explaining obtuse corner reflectors. I have proven my arguments with providing scientific data that measured obtuse corner reflectors that measured RCS using monostatic radars.


The argument you are trying to make is that in real life no radar will track an aircraft and its corner reflectors because aircraft move. In other words you believe the line of sight (LOS) between receiver and transmitter is too brief.

The problem is that the Rafale tracked the F-22 for long periods of time in close dogfights. Part of it was corner reflectors, part of it was the top side of the F-22 presenting perfect 90 degree angles and part of it was Rafale pointing its radar into the F-22 engines (yes in real life it’s unlikely the Rafale will get that close to an F-22? But this is about radar LOS.


You're then proving your idiocy this whole time,your scientific data is used for the land mapping and helps well in the disastrous condition, specially helpful in flood and earthquake ,your whole argument was based on detection of the certain irrespective of the requirement,you tried so without taking the account of the discussion being made on the fighter aircrafts and combat....and then your freakin comprehension skills...no where I meant that " in real life no radar will track an aircraft and it's corner reflectors because the aircraft moves".....work on that first before jumping...
Get a brief of that dogfight,It was guns only mock in which F22 had better scores than the Rafale ...in the whole video,Rafale didn't take the missile shot despite getting the tone..,
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
I got nothing much against that guy but when I had created a photonic integrated circuit thread back at key aero on august 9.





There were like 20+ posts after that thread(on that same day) was made in hopes he can bury it on the next page. He did admit to having a user account called mig-31bm. But it sucks because I remember there was a user named Moon_light that had a very similar thread regarding Israeli air launched ballistic missiles which of course he himself posted on other forums but I cannot find that thread either on that forum, and of course most of my arguments with Moon_light had a similar style to his. And of course having admins browse these kinds of threads as well. If there is a good archive web source that goes way back to threads that were also deleted in the past let me know or any user inform me. The admins and this guy seem to be concerned about those kinds of threads so it is not out of the questions that there can be government lapdogs larping as users which would make sense because military forums attract military personnel that can disclose classified information.




“A small-sized inboard fuselage hypersonic missile was developed for the Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57, a prototype of ammunition was created. This was reported on Sunday by TASS sources in the military-industrial complex.

"The enterprises of the Russian military-industrial complex have created a prototype of a small-sized air-to-surface hypersonic missile for intra-fuselable deployment on a Su-57 fighter," said one of the agency’s interlocutors.

Another source confirmed the creation of the prototype and clarified that "the rocket has not yet been tested with the carrier aircraft." The interlocutors did not disclose the characteristics of the latest ammunition.”

2nd version of su-57 is getting new weapons so lets see if that is one of them.
The day it is spotted with the su57,prove the point then....
 

panzerfeist1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
78
Likes
88
Country flag
"Shifting goal post,let me show the screenshot and who has continuously jumping from one point it other" seems like someone's whole argument is based on lies.....and yes russians themselves claim that they use GaA based radars and not the GaN.....

“On-board radio electronic equipment is being improved. Now the transmission power of the transceiver module of the active phased array antenna is 5–7 watts. After switching to the use of gallium nitride in microwave transmitters, the power can increase to 20 watts. Accordingly, the performance parameters of the radar will improve, and its dimensions will decrease.”
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag

“On-board radio electronic equipment is being improved. Now the transmission power of the transceiver module of the active phased array antenna is 5–7 watts. After switching to the use of gallium nitride in microwave transmitters, the power can increase to 20 watts. Accordingly, the performance parameters of the radar will improve, and its dimensions will decrease.”
Post when they are changed to the GaN...
 

Neptune

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
551
Likes
1,920
Country flag
You're then proving your idiocy this whole time,your scientific data is used for the land mapping and helps well in the disastrous condition, specially helpful in flood and earthquake ,your whole argument was based on detection of the certain irrespective of the requirement,you tried so without taking the account of the discussion being made on the fighter aircrafts and combat....and then your freakin comprehension skills...no where I meant that " in real life no radar will track an aircraft and it's corner reflectors because the aircraft moves".....work on that first before jumping...
Get a brief of that dogfight,It was guns only mock in which F22 had better scores than the Rafale ...in the whole video,Rafale didn't take the missile shot despite getting the tone..,

You are obviously not getting it are you? SAR just maps images we are not talking about floods. We are talking measuring a corner reflector for illustration purposes. While you are deflecting and ranting about SAR while ignoring the physics of corner reflectors I posted.

Next thing is you are ignoring that video I posted of a Rafale tracking an F-22 for long periods of time, corner reflectors and even 90 degrees angles from aircraft can be tracked for somewhat long periods of time.
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
the lockshill troll i am talking to of course.



Can you quit pretending to be retarded and post an up to date news source like I just did?
Did I even claimed that f35 carries a cruise missiles inside..
Based on what,it's not me but you people are claiming that Russian radars are based on GaN transistors,you yourself posted about GaAs based radars which is known to everyone....
 

panzerfeist1

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2020
Messages
78
Likes
88
Country flag
Did I even claimed that f35 carries a cruise missiles inside..
Based on what,it's not me but you people are claiming that Russian radars are based on GaN transistors,you yourself posted about GaAs based radars which is known to everyone....
You dont get it do you? I am the one that claimed hypersonic air to ground missile configurations. I posted GaAS based radars but that was back in 2009 while I say there were changes done or will be done later on the aircraft because the same thing has happened to another certain aircraft I have already talked about here.
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
You are obviously not getting it are you? SAR just maps images we are not talking about floods. We are talking measuring a corner reflector for illustration purposes. While you are deflecting and ranting about SAR while ignoring the physics of corner reflectors I posted.

Next thing is you are ignoring that video I posted of a Rafale tracking an F-22 for long periods of time, corner reflectors and even 90 degrees angles from aircraft can be tracked for somewhat long periods of time.
Such corner reflectors are used for the ground mapping,their is a difference bw Mapping and target search,in the mapping each returning wave's data is stored and then overlapped to present a picture,your other picture is the result of that,if you use the same technique for aerial target detection,not only it will be time consuming but will not be able to paint any target at all since with each and each changing position the map will be filled with massive noises and will present each target at hundreds of location.....Rafale has locked F22 in its HUD,it hasn't used its radar or IRST on the nose,the fight was solely gun vs gun....
 

Neptune

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
551
Likes
1,920
Country flag
Yes russians can produce 1000snds of cruise missiles why not 10000snds why they use dumb bombs in the whole spectrum of operations in syria,and yes I'm exciting to know how will they bear the cost of producing them in mass,a supersonic cruise missile costs around a million US dollars.....
Go and read your stupid stuff, you'll find who started nitpicking.....
I'm sure comprehension is a problem related to you,go read my stuff again when I was responding to the other guy...limited production in the labs doesn't mean one can reciprocate that in the industries for all the moment I'm still asking where does Russia manufactures GaN in mass,I'm not intrested in what ever is in testings......
You seriously have comprehension problem and no one is going to solve that but your self,with chinese electronics I was referring to why Russians don't use Russia designed and developed electronics,chinese mobiles use SOC designed by the Americans. By the way when will russia replace expensive Airbus with the cheap Russian alternative....
Chinese reason to buy su35 is well known to the others,su35 itself uses electronics which were designed 15 years ago,when India was signing Su30 deal,russians were already testing a more powerful alternative.
"Shifting goal post,let me show the screenshot and who has continuously jumping from one point it other" seems like someone's whole argument is based on lies.....and yes russians themselves claim that they use GaA based radars and not the GaN.....
View attachment 55896
View attachment 55897
By the way how many of them are air horned fire control....
View attachment 55898
No I mean indian radar,such as Battlefield surveillance radar, radars for the Qrsam,ARUDHRA/Anuradha and not to mention the radar on the BMD system and survillance ship which uses GaN based L-S band modules manufactured by BEL...
Indian S400 buy is based on the older acquisition program when s400 itself came into existence,don't worry more about that,it will be the last time india inducts such system of the class,only five regiments we are buying when the requirement is more than that....

Another incoherent rant :lol:

Firstly Russia does use domestic airlines. Secondly you gave no explanation as to why China and its superior industries uses the SU-35 and S-400, you just ranted about “old acquisitions” and vague statements such as “Chinese reason to buy su35 is well known to the others”

You earlier ranted about Russia buying equipment from the US and China but you refuse to address why the US uses Russian engines and aircraft if Russia is so backwards.

You kept asking for Russian AESA radars with GaN, I posted various Russian AESA radars you started deflecting, ‘oh they are ground based’, or ‘they are sea based’, bla, bla, bla. Then you started asking “how many of them are air horned fire control...”

Nothing I post is good enough for you, you find every excuse to ignore, deflect, or reject every type of radar I provide.
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
You dont get it do you? I am the one that claimed hypersonic air to ground missile configurations. I posted GaAS based radars but that was back in 2009 while I say there were changes done or will be done later on the aircraft because the same thing has happened to another certain aircraft I have already talked about here.
Did I denied the presence of hypersonic missile in the Russian programs..No...Russia is manufacturing GaAs based electronics since 80s,infact it was the first to use GaAs in the radars after introducing the PESA radar...all of its electronics even today use GaAs...their development in GaN is not well know but people busy on jumping on GaN being used by Russia in the defence....
 

Steven Rogers

NaPakiRoaster
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,410
Likes
1,922
Country flag
Another incoherent rant :lol:

Firstly Russia does use domestic airlines. Secondly you gave no explanation as to why China and its superior industries uses the SU-35 and S-400, you just ranted about “old acquisitions” and vague statements such as “Chinese reason to buy su35 is well known to the others”

You earlier ranted about Russia buying equipment from the US and China but you refuse to address why the US uses Russian engines and aircraft if Russia is so backwards.

You kept asking for Russian AESA radars with GaN, I posted various Russian AESA radars you started deflecting, ‘oh they are ground based’, or ‘they are sea based’, bla, bla, bla. Then you started asking “how many of them are air horned fire control...”

Nothing I post is good enough for you, you find every excuse to ignore, deflect, or reject every type of radar I provide.
You seriously need to work on the comprehension skills before jumping on any thing.....
 

Neptune

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2019
Messages
551
Likes
1,920
Country flag
Such corner reflectors are used for the ground mapping,their is a difference bw Mapping and target search,in the mapping each returning wave's data is stored and then overlapped to present a picture,your other picture is the result of that,if you use the same technique for aerial target detection,not only it will be time consuming but will not be able to paint any target at all since with each and each changing position the map will be filled with massive noises and will present each target at hundreds of location.....Rafale has locked F22 in its HUD,it hasn't used its radar or IRST on the nose,the fight was solely gun vs gun....

Are you that slow? All HUDs are slaved to radars, even gun modes on HUDs measure distance and vector to help the pilot point the gun and pull the trigger. What do you think those funnels are? What do you think gives pilots a gun firing solution? What do you think those triangles and boxes?

You can clearly see the Rafale track and lock the on to the F-22.


You are obviously a science denier, you clearly lose debates and twist physics and then start making moronic attacks on the methods of measuring like ‘SAR is used to map floods’ :lol:
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top