No, INSAS Mag only fits Insas ..Kunal, can stanag magazines be used in INSAS?
Don't worry just like mac10 it will have its most actions in box office rather than actual battle fields. A double barell auto rifle firing 7.62 and 5.56 ammo sounds bull shitCan't imagine the recoil of this thing...
These type butt stocks which are straight in top contributes much to the stability while firing than the ones which are slant in the top portion like regular kalashnikov buttstocks as while firing the butt stock will try to jump up and the ones with straight cut tops will make this jumping reduce drastically.that's why Eugene stoner while designing M16 made a straight butt stock unlike that of M14
Is the weapon currently in the prodn line or is undergoing evaluation tests? Iam asking about beretta not about f-insas.how is its performance compared to those of cz805 and scar?Beretta ARX160 A2 5.56x45mm assault rifle
A variant of this can be out FINSAS rifle..
All these New generation Rifles are more or less same, SCAR is little better..Is the weapon currently in the prodn line or is undergoing evaluation tests? Iam asking about beretta not about f-insas.how is its performance compared to those of cz805 and scar?
I dont believe there is anything like that, Those are pure commercial words i assure you..These type butt stocks which are straight in top contributes much to the stability while firing than the ones which are slant in the top portion like regular kalashnikov buttstocks as while firing the butt stock will try to jump up and the ones with straight cut tops will make this jumping reduce drastically.that's why Eugene stoner while designing M16 made a straight butt stock unlike that of M14
Photo 1 – a close-up of the finished conversion. The buffer tube was cut so that when the CTR is fully collapsed, there is very little gap between stock and folding mechanism. Not only did this keep the length to absolute minimum with the stock collapsed, but IMO created a clean look too.
Photo 2 – Top view. The top of the CTR is wider and more rounded, providing a comfortable cheek weld.
Photo 3 – Stock folded, which works out fine with no optic attached to the rail.
Photo 4 – Close-up, right side.
This photo illustrates a few reasons for my decision to do the conversion; (1) I attained a shorter pull, even with the Magpul recoil pad installed; (2) the height of the CTR stock is better suited for the optics I use; (3) I found the way the original stock protrudes on the bottom of the butt end was very uncomfortable. In comparison, the CTR tapers forward at the bottom, which I find far more comfortable.
Seen from the other side. The way the butt on the CTR stock angles forward on the bottom, in combination with its much larger contact area with the shoulder and recoil pad made a HUGE difference to me. The rifle is now truly a pleasure to shoot!
The difference in butt size between the two stocks.
Kunal my post was based on a nat geo vedio about machine guns which illustrates buttstocks like those of M14 etc are more prone to jump up than that of M16 due to the design of buttI dont believe there is anything like that, Those are pure commercial words i assure you..
Not Long Ago, I posted on Butt of the Rifle, Special Magpul once which i think are good and have practical means on firing range or Field situation..
I know, Saw that long time back there is nothing such factor in real firing..Kunal my post was based on a nat geo vedio about machine guns which illustrates buttstocks like those of M14 etc are more prone to jump up than that of M16 due to the design of butt
kunal sir i think arx 160 is the best next gen ar available in the market today, its got some cool features like reversible charging handle, quick change barrel, ambi ejection but i dont think its battle provenBeretta ARX160 A2 5.56x45mm assault rifle
A variant of this can be out FINSAS rifle..
i waiting to see AK12 in action.the ever reliable kalashnikov weapon with new gen addons will surely pose a great challenge to this toy looking oneskunal sir i think arx 160 is the best next gen ar available in the market today, its got some cool features like reversible charging handle, quick change barrel, ambi ejection but i dont think its battle proven
This is not something really new and not avaiable for other AR's. I know it might sounds not fair, but the only, really new features are shown only in case of Polish MSBS-5,56 family of modular small arms for infantry. Where the standard AR can be quickly converted to the bullpup AR in case of need, and both standard and bullpup use common parts. So there are many options for armed forces, and they can choose both standard and bullpup design to fulfill their needs, while reducing costs thanks to the common components and in fact using on AR just in two configurations. Also there was anounced that MSBS-7,62 will also be designed.kunal sir i think arx 160 is the best next gen ar available in the market today, its got some cool features like reversible charging handle, quick change barrel, ambi ejection but i dont think its battle proven
It will be battle proven once in service, Though i hope evaluation should be tuff so that deficiency can be corrected before it enter into service..kunal sir i think arx 160 is the best next gen ar available in the market today, its got some cool features like reversible charging handle, quick change barrel, ambi ejection but i dont think its battle proven
Rahul you are little late, I was informed by a OFB official in expo that Only Berrata have what IA needs..Lets wait for ARDE's F-INSAS rifle to appear before we jump on options. Beretta, AK, Colt ... option in hundreds but whats the point in flushing millions to foreign dump again
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
W | Russia to supply air defence system and small arms to Pakistan | Pakistan | 3 | |
Gun memes | General Multimedia | 83 | ||
Israeli-Indian JV to make small arms in private sector | Defence & Strategy | 15 | ||
India identifying requirement for small arms fire detection system | Indian Army | 6 |