Skyroot Aerospace - Updates & Activities

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,461
Country flag
Circulation and pressure might have to be more governed in staged combustion as compared to gas generators (that explains why LVM3 CE-20 is more reliable than GSLV CE-7.5). Wondering what will happen to SCE-200.
SCE-200 is even more complicated than CE-7.5 . SCE-200 uses oxidiser rich cycle while CE-7.5 uses fuel rich cycle..... oxidiser rich cycles are more notorious than fuel rich ones...they have to be extra careful with SCE-200
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,410
Likes
56,890
Country flag
SCE-200 is even more complicated than CE-7.5 . SCE-200 uses oxidiser rich cycle while CE-7.5 uses fuel rich cycle..... oxidiser rich cycles are more notorious than fuel rich ones...they have to be extra careful with SCE-200
Given what happened to CE-7.5 and eventually GSLV, I actually expect delays and possibly even program scrapping for failures of SCE-200. Chinese built a smaller YF-100 and chose to cluster them.

While SCE-200 is far bigger, comparable to NASA's RS-25. Complexity and chance of failurr will be certainly higher than Chinese engines.
 

Vamsi

New Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2020
Messages
4,858
Likes
29,461
Country flag
Given what happened to CE-7.5 and eventually GSLV, I actually expect delays and possibly even program scrapping for failures of SCE-200. Chinese built a smaller YF-100 and chose to cluster them.

While SCE-200 is far bigger, comparable to NASA's RS-25. Complexity and chance of failurr will be certainly higher than Chinese engines.
both YF-100 & SCE-200 belong to same family, both are derivates of RD-120 in one way or another....failure of CE-7.5 during GSLV D3 flight is due to the lack of high altitude test facility at that time, while the recent failure is because of some pressure drop,which is easily rectified.But yes, they have to be very careful with SCE-200
 

Alamarathan

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2022
Messages
1,217
Likes
4,751
Country flag
SCE-200 is even more complicated than CE-7.5 . SCE-200 uses oxidiser rich cycle while CE-7.5 uses fuel rich cycle..... oxidiser rich cycles are more notorious than fuel rich ones...they have to be extra careful with SCE-200
Is it safe to say fuel rich rockets like CE-7.5 are more suitable for reusable launch vehicles?
 

Abdus Salem killed

New Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2021
Messages
4,103
Likes
15,760
SCE-200 is even more complicated than CE-7.5 . SCE-200 uses oxidiser rich cycle while CE-7.5 uses fuel rich cycle..... oxidiser rich cycles are more notorious than fuel rich ones...they have to be extra careful with SCE-200
Is thier any greater tech than semi cryo engines in space launch vehicle?
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top