NeXoft007
New Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2017
- Messages
- 1,680
- Likes
- 13,509
More like a successoris this a follow on to the gotland class
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine
____________________
More like a successoris this a follow on to the gotland class
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gotland-class_submarine
The post above you states that Japan and Spain have dropped out of the deal. So it's down to France, Germany, Russia and Sweden.Should be a toss up between Japanese and German firms for this one. Germans gave us good ToT with the HDW deal. Japanese are keen to bag this one after the surprising and the fixed loss to DCNS in Australia. I think Soryu would be good for us, probably the most advanced submarine of this class out there.
We need to negotiate hard and extract maximum we can get out of this.
Japan - They are less interested in going by regular RFIs and RFPs for their Soryus. Would prefer a G2G approach and 'assemble in India' for higher numbers.The post above you states that Japan and Spain have dropped out of the deal. So it's down to France, Germany, Russia and Sweden.
What is special about Soryu is its use of Li-Ion batteries. What is dangerous about it is that they are just commercial grade when they need to be solid state so they don't catch fire.How capable is the SORYU in comparision to others?
Will a G2G deal woth Japan more beneficial in long term?
Only Navy can answer that question.Russian subs usually used 533 and 650mm tubes if I remember well. So why not integrate bigger tubes on future indian subs?
Currently none of the subs insoryu class has LIB.What is special about Soryu is its use of Li-Ion batteries. What is dangerous about it is that they are just commercial grade when they need to be solid state so they don't catch fire.
Indeed, the only one is under construction and will not see IOC until 2020. When it goes to trials it will be interesting to see how many fires it can start.Currently none of the subs insoryu class has LIB.
The french proposal for Australian bid is without AIP. So AIP or stirling or... is not the only answer for an oceanic sub.The Japanese categorically stated that the reason for transition to LIB instead of the Stirling AIP was two-fold:
- Better sustained performance
- Improved safety of the LIB option over the Stirling
Now if they were planning to use commercial grade batteries (I laugh at this statement) then you must think how bad Stirling AIP must be that fire-prone LIB is still considered "safer"
The real reason why they don't... massive debt and start up costs of MIC infrastructure. It is not cheap to play this game.Japs should go nuke if they don't want to be the salami between the USA and chinland.
They have the tech and the industry to produce a viable and powerful military machinery which ain't just a mere US puppet.
Japan submarines patrol area which is close to the shore line and do not go very far from their bases. They do not require a nuclear submarineJaps should go nuke if they don't want to be the salami between the USA and chinland.
They have the tech and the industry to produce a viable and powerful military machinery which ain't just a mere US puppet.
He is asking for nuke bombs.Japan submarines patrol area which is close to the shore line and do not go very far from their bases. They do not require a nuclear submarine
The public is against the nukes, just look when Abe got rid of article 9, the public backlash was huge. For a nuke program it will be massiveHe is asking for nuke bombs.
_____________________________________
Well Japan must ditch it's pacifist ideology if it seriously wants to confront china.The public is against the nukes, just look when Abe got rid of article 9, the public backlash was huge. For a nuke program it will be massive