Pakistani terrorists attacked Army Camp in J&K's Uri

Status
Not open for further replies.

SANITY

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
695
Likes
305
it is a nuclear state plus always on suicidal mode.
the best bet we have is to fuel the secterian violence in pakistan.
Sectarian violence will cause civillian deaths. We should begin by killing high profile radical individuals in army and politicians using home grown terrorists. Watch out their reaction.
 

SANITY

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
695
Likes
305
In view of India being perceived as a banana republic in the eye of the whole world, certain sangathans have proposed that there is no reason for indians themselves to believe it otherwise. Hence in keeping up with the contemporary realities of the world, the most popular Slogan of India "VANDE MATARAM" should be re-phrased as "GHANTE MATARAM".

The official announcement will be made after the next MANN KA FART is delivered by our Honorable and beloved PM (FARTENDRA MODI).
May I ask if you make comments because of your concern for nation or something else. How do you identify yourself as a person? Patriot/ nationalist/ humanist / liberal / Secular/ Rightist/ leftist/ Communist /Socialist/ Cosmopolitan etc ?

Do you also post any suggestion in any of your posts?
 

sukhish

New Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
1,321
Likes
312
May I ask if you make comments because of your concern for nation or something else. How do you identify yourself as a person? Patriot/ nationalist/ humanist / liberal / Secular/ Rightist/ leftist/ Communist /Socialist/ Cosmopolitan etc ?

Do you also post any suggestion in any of your posts?
look at this guy, he has given me options to choose from. who are you, some general of some army ?
actually I am not even concerned about nation, because nobody else is either. stop fake pretension as if you are having sleep less nights because of URI.
 

OrangeFlorian

Anon Supreme
New Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
2,090
Likes
780
May I ask if you make comments because of your concern for nation or something else. How do you identify yourself as a person? Patriot/ nationalist/ humanist / liberal / Secular/ Rightist/ leftist/ Communist /Socialist/ Cosmopolitan etc ?
I identify as a right libertarian who supports free trade/capitalism and opposes a welfare state and interventionism and has angry communal tendencies derived from spending five years in Canada listening to idiotic lahoris (the majority of which should have been aborted) make up arguments about how muzzies are oppressed over here when the education system actually glorifies them and sticks their heads in the sand.
 

SANITY

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
695
Likes
305
look at this guy, he has given me options to choose from. who are you, some general of some army ?
actually I am not even concerned about nation, because nobody else is either. stop fake pretension as if you are having sleep less nights because of URI.
I am not having sleepless nights but you sure seem do. A proper sleep is necessary to think straight and positive. Look at your own comment, you don't care about nation but you can't leave the thread either. Get some sleep.
 

PD_Solo

The only one
New Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2016
Messages
502
Likes
620
Country flag
Bill moved in US Congress seeks to declare Pakistan state sponsor of terrorism
Yashwant Raj, Hindustan Times, Washington Updated: Sep 21, 2016 09:32 IST

Even as Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif is trying to shore up support in the UN general assembly for Pakistan over Kashmir, two American lawmakers introduced a bill in the US Congress on Tuesday proposing to designate Islamabad a state sponsor of terrorism. But Pakistan may still escape the terror tag.

“Not only is Pakistan an untrustworthy ally, Islamabad has also aided and abetted enemies of the United States for years,” said Ted Poe, chairman of the House subcommittee on terrorism, in a statement announcing the introduction of the bill, H.R.(H.R stands for House of Representatives) 6069, the Pakistan State Sponsor of Terrorism Designation Act.

“From harbouring Osama bin Laden to its cozy relationship with the Haqqani network, there is more than enough evidence to determine whose side Pakistan is on in the war on terror,” he added.

Poe, a Republican member of the House of Representatives from Texas, introduced the Bill jointly with Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican from California who heads the House’s sub-committee on Europe, Eurasia and emerging threats.

If enacted, the Bill will require the President to give a report to Congress within 90 days on whether Pakistan had supported international terrorism, or not. Within 30 days thereafter, the secretary of state will either determine Pakistan is a state sponsor of terrorism, or say why not.

“It is time we stop paying Pakistan for its betrayal and designate it for what it is: a state sponsor of terrorism,” Poe said.

The Congressman did not cite Pakistan’s role in the Uri attack, as alleged by New Delhi, among the reasons for introducing the bill, but there was an unmistakably direct link given the time and the context. There has been a steady stream of bipartisan expressions of support for India and condemnation of the attack on the army base in Uri by Pakistan-based Jaish-i-Mohammad since Sunday, from members of both chambers of Congress.

Frustration with Pakistan’s patchy record on counter-terrorism was so high that members had been mulling state-sponsor of terror designation for Pakistan for a while.

“If our current efforts in Pakistan are not producing the results we seek then what are our options?,” Representative Matt Salmon, a Republican, had asked during a recent Congressional hearing about Pakistan. “We could simply turn the money off … we could enforce sanctions or declare Pakistan as a state sponsor of terrorism,” he added.

Richard Grenier, who was once CIA station chief in Islamabad, told lawmakers at another hearing recently that the US had nearly designated Pakistan as a state sponsor of terror in the 1990s, around the time when militancy was escalating in Kashmir.

Pakistan escaped then, and will possibly escape this time as well.

What could work in favour of Pakistan is that there is not enough time left for this Congress to consider the Bill and ensure its passage through many stages. And even if it is passed, it may not get presidential assent given that the Obama administration is at the fag end of its term.

But the thought of a such a bill in the US Congress is unlikely to sit well with Prime Minister Sharif as he seeks to draw the world’s attention to an area frequently targeted by terrorists based in Pakistan.

The US currently has three countries on its list of state sponsors of terrorism — Iran, Syria and Sudan — who under the rules are subject to foreign assistance restrictions, ban on defence exports and sales, export control on dual use items and various other forms of restrictions.
 

Bornubus

Chodi Bhakt & BJPig Hunter
New Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2015
Messages
7,494
Likes
17,197
The bottom line is "Pak may still escape the terror tag" and their is no mention of Uri and Pathankot in the resolution so stop BSing.
 

sorcerer

New Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
26,919
Likes
98,474
Country flag
The bottm line is
URI and pathankot is not just the atrocities committed by pakistan..its numerous and applying terror tag by "international community" wont be based on pakistan terror against India but against world nations.

pakistan is getting terror tag for its global hand on terror which is more effective than using just "2" incidents to tag pakistan..
Also using pathankot or URI would bring in the K factor which pak will try to justify..so better the ban should be on pakistan sponsored terror on globe which suits India anyway.

The objective must be achieved and should not care about the version.

Tagging pakistan a terror state is not easy but it has to be done.
 

SANITY

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
695
Likes
305
The USA has a simple strategy to keep playing India and Pakistan. To keep Indians calm, some will say what might seem like they are taking Indian side like speaking of cancelling all financial aids to Pakistan and then in another session , they will speak of Pakistan's importance and possible setbacks if they stop aids altogether. That's how they want to reap maximum benefit from India-Pakistan. It's all pre-planned which law maker has to say what.

They are not escaping terror tags but they are made to. Imagine if they refused to co-operate with US after 9/11, they would have gotten that tag but it's India that is affected by this rogue nation and they are letting US take all action against those who can hurt US interest or people. So why would they call it a terrorist state? They have got what they want from them. I doubt they will force PAKistan to act against terrorist hurting our nation unless we take a clear alliance with US.
 
Last edited:

aditya10r

Mera Bharat mahan
New Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
5,724
Likes
11,638
Country flag
Sectarian violence will cause civillian deaths. We should begin by killing high profile radical individuals in army and politicians using home grown terrorists. Watch out their reaction.
Then plant some moles in the government and the army and fill their asses with money and encourage them to kill HVI's.
 

aditya10r

Mera Bharat mahan
New Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2016
Messages
5,724
Likes
11,638
Country flag
The USA has a simple strategy to keep playing India and Pakistan.To keep Indians calm, some will say what might seem like they are taking Indian side like speaking of cancelling all financial aids to Pakistan and then in another session , they will speak of Pakistan's importance and possible setbacks if they stop aids altogether. That's how they want to reap maximum benefit from India-Pakistan. It's all pre-planned which law maker has to say what.

They are not escaping terror tags but they are made to. Imagine if they refused to co-operate with US after 9/11, they would have gotten that tag but it's India that is affected by this rogue nation and they are letting US take all action against those who can hurt US interest or people. So why they call it a terrorist state. They have got what they want from them.
No matter wether USA call us major defense partner,strategic ally the truth is that we are conditional allies. Nothing more
 
  • Like
Reactions: NLD

FRYCRY

New Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2015
Messages
733
Likes
915
Country flag
Lots of disinformation being spread in media....can't even figure out which news is real and which is fake. Apni g bachane ke liye BJP ab ye sab kaar rahi hai, had they used media with such dedication during burhan wani fiasco aaj ye din ni dekhne parte
 

SANITY

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
695
Likes
305
Then plant some moles in the government and the army and fill their asses with money and encourage them to kill HVI's.
I will be sad to know if we have no mole in their government, military already. That would explain why we keep getting attacked and no retaliation. Using money is one way to plant moles. Manipulating radicals and conservatives against each other shouldn't be too difficult. They are feeling pressure to act against terrorists who have now begun to bite them back but those dimwit jihadis would like to act against those who act against them.
 

OneGrimPilgrim

New Member
Joined
May 18, 2015
Messages
5,252
Likes
6,825
Country flag
Lots of disinformation being spread in media....can't even figure out which news is real and which is fake. Apni g bachane ke liye BJP ab ye sab kaar rahi hai, had they used media with such dedication during burhan wani fiasco aaj ye din ni dekhne parte
janatakareporter (AAP) subsidiary news_our disseminating fake news now that paikhanistan has been declared a terrorist state by India, all trade stopped WIE, countries trading with paikhana wont be allowed to trade in India, Japan-france-germany join hands with India.....as always, trust pAAP to bait & invite all to roll-'n-squeal in its sty with it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top