Pakistan tests-fire nuclear-capable SRBM Hatf II (Abdali)

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Pakistan continues to prove they are shit scared of CSD. A 180 kms range battlefield missile after a 60 kms Nasr. Pakis have realized that realistically Nasr is a waste as it will be taken out in an Indian Air Force blitz because of its short range and need to station close to the border. It felt the need to make a missile that has a little more range so that it could hide it a little behind the lines.

And farhan thinks a 180 kms range missile will reach from Pak to Mumbai and delhi! :facepalm:
This missile is not for CSD because this missile payload is 500kg and for much severe destruction not below 1kt like in nasr case

nasr is a ideal missile specially designed for CSD with SUB kt warhead which means very limited destruction with high accuracy
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
ok. but problem is pakistan doesnt have a 300kt bomb. we will sue you for false claim of your capability and doing fraud.
you think so..it was confirmed by western sources that the infra of 4th Khushab series reactor suggest pakistan interest into Hydrogen bombs
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
This missile is not for CSD because this missile payload is 500kg and for much severe destruction not below 1kt like in nasr case

nasr is a ideal missile specially designed for CSD with SUB kt warhead which means very limited destruction with high accuracy
You don't get it do you? 180 kms is battlefield missile. India made such a missile in the 80s called Prithvi. Though it can easily target Lahore and Pindi with a 1 Ton warhead. The idea is to have a second line of missiles against the Indian IBGs. Still net result is that Pak will be nuking its own territory.
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
You don't get it do you? 180 kms is battlefield missile. India made such a missile in the 80s called Prithvi. Though it can easily target Lahore and Pindi with a 1 Ton warhead. The idea is to have a second line of missiles against the Indian IBGs. Still net result is that Pak will be nuking its own territory.
Prithvi is a liquid fuel missile based on a USSR missile..i would suggested you to read about project devil

Prithvi missile so does your AAD are clones of USSR missiles

4 of this onboard a mobile TEL each with 500kg payload.can blow up a city into trillions of pieces.
 

Coalmine

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
4,243
Likes
15,048
Country flag
What has abdali done for pakistan to get such a honour??.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Prithvi is a liquid fuel missile based on a USSR missile..i would suggested you to read about project devil

Prithvi missile so does your AAD are clones of USSR missiles

4 of this onboard a mobile TEL each with 500kg payload.can blow up a city into trillions of pieces.
Which city? And provided it survives Indian AF strike that will mark the beginning of CSD. And I am not talking of any nuke strikes by Inda but just conventional strikes.

Prithvi III is solid fueled. Prithvi I will be of no consequence as India has made the Prahar missile now.

Prahar is developed to provide a cost effective, quick reaction, all-weather, all-terrain, highly accurate battlefield support tactical system. The development of the missile was carried out by the DRDO scientists in a span of less than two years.[3] The missile fills the short-range tactical battlefield missile role as required by the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, to take out strategic and tactical targets. The mobile launch platform will carry six missiles, which can have different kind of warheads meant for different targets and can be fired in salvo mode in all directions covering the entire azimuth plane.[1]

This solid-fuelled missile can be launched within 2–3 minutes[4] without any preparation, providing significantly better reaction time than liquid-fuelled Prithvi ballistic missiles and act as a gap filler in the 150 km range, between the Pinaka Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher and Smerch MBRL in one end and the Prithvi ballistic missiles on the other.
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
Pakistan continues to prove they are shit scared of CSD. A 180 kms range battlefield missile after a 60 kms Nasr. Pakis have realized that realistically Nasr is a waste as it will be taken out in an Indian Air Force blitz because of its short range and need to station close to the border. It felt the need to make a missile that has a little more range so that it could hide it a little behind the lines.

And farhan thinks a 180 kms range missile will reach from Pak to Mumbai and delhi! :facepalm:
Pakistanis have finally concluded that ultimately they have no choice but to explode their bombs on themselves and their own territory. They are really under live threat of some Jihadi or Pathan Colonel or General getting hold of a few bomb and taking it to Khyber Pakhtunukhwa or Tora Bora like caves and threatening Pakistan from there. For a preemptive on such elements, Pakistan needs missiles of the range of 50 and 180 km. How far is swat from Punjabi Islamabad ?

Look so far as CSD is concerned. CSD will be all spread at eight to ten points. If they launch tacticle nuclear strikes at ten points inside Pakistan then half of Pakistan is gone. Launching Nasr at four points near border in Punjab means half of their cities which are near border are effected. Lahore is definetly gone by their own decontamination.

They can not launch Nasr in J&K due to multiple effects of such an action on themselves only.

Only Sindh is left. Pakistani generals have no love lost for Sindh which they were prepared to give to India during BRASSTACKS in 1986. They only want to save Punjab. So they can launch Nasr in Sindh.

But tell me. Is the Indian success on CSD dependent on Sindh alone?

Answer is NO. Success of CSD is dependent on success in J&K and Punjab where no Nasr can be launched due to Pakistan's own limitations. So why to worry about Nasr at all ?
Nasr is a big Pakistani bluff which needs to be called at.

Pakistan can not initiate a nuclear war against a country which is as big as India to ensure survivility but sure shot destruction of Pakistan.

If Pakistan initiates a nuclear exchange tell me which country on earth including China and North Korea is going to support them ? Who will bail them out after India has suffered some damage ?

Hence Nasr is a bluff and Pakistani are bluff masters..
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
Prithvi is a liquid fuel missile based on a USSR missile..i would suggested you to read about project devil

Prithvi missile so does your AAD are clones of USSR missiles

4 of this onboard a mobile TEL each with 500kg payload.can blow up a city into trillions of pieces.
have you ever seen project devil missile??



true to your nature Pakistani Madara education is top class :rofl:
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Which city? And provided it survives Indian AF strike that will mark the beginning of CSD. And I am not talking of any nuke strikes by Inda but just conventional strikes.

Prithvi III is solid fueled. Prithvi I will be of no consequence as India has made the Prahar missile now.

Prahar is developed to provide a cost effective, quick reaction, all-weather, all-terrain, highly accurate battlefield support tactical system. The development of the missile was carried out by the DRDO scientists in a span of less than two years.[3] The missile fills the short-range tactical battlefield missile role as required by the Indian Army and the Indian Air Force, to take out strategic and tactical targets. The mobile launch platform will carry six missiles, which can have different kind of warheads meant for different targets and can be fired in salvo mode in all directions covering the entire azimuth plane.[1]

This solid-fuelled missile can be launched within 2–3 minutes[4] without any preparation, providing significantly better reaction time than liquid-fuelled Prithvi ballistic missiles and act as a gap filler in the 150 km range, between the Pinaka Multi Barrel Rocket Launcher and Smerch MBRL in one end and the Prithvi ballistic missiles on the other.
Delhi is not much far from Pakistan

And after indian forces being taken out by Nasr...a few dozens being fired in 1 go..the PA will than look for offensive purpose to strike delhi along with indian key strategic post

Prahaar is a failed attempt and proves that india doesnt at the moment has a capability to field a missile of nasr size which warhead they can develop.

anyway have a look at Prahaar and this abdali missile..abdali is slight bigger but not much

Prahaar with 200kg warhead


Now abdali with upto 500kg warhead
 

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
instead of wasting so much time on new missile

my suggestion is PAEC should miniaturize the warhead to the level of A-100 Multiple rocket launcher system..and better tip each of them with small Pu based nukes

for rapid destruction

sound more cool
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
Pakis are so insecure that they are "test-firing" old missiles putting different paints on it which are nearing its expiry dates ....

And we dont evenn know since they show some old videos of "test-firing".

One thing is sure Pakis are really really scared of CSD and has no match against it.

Few Agni's on their major cities and they are back to stone age following Sharia Law. :lol:
 
Last edited:

farhan_9909

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
5,895
Likes
497
Abdali is good
but each per TEL makes the TEL many times more expensive the missile itself

we need a multitube variant of abdali with atleast 4 per TEL

even without nukes with conventional warhead having upto 500kg of warhead will result in massive destruction
 

Bhadra

Professional
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
11,991
Likes
23,758
Country flag
instead of wasting so much time on new missile

my suggestion is PAEC should miniaturize the warhead to the level of A-100 Multiple rocket launcher system..and better tip each of them with small Pu based nukes

for rapid destruction

sound more cool
I pity you...

why MBRLs...

make the AK bullets nuclear tipped...

what a man yaar..
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,952
Country flag
Abdali is good
but each per TEL makes the TEL many times more expensive the missile itself

we need a multitube variant of abdali with atleast 4 per TEL

even without nukes with conventional warhead having upto 500kg of warhead will result in massive destruction
Day dreamer you need double decker no wait you need 1+3 deck on your TEL :rofl:

 

Shirman

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2012
Messages
697
Likes
411
Country flag
Farhaan DUDE DID UR MOM HAD SOME NUCLEAR/ ATOMIC PILLS WHILE GIVING U BIRTH.....:p:confused:::rolleyes: I BET EVEN UR MORNING BREAKFAST CEREALS WILL HAVE A DILUTED PLUTONIUM MILK FROM PAKI COWS...........
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top