Ray sir, one esmall doubt. why dont we have two army chiefs and two armies,one exclusively paki centric and another exclusively china centric..similarly airforce and navy too. The equipment needed by both armies/forces are different apart from basic guns ...so the commonality is less. what i am seeing is ,for the past few months..china is putting aggressive postures and even entered AP and was quite belligerent even when AK was in Beijing.once that was over, it is pak turn, paki BAT team beheaded our soldiers, increased attacks in J&K on Army ,now mini battle in keran during NS-MMS meet...once this is over china will take over and vice versa. so this puts a heavy demand and stress on a single COAS. If there are two COAS.two navy chiefs,two airforce chiefs who will report to RM and President of india., things may be bit better , sync and coordination is essential.....what do you say!!!of course we have north,south,east ,west commands already...How to tackle china and pak independently?