smartindian
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2010
- Messages
- 614
- Likes
- 59
Look at the size of the Rafale's nose, how they'll ever fit a capable radar in that thing is beyond me. Removing OSF and IRST from the nose and pushing the radar further back will allow the designers to increase antenna diameter but still not enough room for a decent radar.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/india/shamsher.htm
As a newer platform, with future upgrade options, the Eurofighter is the best option for IAF MMRCA. However, looking at all the countries involved in the EF and all the delays in the project, there might be complications in ToT in the future.
The Rafael is a good fighter tested in combat, although a bit older platform than the EF. ToT may not be a big problem, although future ipgrade options maybe limited.
The F18 SH is a well-tested multi-role fighter, although it is used for naval/ marine use. It is NOT used by the USAF at all, since the USAF does not believe in the multi-role fighter too much. It is a platform that does have a lot of potential for IAF in the short term, but not much in the long term.[/QUOTE
Naval Fighters have operated from Landbased Air Forces since WWII. As a matter of fact several Air Forces currently operate the F/A-18 Hornets. Even the Super Hornet is now operated from landbases with the RAAF.
As for the USAF not believing to much in Multi-Role Fighters. What do you think the F-16 is????
IAF Shows reservation in operating American fighter Jets
BY: IDRW NEWS NETWORK
As per Source , IAF which has recently submitted another report on MMRCA aircraft's it has evaluated and has shown some reservation in operating American jets , Idrw.org could not confirm what was report about but it seems, like it was general feedback asked by MOD from the user IAF on its opinion.
Currently Two American jet makers , Boeing's F-18 SH and Lockheed Martins F-16 IN are in the lucrative IAf's MMRCA contract race to supply 126 fighter jets , While many defence experts in past have given F-16IN very slim chance of winning ,since India's rival air force has been operating them close to three decades now .
Defence expert Rakesh Sharma Believes that MMRCA aircraft which ever is selected with be based near Indo-China border and share the base with IAF's front line Sukhoi Su 30 MKI and in future with FGFA or AMCA , and since Americans are not keen in proving Deep TOT for AESA Radar which will come with the jets means that American air force and Vendor engineers in this base will be a common sight could be one of the possible reason about IAF's Reservation , he also added that IAF Fears that American jets might be bugged to keep check on their operational status .
Serving IAF officer based in Agra had reported to idrw.org that IAF fears American may finally deliver Heavily downgraded Aircraft since India refused to sign "CISMOA" agreement with US , IAF is already in process of receiving 6 C-130J Super Hercules aircraft's which according to him are heavily downgraded aircraft's and IAF is already in process of getting permission from OEM that is Lockheed Martin to put Indian and European communication Systems in the Aircraft ,even if the permission is granted whole upgrade will take place with close observation from Lockheed Martin officials which will then report to Vendor and US Government .
India Navy which has ordered P8I will be delivered without crucial electronics and down-rated avionics suite if India Fails to sign the CISMOA, Americans are already working to develop a downgraded Radar for the same aircraft .
US law mandates that certain sensitive American electronics can only be transferred abroad after the recipient country signs the CISMOA and/or the BECA.
If India refuses to sign CISMOA , it will mean American Jets will not be even close to aircraft's they had fielded in trials and will not be Hi-tech in terms of technology .
http://idrw.org/?p=1521
As I mentioned in my last post, USAF does not believe in multirole fighters "much" (much being the operative word here). The F-16 "fighting Falcon" was developed as a daytime dogfighter. It's design, airframe, weaponry etc all were directed for that purpose. It is only later that the F-16 became a "multi-role fighter" with generational modifications. The multi-role part was primarily developed since the F-14 tomcat was being phased out of the USAF and they still did not have a replacement for it. The F-18 conversely was developed as a multi-role naval fighter/ bomber from the beginning.As a newer platform, with future upgrade options, the Eurofighter is the best option for IAF MMRCA. However, looking at all the countries involved in the EF and all the delays in the project, there might be complications in ToT in the future.
The Rafael is a good fighter tested in combat, although a bit older platform than the EF. ToT may not be a big problem, although future ipgrade options maybe limited.
The F18 SH is a well-tested multi-role fighter, although it is used for naval/ marine use. It is NOT used by the USAF at all, since the USAF does not believe in the multi-role fighter too much. It is a platform that does have a lot of potential for IAF in the short term, but not much in the long term.
Naval Fighters have operated from Landbased Air Forces since WWII. As a matter of fact several Air Forces currently operate the F/A-18 Hornets. Even the Super Hornet is now operated from landbases with the RAAF.
As for the USAF not believing to much in Multi-Role Fighters. What do you think the F-16 is????
I also know that naval fighters have operated from land-based air-forces since WW-II, however, I wanted to point out to the fact that USAF does not include the F-18 in it's doctrine anymore because it does not believe in dedicated multi-role fighters anymore. The F-16 serves it purpose although it was not designed to be a multi-role fighter. On the other hand, USN and US marines do believe in and depend upon multi-role fighters and use the F-18 SH extensively.The General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon is a multirole jet fighter aircraft originally developed by General Dynamics for the United States Air Force. Designed as a lightweight, daytime fighter, it evolved into a successful multirole aircraft. Over 4,400 aircraft have been built since production was approved in 1976.[3] Though no longer being purchased by the U.S. Air Force, improved versions are still being built for export customers. In 1993, General Dynamics sold its aircraft manufacturing business to the Lockheed Corporation,[4] which in turn became part of Lockheed Martin after a 1995 merger with Martin Marietta.[5]
The Fighting Falcon is a dogfighter with numerous innovations including a frameless bubble canopy for better visibility, side-mounted control stick to ease control while maneuvering, reclined seat to reduce the effect of g-forces on the pilot and the first use of a relaxed static stability/fly-by-wire flight control system that makes it a highly nimble aircraft. The F-16 has an internal M61 Vulcan cannon and has 11 hardpoints for mounting weapons, and other mission equipment.[2] Although the F-16's official name is "Fighting Falcon", it is known to its pilots as the "Viper", due to it resembling a viper snake and after the Battlestar Galactica Colonial Viper starfighter.[6][7][8]
In addition to USAF active, reserve, and air national guard units, the aircraft is used by the USAF aerial demonstration team, the U.S. Air Force Thunderbirds, and as an adversary/aggressor aircraft by the United States Navy. The F-16 has also been selected to serve in the air forces of 25 other nations.[3]
Well, then purchase the Super Hornet for both the IAF and Indian Navy. Combined with the fact that the LCA-MK2 will be equipped with the same GE F414. Its just more icing on the cake.....I personally think India should go for the EF2000 for it's MMRCA and get the F-18 SH for the Indian navy. With the uncertainty around when LCA Tejas Mk2 Naval version will be available, the F-18 SH will be a valuable asset for IN.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
MRCA news and dicussions Part III | Indian Air Force | 999 | ||
Breaking news: MRCA winner announced | Indian Air Force | 13 | ||
S | MRCA News & Discussions (V) | Indian Air Force | 560 | |
MRCA news and discussion /feb-june 2009 | Indian Air Force | 632 |