Agantrope
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2009
- Messages
- 1,247
- Likes
- 77
Yeah that was termed as MiG-33 but not the project 33, MiG names the project as 1.XXThere was no Project 33. It was the first designation for the MiG-29M or Project 9.15.
Yeah that was termed as MiG-33 but not the project 33, MiG names the project as 1.XXThere was no Project 33. It was the first designation for the MiG-29M or Project 9.15.
LCA 4th gen??????????????????????currently lca qualified as 4th gen fighter. but if with aesa radar it should increase its status to 4.5 gen. thats the only reason its been put under 4th gen. technical specifications of both lca and jf 17 seem to be almost same. lca offers more payload. but surely lca design offers very good maneuverability.
i still wonder how come jf-17 is so cheap.
work is going on for AESA but no idea about its progress. Hope for the best .heard that an indegenious effort to develop an AESA radar for our LCA and MCA is it true?
currently lca qualified as 4th gen fighter. but if with aesa radar it should increase its status to 4.5 gen. thats the only reason its been put under 4th gen. technical specifications of both lca and jf 17 seem to be almost same. lca offers more payload. but surely lca design offers very good maneuverability.
i still wonder how come jf-17 is so cheap.
JF-17 is nothing other than a single engine fighter conceptualized, designed and in-house tested by Russians as Mig-33, later built and developed by Chinese using american money and at last sold to prestige(as per pakistani definitions) hungry, self-cheating pakistanis with a tag called sino-pak JV fighter.i still wonder how come jf-17 is so cheap.
Do you think, mid-fielders are required in a soccer team even when having strikers and defenders? If yes then you know why MRCAs are needed.Hi, i am very new to this thread, i have a question that Why the IAF is planing to purchase G 4.5 126 MRCA, when they have LCA is 4 + G fighter , Su30MKI , at the performance base Su30mki is the best plane in this region and i hope india can easily purchase or produce these fighters on to his own. ?
Buddy with the present configuration LCA is way ahead then JF-17LCA MKII will be ahead than Jf-17
We should not only be worried about JF 17 . we should try to match J10 . Thats our biggest threat as they will be deployed in big numbers by Chinese.Buddy with the present configuration LCA is way ahead then JF-17
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 86 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
LCA TEJAS MK1 & MK1A: News and Discussion | Indian Air Force | 18004 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 |