LCA TEJAS MK1 & MK1A: News and Discussion

Roland55

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
305
Likes
1,678
Country flag
Elta ELM-8222 is used by majority of IAF jets as personal EW/Jammer. Mk1 can carry it, so can Mig-21.
If we mount the jammer on Tejas Mk1’s hardpoints, it can still carry 6 missiles, while Mig-21 can carry only 3. So a clear edge in A2A/BVR combat.

Tejas Mk1A will be integrated with Uttam AESA radar which has in-built EW capability according to its brochure.
The range on the Bison is also smaller, but ill say its hands down to the R-77, a missile that i dont understand why it wasn't integrated into Tejas (Derby and ASTRA should be more than enough tho)
 

Bleh

Laughing member
New Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2017
Messages
6,239
Likes
26,077
Country flag
Afaik bvr engagement has nothing to do with EW systems ( internal or external ) directly
Oh no no nono noononono.that's the biggest role of EW
Egypt is buying more Rafales because it's Spectra jammed Su-35s radars completely in their own exercise, 100% kill rate. If Abhi had a jammer he wouldn't be shot down (or less easily).

As a so-called smart missile is not actually smart & it has an algorithm and follows that direction, that moment it can be spoofed if you have EW, otherwise you'll have to depend on your RWR to do evasive maneuvers & be on defensive instead of keeping the initiative.

The range on the Bison is also smaller, but ill say its hands down to the R-77, a missile that i dont understand why it wasn't integrated into Tejas (Derby and ASTRA should be more than enough tho)
R-77 isn't well liked in Indian Air Force. We're replacing it with Astra in both Sukhois & Migs too. Not to be integrated to Tejas.
 

THESIS THORON

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2021
Messages
6,594
Likes
32,201
Country flag
We do all know for sure Abhinandans communication was blocked. Was his Mig21 not carrying the EW in an forward base? If it was not, then how many units IAF has? If IAF cannot spare suites for forward bases, how many Tejas will have?
the comms were jammed because at that time bison was not carrying any sdr (software defined radio).
 

Tang

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2019
Messages
551
Likes
1,357
Country flag
The range on the Bison is also smaller, but ill say its hands down to the R-77, a missile that i dont understand why it wasn't integrated into Tejas (Derby and ASTRA should be more than enough tho)
Read it somewhere
Russian refused to integrate R77 with Tejas, BVR missiles need radar communication for course correction.
We will have better BVR in Tejas via AstraMK1 and other missiles like python and Derby which are already integrated with it
 

Roland55

New Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2020
Messages
305
Likes
1,678
Country flag
Read it somewhere
Russian refused to integrate R77 with Tejas, BVR missiles need radar communication for course correction.
We will have better BVR in Tejas via AstraMK1 and other missiles like python and Derby which are already integrated with it
I remember reading the same (possibly in some article or even here), Still Derby or ASTRA are perfect candidates, with the latter being possibly the better choice (Regular Astra+IR)
 

Dark Sorrow

Respected Member
New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
4,988
Likes
9,937
The range on the Bison is also smaller, but ill say its hands down to the R-77, a missile that i dont understand why it wasn't integrated into Tejas (Derby and ASTRA should be more than enough tho)
Their was a pricing issue regarding Russian assistance for integrating Russian weapons like R-77 and R-73.
Negotiation failed between Rosoboronexport/Russian team and Indian team (DRDO/ADA team) repeatedly.
Even R-73 integrated without the involvement of the Russians (which caused delays).
Derby-I is believed to much better than R-77 and Rafael is providing much better support.
As for R-77, Astra Mk. 1 uses same seeker and its integration is much simpler.
 

Dark Sorrow

Respected Member
New Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
4,988
Likes
9,937
That area will house landing parachutes. Honestly speaking i've always wanted a tail jammer in that position just like Rafale. Even in the Mk2 that area will house parachutes
SPJ are always placed at an elevated position on vertical stabilizer as it provides a better field view and less obstruction.
 

abingdonboy

New Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
8,084
Likes
33,803
Country flag
When was the last time HAL handed over a SP to the IAF? we know they are stockpiling them at HAL but even first flights have been few lately although they look on track to meet all their 2022/23/24 deadlines in terms of production. Handing over to the IAF seems like it’s the bottleneck
 

Whitecollar

New Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2021
Messages
574
Likes
2,229
Country flag
When was the last time HAL handed over a SP to the IAF? we know they are stockpiling them at HAL but even first flights have been few lately although they look on track to meet all their 2022/23/24 deadlines in terms of production. Handing over to the IAF seems like it’s the bottleneck
As somebody here said, they may be undergoing modifications for integrating Astra MK1. Once done and tested, they maybe handed over in bulk.
 

Rajaraja Chola

New Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
767
Likes
2,430
Country flag
When was the last time HAL handed over a SP to the IAF? we know they are stockpiling them at HAL but even first flights have been few lately although they look on track to meet all their 2022/23/24 deadlines in terms of production. Handing over to the IAF seems like it’s the bottleneck
Based on response given by the Minister in Parliament, IAF has 8 FOC aircrafts. And total of 24 Tejas.
So I believe IAF has taken delivery of these birds and maybe some IOC has moved over to forward base temporarily. HAL has promised to deliver remaining 8 by April- May 2022. HAL already has started to build 2 trainers and they are on jig.
 

Articles

Top