You are completely wrong on composite part ! Composites are not solely used for RCS reduction.Sole reasons why composites r used in modern aircraft is to reduce rcs of fighterjets.. metals r cheap .. why on earth composites is used then.
His point is mute since tender for mwf jig assembly are out for a long time now and tender for mwf tire were seen recently. So the bird is already in the making. Also he was talking in context of gripen E a program started much earlier which makes it ready before mwf but by the same logic it will be behind mwf in avionics as mwf will take advantage of technologies which are maturing a bit late like drone swarm , GaN based ew and radar , dual color maws , next gen ols/ irst mwf will be a step ahead of gripen E.He maybe a Chinese troll or Xinnie the Pooh himself disguised as a schoolgirl posting here.. As long as he has a point.. let's take it fairly. It took us almost 5 years and Mk1A order is still not signed which doesn't have any major modifications that will impact aerodynamics. For MWF.. we are yet to see a prototype with modifications to the frame and then the actual order will come after years of bureaucratic process. Our best case scenario is the production in 2027 and then by the time we expect MWF to see some action after training and tactics.. it will be atleast 2030. Meanwhile let bat munchers come and help keep us on our toes. Good for us!!
which one??Heard news that 21 additional to the 83 to addede's to the order's is that true ?
LCA Teja's MK 2's .which one??
83 is for MK1A. MK2 is different....or you're saying MK2 initial order along with MK1A??LCA Teja's MK 2's .
Sorry, Mark 1A's .83 is for MK1A. MK2 is different....or you're MK@ initial order along with MK1A??
I don't know what's the current worldwide progress on Al-Ti alloys or even for CMCs. But, all I can tell to the members of this forum is that if a combination of alloy or composites will be able to achieve the perovskite or coesite structure (the same mineral/alloy structure as that of the Earth's mantle), it'll be the greatest advancement in composite-alloy metallurgy of this century and ever after.You are completely wrong on composite part ! Composites are not solely used for RCS reduction.
Composites are used in aircraft primarily due to better strength as compared to conventional structural material like Aluminum alloys & Steel (Tensile strength: 1000 MPa & above for typical composites v/s 200-300 MPa for Al-Steel grades). This imparts far better strength is to weight ratio leading to considerable weight savings. Needless to explain significance of weight savings for aircraft design. Other benefits are just by-products.
Refer to this paper if you like to learn more about Aircraft structural materials;
Light-weighting in aerospace component and system design
Light-weighting involves the use of advanced materials and engineering methods to enable structural elements to deliver the same, or enhanced, technic…www.sciencedirect.com
Cool !! In the meantime, SAAB engineers has already stopped doing anything meaningful till MWF gets far ahead. Wishful thinking at best.Also he was talking in context of gripen E a program started much earlier which makes it ready before mwf but by the same logic it will be behind mwf in avionics as mwf will take advantage of technologies which are maturing a bit late like drone swarm , GaN based ew and radar , dual color maws , next gen ols/ irst mwf will be a step ahead of gripen E.
Well, the Su-30 structure is a whole metal Ti-Al alloy. Soviets had pioneered in Ti-based materials. Ti-alloys are also used in turbine engines as well (Primary compressor blades).I don't know what's the current worldwide progress on Al-Ti alloys or even for CMCs. But, all I can tell to the members of this forum is that if a combination of alloy or composites will be able to achieve the perovskite or coesite structure (the same mineral/alloy structure as the Earth's mantle), it'll be the greatest advancement in composite-alloy metallurgy of this century and ever after.
The phenomenological model was later employed to systematically screen and identify perovskite compounds with high breakdown strength. The purely machine learning based screening revealed that boron-containing compounds are of particular interest, some of which were predicted to exhibit remarkable intrinsic breakdown strength of ~1 GV/m (see Fig. 3d). These predictions were subsequently confirmed using first principles computations.32
It does not come down to what the pilots want , it comes down to what the country can afford. We cannot keep on planning for today, a country needs to plan long term too. IAF is never going to reach 42 squadrons on imports.So dont blame Indian or Israeli pilots if they say I want the best plane we can afford, and I dont shit where its made.
So tell me exactly what Saab engineers are doing right now?? We are running AMCA tedbf in parallel with mk1a and tedbf . Also building ghatak ( AURA) simultaneously.Cool !! In the meantime, SAAB engineers has already stopped doing anything meaningful till MWF gets far ahead. Wishful thinking at best.
Tell that to Saab who think their gripen is better than rafale and will shoot down f35 in a jiffy.. Be humble while doing comparison; the aircraft under scrutiny (Gripen NG) is already flying and has secured orders overseas
I think you got me confused with the gripen lobby.We have pushed back tejas and other indigenous programs for so many years because of the exact point he is making. We have already purchased Rafale for the stop gap, why do we need gripen now? It was also in the race with rafale and rafale has beaten it. Advocating gripen is just beating a dead horse. And advocating gripen instead of Tejas is just pure lobbying.
Since you know everything; it doesn't leave anything to debate.Doesn't change the fact that mwf is already a better design.
I don't see this as a waste but necessity. There is nothing like Rafale in the works; XR-SAM is still at least 5-7 years from testing and induction. So yes the S-400 will plug in gaps for a while. The initial plan for S-400 was for around 12 regiments, cut down to 5 due to XR-SAM in the works.Import Air Force Is going to burn 27 billion dollars on imports
-7 billion on 36 Rafales
-5 billion on S400
- now they pushing for 15 Billion dollar deal for 114 MRCA..
This is criminal waste of money.
and where is the money for the AWACS, EW aircraft, mid air refueling tankers, and not to mention upgrading frontline air base infra?I don't see this as a waste but necessity. There is nothing like Rafale in the works; XR-SAM is still at least 5-7 years from testing and induction. So yes the S-400 will plug in gaps for a while. The initial plan for S-400 was for around 12 regiments, cut down to 5 due to XR-SAM in the works.
It is true that some of these purchases are necessity now. But then resources are limited and if we go for 114 MRCA (either we go for gripen or rafale or f-18), how much budget resources left for MWF, Mk1A, AMCA etc. I think we may be over-estimating PLA/CCP air capability on LAC, we need to ramp up production of MK1/MK1A & free up resources meant for western stooges. I only see this panic buy mode by IAF to import stuff, no one encouraging smaller SMSE's , HAL to step on the gas to increase local production. Our whole problem currently has been this limited capital for internal R&D & covid has aggravated overall economic issue.I don't see this as a waste but necessity. There is nothing like Rafale in the works; XR-SAM is still at least 5-7 years from testing and induction. So yes the S-400 will plug in gaps for a while. The initial plan for S-400 was for around 12 regiments, cut down to 5 due to XR-SAM in the works.
Testing something doesn't mean this thing is better than other foreign product. There are plenty of examples of that actual performance is much lower than the scientists claim because:Sorry sir but on this , you are wrong it is in a advance way where many parts and critical technology are being tested , you may be Wright's about the protopying as we still are few years away from prototyping the MWF's .
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Tejas: Photos & Footages (no text other than headings) | Military Multimedia | 87 | ||
LCA TEJAS and what makes it stand out | Knowledge Repository | 8 | ||
W | Rise of LCA Tejas Multi Role Fighter Aircraft | Indian Air Force | 23 | |
C | LRUs or parts of LCA Tejas Made and designed in India | Indian Air Force | 16 |