tsunami
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 3,529
- Likes
- 16,572
All this things were being discussed when MK1A concept first came. But no body is talking about any specific weight reduction when contract is actually being signed. That's why I asked is it still on cards or we just dropped the idea.Why Probably. It is not designed considering RCS unlike tejas which is optimized for lowest RCS under aerodynamic constrains. Tejas uses Composites which JF 17 doesn't use. It takes almost double time to take off inspite of very big LAVCON. Its maneuverability and T/W ratio is poor. JF 17 pilot tried to copy Tejas in air show and could mangw the vertical fligt for 1 second only and that by its kinetic energy. Tejas' pilot could fly it vertically for mor more than 10 second to about 20 second. Vertical loop timing of tejas is <20 second and horizantal looping is about 23 second which is reduced to less than 20 second Mk1+ with aerodynamic improvement. Many such changes are coming in Tejas in all front including weight, Aerodynamic, RCS and electronics. Bunder is improving in Electronic only. Those improvements too are with junk Chinese electronics.